Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800078
Original file (ND0800078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MASN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20071016
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20030109 - 20030818             
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20030819                       Period of enlistment : 4                  Date of Discharge: 20050209
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 21 D ys      Education Level: 12                Age at Enlistment: 20     AFQT: 71
Highest Rank /Rate : MASN   Evaluation marks: Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )    Behavior: 2.0 ( 1 )                  OTA: 2.67 (1)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214) : , , and

Retention Warnings: 20040927 : Violation of UCMJ Article 128 .

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

         “ GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS ) ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.


Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Reenlistment code.
2. Discharge inequitable because it was based solely on declining alcohol treatment.
3 . Post service – no alcohol incidents or law infractions since discharge, currently enrolled in college (unofficial transcript),

Decision

Date: 20 08 0214             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): The Applicant contends that his discharge was in equitable because it was based solely on his refusal to complete alcohol abuse treatment. MILPERSMAN 1910-152 directs that c ommands shall process for administrative separation all members considered to be treatment failures . A treatment failure is defined as w illful failure to complete me dically prescribed treatment. Following the Applicant’s second alcohol related incident he was diagnosed as alcohol dependant by competent medical authority. Subsequently he was offered Level III treatment for his dependency which he refused to complete after being advised of the consequences. Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. The Applicant’s conduct reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

Issue 3 ( ): The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge . However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the servi ce. Normally, to permit relief a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. O utstanding post-service conduct to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided an unofficial transcript of his college courses along with a statement the board claiming to be alcohol incident free and a law abiding citizen since his discharge as doc umentation of his post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced official evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presume s regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence ( to include evidence submitted by the Applicant ) to rebut the presumption . After a thorough review of the available evidence to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, m edical and s ervice r ecord e ntries, d ischarge p rocess and evid ence submitted by the Applicant the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION
 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000225

    Original file (ND1000225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, the reason for separation was not indicative of his overall performance or conduct in service; as such, Applicant requests consideration for an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge to Honorable. Further, the reason for separation was not indicative of his overall performance or conduct in service; as such, Applicant requests an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge to Honorable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000265

    Original file (ND1000265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Nondecisional issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in characterization of service to Honorable in order to gain eligibility to the Post 9/11 G.I. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801428

    Original file (ND0801428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s records should be retained there for at least two years following discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800741

    Original file (ND0800741.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Extracted from CO’s message in case file].Applicant incurred DUI/DWI and alcohol related incident after having received Level I treatment that resulted from a previous DUI/DWI. The evidence of post service conduct while commendable did not provide a basis to change the narrative reason.Based on the foregoing evidence, the Board found the Applicant was properly discharged and determined a change in the narrative reason would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000405

    Original file (ND1000405.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20020531 - 20021111Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20021112Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20060908Highest Rank/Rate:MA3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 52EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(4)Behavior:2.7(4)OTA: 3.14Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000215

    Original file (ND1000215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received an enlistment waiver for pre-service use of marijuana and further acknowledged his complete understanding of the Navy Substance Abuse Policy – in writing – on 04 July 2000.The Applicant’s record of service included two NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention-counseling warnings and one non-judicial punishment for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) as follows: Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation, 2 specifications) • Article 134 (Uttering worthless checks, 9...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000386

    Original file (ND1000386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable since his misconduct was an isolated incident. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900873

    Original file (ND0900873.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined there was sufficient evidence to support the discharge based on alcohol rehabilitation failure, and found the narrative reason to be proper.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions), and the narrative reason for separation shall remain Alcohol...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800511

    Original file (ND0800511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20010831 - 20011016 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20011017Period of enlistment: YearsDate of Discharge:20041028Length of Service: Yrs Mths12 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 62Highest Rank/Rate:PCSNEvaluation marks:Performance: NA Behavior:NAOTA: NAAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):,NMCOSR,, and NJP:20040304: Violations of UCMJ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901350

    Original file (ND0901350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Personal problems. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.