Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001070

Original file (MD1001070.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100324

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20060324 - 20060411     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20060412     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20061122      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 10 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 64
MOS: 6600
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF : NJP: SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20061116 :       For disregard of command liberty policy by leaving squadron barracks while in a phase I liberty status.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues
1.       The Applicant contends she disclosed information regarding her mental health history to her recruiter but was told not to disclose it on her enlistment documents. The Applicant believed she was cured, was not on medication, and would have no fur ther mental health problems.
2.       The Applicant contends she performed well until her mental breakdown and deserves an H onorabl e characterization of service.

Decision
Date: 20 1 1 0421          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning , and no misconduct resulting in non-judicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the Applicant ’s failure to disclose pre-existing mental health issues , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing , the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she disclosed information regarding her mental health history to her recruiter but was told not to disclose it on her enlistment documents. The Applicant believed she was cured, was not on medication, and would have no further mental health problems. Applicable regulations state that Marines who procure a fraudulent enlistment will be processed for separation unless the fraud is waived or the fraud no longer exists. An enlistment is fraudulent when there has been deliberate material misrepresentation, including the omission or concealment of facts which, if known at the time, would have reasonably been expected to preclude, postpone, or otherwise affect the Marine ’ s eligibility for enlistment or induction. Evidence of pre-service misrepresentations about matters that would have precluded, postponed, or otherwise affect the member ’ s eligibility for enlistment or induction may be considered in assigning characterization of service . The record clearly shows the Applicant engaged in fraud during her enlistment process by not revealing her mental health history. Despite her allegations of recruiter misconduct, the Applicant ha d a responsibility to disclose all relevant information truthfully during the enlistment process. The NDRB found the Applicant engaged in clear fraud that would have precluded her entry into the Marine Corps had the information been disclosed. This conduct warranted a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service. An upgrade would be inappropriate.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends she performed well until her mental breakdown and deserves an H onorable characterization of service. The record shows the Applicant had one P age 11 entry for failure to obey the liberty policy by leaving the squadron barracks without authorization , and no other misconduct during her time of service. The Applicant was diagnosed with personality disorder, not otherwise specified, and Major Depressive Disorder when referred to mental health. Additionally, the Applicant revealed an extensive history of suicidal ideations and reckless and impulsive behaviors that were not disclosed during the enlistment process. This e vidence of pre-service misrepresentations was appropriately considered in assigning her characterization of service . The NDRB found the Applicant’s engagement in fraud warranted the General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101309

Original file (ND1101309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Whether or not she contracted mononucleosis while in service does not change the fact that she was not forthcoming with medical information during the enlistment process, which warranted her separation for Fraudulent Entry. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901068

Original file (ND0901068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issue 3: (Decisional) () .The Applicant also requested an upgrade in the characterization of her discharge based on post–service conduct but has submitted no documentation of post-service accomplishments for the Board’s consideration. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. A request for a waiver can...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700459

Original file (ND0700459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found that Dissenting Opinion One board member voted to change the characterization to honorable based on the Applicant’s evaluation marks, overall performance and clear diagnosis of personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101508

Original file (ND1101508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant wants the Separation Code, along with its corresponding Narrative Reason for Separation, changed. Relief denied.Issue 4: (Decisional) () .The Applicant suggests her post-service conduct, as evidenced by her college attendance, warrants consideration for changing her character of service, separation code, and narrative reason.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in changing the characterization of a discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501138

Original file (ND1501138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300039

Original file (ND1300039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends she was denied her rights under Part V of the Manual for Courts-Martial.6.The Applicant contends she received three Nonjudicial Punishments (NJPs) for the same alleged offenses.7.The Applicant contends she received punishment twice for the same alleged offenses.8. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401060

Original file (ND1401060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade in order to receive service benefits.2. There is no indication in the evidence of record or in the documentation submitted by the Applicant that the Applicant was recommended for or processed for a medical separation by proper authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201450

Original file (ND1201450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100386

Original file (ND1100386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

: (Non-decisional) The Applicant wants her RE code changed so she can reenlist in the military, as she is now in good health. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000791

Original file (MD1000791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20070420 - 20070506Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070507Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20070606Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)30 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:68MOS: 8000Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NA/NAFitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001070

Similar Decisions