Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801428
Original file (ND0801428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AT2, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080625
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 19940604 - 19940725                 Active: 19940726 - 19970622    
                                                               19970623 - 20001129
                                                               20001130 - 20061126

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20061127     Period of E nlistment : Years Extension         Date of Discharge: 20070625
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 29 D a ys       Education Level:        Age at Enlistment:      AFQT: 44
Highest Rank /Rate : AT2   Evaluation M arks: Performance:    NOB ( 1 )   Behavior: 1 ( 1 )          OTA: 1.00
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF : NJP : NFIR S CM : NFIR SPCM: NFIR C C : NFIR Retention Warnings: NFIR

Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report :

- Undated: Documents DUI on 24 Dec ember 2006, DUI on 7 May 2007, and enrollment in inpatient substance abuse treatment.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERSMAN 1910-152 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Other Documentation (Describe) :




Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-152, SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION FAILURE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 and 112 .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Separation authority shown on DD-214 should be changed from MILPERSMAN 1910-142.
2. Separation code shown on DD-214 should be changed.
3 . Discharge should be “Honorable” due to errors above (Issues 1 and 2) and hasty nature of the discharge.
4. Not paid for accrued leave.
5. Not paid for travel to home of record upon discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 08 1023             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE .
Discussion

 : ( ) . The Applicant contends the separation authority shown on his DD-214 is incorrectly stated as MILPERSMAN 1910-142. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant was notified of separation due to “ alcohol rehabilitation failure ” and “ commission of a serious offense ” . However, the reason for separation directed by the command ing officer was “ alcohol rehabilitation failure ” . The correct paragraph for this narrative reason is MILPERSMAN 1910-152. The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
: ( ) . The Applicant contends the Separation Code given on his DD-214 should be changed to reflect the code associated with separation due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. The Board determined the separation code “HPD” is correct in accordance with MILPERSMAN article 1910-152. Once the separation authority is correct as noted in Issue 1, the separation code reflected on the DD-214 will be more in line. A change would be inappropriate at this time .

: ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded due to Issues 1 and 2 above, and the hasty nature of his discharge. The Applicant’s service record is marred by two charges of violating the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 111 ( D riving under the influence on 24 December 2006 and 7 May 2007 ) , and a charge of violating Article 112 ( B e ing drunk on duty on 7 May 2007). These v iolation s are considered s erious offense s , punishable by punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for an administrative discharge with a “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” characterization of service, when the less favorable “Under Other Than Honorable” characterization could have been used.

The Applicant has requested a change in his discharge characterization to “Honorable”. For the edification of the Applicant, w hen the quality of a member’s service has met the standards of accepted conduct and performance of duty for military personnel , it is appropriate to characterize that service under “H onorable ” conditions. A “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance outweighs positive aspects of the member’s military record. The NDRB determined th e awarded characterization of service is appropriate considering the serious nature of the Applicant’s misconduct and an upgrade would be inappropriate.



Issues 4-5 (Equity). The NDRB does not have jurisdiction over matters involving pay. The Applicant is advised to contact the Defense Finance and Accounting Serv i ce (DFAS) at 1-800-962-0648 or review the DFAS website at www.dfas.mil for further information . The Applicant may also want to contact the Personnel Support Detachment which maintained his service record at the time of discharge. The Applicant’s records should be retained there for at least two years following discharge.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901261

    Original file (ND0901261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation:From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500868

    Original file (ND0500868.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801214

    Original file (ND0801214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Applicants argument that he was wrongfully discharged nine days prior to his EAOS is also without merit since MILPERSMAN 1910 – 152 allows for separation of a member any time during their career if there is a determination of alcohol treatment failure.Based on a review of the evidence the Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000473

    Original file (ND1000473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Nondecisional issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in his characterization of service at discharge in order to continue his education and to re-enter military service as an officer.2. Based on the arrest and conviction for the second DUI, the Applicant’s command determined that the Applicant was an Alcohol Treatment Failure in accordance with Article 1910-152 of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001171

    Original file (ND1001171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a detailed review of the Applicant’s discharge package and supporting documentation, coupled with a review of the medical records and alcohol treatment program documentation, the NDRB determined that the Applicant was an Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment program failure, that processing for separation was mandatory, and that the discharge was proper as issued. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000830

    Original file (ND1000830.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200465

    Original file (ND1200465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900872

    Original file (ND0900872.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001337

    Original file (ND1001337.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Upon review of the administrative separation package, the Separation Authority determined that separation was warranted pursuant to Article 1910-152 (Alcohol Treatment Failure) and further directed that the Applicant receive a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service and be assigned a re-entry code of RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment). The NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service at discharge.Based on a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902427

    Original file (ND0902427.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his overall record of performance and the requirements in section 1910-152 of the MILPERSMAN, the Board determined the Applicant’s characterization of service should be upgraded to Honorable. Since written direction from the command and appropriate counseling via specific documentation is required to enroll a service member in alcohol rehabilitation treatment, the Board presumed regularity in the conduct of government affairs as the Applicant failed to provide any evidence to the...