Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700975
Original file (ND0700975.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AR, USN
ND07-00975
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070706   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE/CONDUCT        Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630200

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1 . Applicant does not feel he should have been discharged because of his injured back.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE/CONDUCT .

Date: 20 080103                   Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: ( ). The Applicant contends that he should not have been discharged because of his injured back. The record reflects that the Applicant was issued a retention warning for a negative attitude and refusal to return to training after an appointment with mental health. The Applicant was seen by competent medical authority which resulted in a diagnosis of an Adjustment Disorder . A fter appropriate counseling and warning, the record reflects that the Applicant was unable to perform satisfactorily and was therefore administratively separated.

The Applicant should be aware that, b y regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than 6 months in the military prior to notification of separation to warrant a change of discharge to general (under honorable conditions) . Therefore the Board found his uncharacterized characterization appropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19910821 - 19920713              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19920714      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 19920806
Length of Service :    Yrs    Mths 23 D ys      Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 39          Highest Rank /Rate : AR
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance:       (    )   Behavior:       (    )      OTA:      
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE




Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19920720 :        Retention Warning for Demotivated, negative attitude . Applicant refused to return to training after mental health unit evaluation.

19920720 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Psych Eval
         Diagnosis: Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with mixed emotional features
                  Axis II: Immature/Dependant Personality traits
                  Axis III: Back pain, by history
          Recommendation: Entry Level Separation based on adjustment disorder. In addition, he concealed information at enlistment concern prior psychiatric hospitalization.

19920730:        Applicant found in violation of Warning issued 19920720.


Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       19920731
Reason for Discharge:    
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19920731
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19920731 )
Separation Authority (date):     Commanding Officer, RTC, San Diego ( 19920731 )
 Reason for discharge directed: 
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19920806

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), 15 June 1987 until 4 March 1993, Article 3630200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE CONDUCT

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700058

    Original file (ND0700058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not warrant a change in the Applicant’s characterization of service. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19911002Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATIONDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 19911002Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board Separation Authority...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00003

    Original file (ND02-00003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because the reason listed was "ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE/CONDUCT" The applicant's behavior, attitude and conduct were always, according to his Company Commanders, very good. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930216 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00751

    Original file (ND99-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This personality disorder existed prior to enlistment and is likely to continue even beyond discharge from military service. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980911 with an uncharacterized service by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A). The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until PRESENT, Article 1910-154 (Previously 3630200), Separation by Reason of Entry...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501372

    Original file (ND0501372.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 941021: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge, if approved the description of service will be entry level separation or the least favorable characterization of service as general by reason of entry level performance/failure to adapt to a military environment. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during her less...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00946

    Original file (ND99-00946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980413: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of entry level performance and conduct - failure to adapt to the Military environment. 980715: CO, FLEASWTRACEN, San Diego advised BUPERS that applicant was discharged on 13 March 1998 [DD 214 states discharge date of 15 Apr 98] with an uncharacterized discharge by reason of entry level performance and conduct - failure to adapt to the military environment. The applicant’s discharge shall change to General Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00077

    Original file (ND00-00077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00077 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991021, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable and the reason for discharge be changed to medical condition. No know medical or psychiatric reason for this service member not to be declared fit for full duty world wide as long as command accepts his reading difficulty as noted above.990720: Psychiatry ER: Impression: 1) Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, 2) v...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601096

    Original file (ND0601096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.19921001: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: (6 specifications): Between 19920921 – 19920923 and 19921001, fail to go on 6 occasions.Article 92: Dereliction in duty, wrongfully sleeping in classAward: Forfeiture of $100.00 for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDUREDate Notified:19921204Reason for Discharge:MISCONDUCT - MISCONDUCT - Least Favorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600743

    Original file (ND0600743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970805 by reason of by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A) with a service characterization of uncharacterized.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601188

    Original file (MD0601188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AXIS III: None known Recommendation: Although he is fit for full duty, he has a severe personality disorder that renders him unsuitable for continued military service. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19950121: Applicant’s SF93, Record of Medical History, indicates “No” answers to “Have you ever attempted suicide?” and “Have you ever had or have you now depression or excessive worry?” Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00019

    Original file (ND99-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Returned to duty.970307: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Accordingly, SR (applicant's) discharge is approved per reference (a).” PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970314 with an uncharacterized service by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances...