Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801266
Original file (ND0801266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex – AMEAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080510
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 20020322 - 20020414                  Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20020415      Period of E nlistment : Years 12 M o nth Extension         Date of Discharge: 20041118
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 04 D a ys Education Level:    Age at Enlistment:      AFQT: 63
Highest Rank /Rate : E-3   Evaluation M arks: Performance: 2.67(3) Behavior: 2.33 (3) O TA: 2.39
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF : NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C : Retention Warnings:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Other Documentation (Describe) :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 19 June 2005, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Seeking GI Bill benefits to resume his education and reenlist into military service.
2. Post service conduct.

Decision

Date : 20 08 1204   Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

 : The Applicant is seeking an upgrade in order to obtain the GI Bill so he can further his education and increase his potential for reenlistment . either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning and Reen l istment/RE Code s , for additional information regarding .

: ( ) . The Applicant is seeking an upgrade to “H onorable ” a n d contends he has been attending college to obtain his paramedic license since being discharged. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The medical documentation in the Applicant’s military service record revealed after serving approximately two years and seven months of active duty, the Applicant was diagnosed with major depression (recurrent severe) and he was administratively separated due to a Personality Disorder.

In addition to examining matters of post service conduct, the Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity , the Naval service regulations permit relief on equitable grounds. Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-122, based on the members overall service record and performance , members discharged on the basis of a Personality Disorder should receive an “H onorable ” unless a “G eneral ( U nder H onorable Conditions ) ” is warranted. The Applicant’s service record did not contain evidence of misconduct that would prevent a characterization of “Honorable" and the adverse evaluation was deemed to be mitigated by the Applicant’s mental condition. Based on the foregoing, t he NDRB concluded there was an i nequity in the discharge characterization and determined the awarded characterization was inappropriate; an upgrade to “Honorable ” would be appropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900127

    Original file (ND0900127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020518 - 20021002Active:20021003 - 20060803 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060804Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070329Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.50Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801803

    Original file (ND0801803.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-122, a service member separated due to a personality disorder should receive an “Honorable ” characterization unless an entry level separation or “General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” is warranted by the record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800371

    Original file (ND0800371.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-122, members discharged on the basis of a Personality Disorder should receive and “Honorable ” unless a “General (Under Honorable) ” is warranted based on the members overall...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801104

    Original file (ND0801104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the foregoing, the NDRB determined a change to the characterization was appropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902420

    Original file (ND0902420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Moreover, an Honorable characterization of service is warranted unless an Entry Level Separation or a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service is appropriate per MILPERSMAN section 1910-308.A review of the Applicant’s evaluation and counseling records revealed one observed report covering a seven-month period (Nov 2001 - Jun 2002) in which he received marks of 3.0 (Performance), 3.0 (Behavior), and 3.00 (Overall Trait Average). Based on these evaluation marks, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801365

    Original file (ND0801365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Applicant received a “ General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” discharge for a Personality Disorder. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101891

    Original file (ND1101891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was administratively processed for separation due to a personality disorder. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001414

    Original file (ND1001414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. medical and record entries,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901348

    Original file (ND0901348.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to non-servicerelated administrative matters, i.e., veteran’s benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101108

    Original file (ND1101108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...