Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701071

Original file (ND0701071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN
ND07-001071

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070803 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT (PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-140

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. VA Benefits
                           2. Discharge was unjust and no one believed his side of the story

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT) .

Date: 20 080117             Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant implies that h is discharge was unjust and that no one believed his side of the story. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for ridicule or discipline. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. The Board found the Applicant’s service record incomplete. However, the Board noted that the Applicant completed ASAM Level .5 – IMPACT and was seen again by medical authority for Alcohol and Drug Screening due to an i ncident referral and recommend ed the Applicant attend ASAM Level 2-Intensive Outpatient Treatment for alcohol dependence . Additionally, the Applicant was reduced in rank on one occasion and was given a medical physical for confinement on another occasion. The Applicant’s Evaluation Report and Counseling Record documents that the Applicant found guilty of violation of Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful general order) and Article 134 (Indecent acts with another) . The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is conduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions . When a Sailor ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one known nonjudicial punishment ( NJP ) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful general order) and Article 134 (Indecent acts with another) . V iolation of Article 92 and 134 are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20050504 - 20050524              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20040525      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20060510
Length of Service : 1 Yrs 11 Mths 16 D ys Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 42          Highest Rank /Rate : SA
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 2.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 2.33
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): National Defense Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20041204:        Applicant completes ASAM Level .5 – IMPACT . Applicant was informed that the Command will discipline as appropriate and process for administrative separation those members whose alcohol-related misconduct is severe, who are repeated offenders, or who do not respond favorably to treatment.

20060126:        Applicant reduced in rank from SA to SR

20060207:        Medical Record: Alcohol and Drug Screening Report: Incident referral, recommend ASAM Level 2-Intensive Outpatient Treatment for alcohol dependence

20060313:        Medical Record: Applicant fit for confinement/fit for bread and water diet for 72 hours

20060508:        Evaluation Report and Counseling Record: Applicant found guilty of violation of Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful general order) and Article 134 (Indecent acts with another)

20060510:        DD-214 Narrative Reason for separation HKA- Admin Board waived.

Discharge Process

Not Found In Record

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective
26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 134.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900377

Original file (ND0900377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Was issued an RE-4 Code which makes him ineligible for reenlistment and the GI Bill.2.Chain of command misled him and discouraged him from requesting a court-martial.3. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801214

Original file (ND0801214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the Applicants argument that he was wrongfully discharged nine days prior to his EAOS is also without merit since MILPERSMAN 1910 – 152 allows for separation of a member any time during their career if there is a determination of alcohol treatment failure.Based on a review of the evidence the Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600746

Original file (ND0600746.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Therefore, a documentary review was conducted, and the Applicant is not eligible for further review by this Board. At this time, there is not sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400511

Original file (ND1400511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation failure, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700046

Original file (ND0700046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ENFA, USNND07-00046Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20061018Characterization of Service:Reason for Discharge: ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE Discharge Authority:MILPERSMAN1910-152Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues (as summarized by NDRB):1. By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. In light of the Applicant’s documented 2 retention warnings, 3 nonjudicial...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801610

Original file (ND0801610.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801671

Original file (ND0801671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Supporting documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s or other financial institutions;...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900011

Original file (MD0900011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs concerning , and regarding .The Applicant contends his discharge should be upgraded because he was pending a medical discharge and that his Company Commander lied to him.Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.In reviewing...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000512

Original file (ND1000512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801957

Original file (ND0801957.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service or grade. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701071

Similar Decisions