Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800856
Original file (ND0800856.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-STGSN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080213
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE)
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19950519 - 19950906              Active: 19950907 – 19990606 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19990607      Period of E nlistment : Years Extension          Date of Discharge: 19990723
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 17 D ys      Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 99
Highest Rank /Rate : STG3   Evaluation M arks: Performance: NFIR       Behavior: NFIR    OTA: NFIR
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): BATTLE “E” (3) AFEM (2) SSDR (2) NDSM

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJPs :    
         19990615 : Art icle 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance) .
                  Awarded - . Susp -
        
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 19950907-19990606 ”
        

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Seeking eligib ility for VA benefits and college fund.
2. Post service conduct .

Decision

Date : 20 08 0627             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).
Discussion

 . The Applicant is requesting the characterization of his discharge be upgraded in order to obtain VA benefits and the college fund. which the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information regarding and
Service Benefits .

Issue 2 (Equity ) : RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. For post service conduct consideration t he Applicant contends he has been working steadily for the past 6 years and has not had engaged in any misconduct . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s service record is marred by 1 non-judicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). Violations of Article 112a are considered a serious offense which can result in a punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated by a special or general court-martial. The Command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted for an administrative discharge instead.

For the edification of the Applicant, t here is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the Navy . The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to review in consideration for an upgrade. As a result, the Board determined an upgrade is not warranted at this time.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 24, effective 20 May 99 until
26 March 2000, Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801179

    Original file (ND0801179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion :() .The Applicant requested an upgrade from General (Under Honorable Conditions) to “Honorable”. The Board determined based on the lack of documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate and the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the time served and the UCMJ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700182

    Original file (ND0700182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    112a (4 specs) - (1) Wrongfully possess methamphetamine, (2) Wrongfully distribute methamphetamine, (3) Wrongfully possess marijuana, (4) Wrongfully distribute marijuana.Awarded - FOP ($427.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-1); Restriction for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days) Discharge Process Date Notified: 19950907Reason for Discharge:- Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19950907Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801329

    Original file (ND0801329.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant did notprovide a personal statement, supporting documentation of post service accomplishments or character witness statements to support his request for an upgrade. Without having the necessary...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801226

    Original file (ND0801226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a personal statement and as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800711

    Original file (ND0800711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801473

    Original file (ND0801473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant requested for the NDRB to consider his post-service conduct in support of his request for an upgrade in his characterization to “Honorable.” Besides the Applicant’s statement on the DD Form 293, he provided an additional character reference and other post-service related documents on his behalf. appropriate based on the Applicant’s post-service conduct.After a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902623

    Original file (ND0902623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the military.2. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant had an opportunity to defend himself, but waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board or a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review. ” Additional Reviews...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800731

    Original file (ND0800731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - Types of Documents Submitted/ReviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800680

    Original file (ND0800680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE).Discussion (): RELIEF NOT WARRANTED.The Applicant did not present any issues however, it is assumed from the certificates provided the Applicant is requesting an upgrade in the characterization of his discharge based on post service conduct. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902519

    Original file (ND0902519.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for an administrative discharge.While in-service, the Applicant had an opportunity to defend himself, but he waived his rights to:refuse commanding officer’s NJP and request trial by court-martial; appeal the NJP; request an administrative board proceeding; and submit a written statement to the Separation Authority.The Applicant signed the USNAlcohol and Drug Policy on 3 Jun 1999 and was fully aware there is a zero-tolerance...