Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800371
Original file (ND0800371.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ATAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20071218
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20031203 - 20040217             
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20040218      Period of E nlistment : 4 Years + 12 month e xtension       Date of Discharge: 20050927
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 07 M on ths 10 D a ys Education Level: Bach Degree Age at Enlistment: 26    AFQT: 94
Highest Rank /Rate : CTA3           Evaluation M arks: Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )    Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )                  OTA: 3.0 (1)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , , and

Periods of UA /C ONF :

Retention Warning: .
        
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
                  - Letter from Representative Silvestre R., Texas, U. S. House of Representatives of 2 August 2007
        
Other Documentation (Describe) :
-        VA Entitlement;
-        Acceptance into Alternative Teacher Certification Program Online;
-        Eligible to enroll at University of Texas at El Paso as a post-baccalaureate student;
-        Accession recommendation to Naval Reserve Recruiting Command.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. R een listment opportunity .
2. Post service conduct .


Decision

Date: 20 08 0320             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

: The Applicant has requested an upgrade in order to return to the military. either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information on Reenlistment/RE-code s.
Issue 2 ( ): RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews . Supporting documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s or other financial institutions; documentation of a drug free lifestyle; and character witness statements. The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.

The Applicant submitted letters of endorsement, continuing education and Veteran Benefits eligibility re quest in support of her request for an upgrade . To warrant an upgrade the Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Applicant could have produced additional evidence as stated in the above paragraph with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. The Board determined based on the documentation provided an upgrade based on post-service conduct would be inappropriate at this time.

In addition to examining matters of post service conduct, th e Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity , the Naval service regulations permit relief on equitable grounds. A review of the medical documentation reveals that after serving approximately one year and seven months of active duty, the Applicant was admitted to a psychiatric ward and diagnosed with Bulimia, Depressive Dis order, and Personality Disorder; then recommended for expeditious administrative separation due to Personality Disorder . Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-122, members discharged on the basis of a Personality Disorder should receive and “H onorable ” unless a “G eneral ( U nder H onorable ) ” is warranted based on the members overall service record and performance. The Applicant’s service record did not contain evidence of misconduct or adverse counseling during her enlistment which would prevent a characterization of “H onorable ” from being awarded . The NDRB concluded there was an i nequity in the characterization of discharge and determined an upgrade to “Honorable” was appropriate.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902420

    Original file (ND0902420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Moreover, an Honorable characterization of service is warranted unless an Entry Level Separation or a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service is appropriate per MILPERSMAN section 1910-308.A review of the Applicant’s evaluation and counseling records revealed one observed report covering a seven-month period (Nov 2001 - Jun 2002) in which he received marks of 3.0 (Performance), 3.0 (Behavior), and 3.00 (Overall Trait Average). Based on these evaluation marks, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900127

    Original file (ND0900127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020518 - 20021002Active:20021003 - 20060803 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060804Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20070329Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(2)Behavior:2.5(2)OTA: 2.50Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801365

    Original file (ND0801365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Applicant received a “ General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” discharge for a Personality Disorder. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001414

    Original file (ND1001414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. medical and record entries,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101108

    Original file (ND1101108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801803

    Original file (ND0801803.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-122, a service member separated due to a personality disorder should receive an “Honorable ” characterization unless an entry level separation or “General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” is warranted by the record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900941

    Original file (ND0900941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Based on a review of the evidence of record as noted supra , and the medical documentation provided by the Applicant, the NDRB determined the narrative reason of Personality Disorder is most appropriate. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900760

    Original file (ND0900760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was warranted based on her diagnosis and the command administratively separated the Applicant properly from the naval service by reason of convenience of the government – personality disorder.For discharges based on personality disorder, the discharge should be Honorable unless an Entry Level Separation or a General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted. Therefore, the NDRB found the Applicant’s original characterization, General (Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801266

    Original file (ND0801266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700459

    Original file (ND0700459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found that Dissenting Opinion One board member voted to change the characterization to honorable based on the Applicant’s evaluation marks, overall performance and clear diagnosis of personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...