Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700058
Original file (ND0700058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-SR, USN
ND07-00058


Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:                               20 061016
         Characterization of Service:             
         Reason for Discharge :                      ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION (UNCHARACTERIZED)
         Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 3630200
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    RTC NTC SAN DIEGO, CA

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change to:              
        
Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
         Representation:                             
         Issues (as summarized by NDRB):           1. Post – Volunteer during times of disaster
                                                     
        

Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .    
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall .

Date of Decision:                                            20 070823
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   

Complete Medical Record:                          

Complete Discharge Package:                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     

Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        


Discussion

Decisional Issues:


Issue 1 ( ): The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacteri zation of a discharge. However there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review is considered. The Applicant submitted his statement of volunteering in times of disasters as docu mentation of his post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not warrant a change in the Applicant’s characterization of service .

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character ization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. The Applicant was properly diagnosed by competent medical authority with a n adjustment disorder of such severity to deem the Applicant as ha ving potential to do harm t o self or others and was subsequently properly discharged in accordance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual.

For the information of the Applicant, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a servicemember’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than one month in the U. S. Navy to warrant such a change.

The Applicant should also be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.



Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                19910619 - 19910916
Active:                                                                                                  

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19910917
Years Contracted :                                  
Date of Discharge:                                  19911008
Length of Service
         Active:                                      00 Yrs 00 Mths 22 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Time Lost During This Period:            

Education Level:
                                  
Age at this Enlistment:                                     18
AFQT:                                                 57
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   SR

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
                                                      Performance : N/A Behavior : N/A OTA : N/A

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL


Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

199109 30 :        Recruit Evaluation Unit, NTC, SAN DIEGO. Applicant interviewed after referral from NHSD where he had been evalu ated on 19910929 after threaten ing suicide .
         Diagnosis:
         AXIS I: Adjustment disorder with depressed mood.
         AXIS II: Immature/dependent personality traits.
         AXIS III: No known contributing physical illness.
         Recommendation:
Entry Level Separation. If retained this recruit is a potential risk for self-harm. May return to this REU per “No Harm Contact”.

19911001:        Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of UCMJ, Navy rules and regulations, demotivated, negative attitude, improper conduct/behavior, depressed , cries, not motivated , constantly talks about killing self, cannot follow simple inst ructions ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.


Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified :                                        19911002
Reason for Discharge    
        
Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :     ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 19911002
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Obtain Copies of Documents                
Submit Statement(s)
(date)                         
Administrative Board                      

Separation Authority (date):      COMMANDING OFFICER, RECRUIT TRAINING COMMAND, SAN DIEGO ( 19911003 )
         Reason for discharge directed :            
         Characterization directed:                         ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION
Date Applicant Discharged:                         19911008


Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:                               16

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :  

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                                           Finances:        
         Health/Medical Records:                             Substance Abuse:        
         Family/Personal Status:                   
         Education:       
        Community Service Efforts:               
         References:     
         Criminal Records:                         


Other:
         Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:    
        Other Documentation (Describe)                  


Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), 15 June 1987 until 4 March 1993, Article 3630200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF ENTRY LEVEL PERFORMANCE CONDUCT

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .





ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at http://Boards.law.af.mil .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment
/ Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

        
                           Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700975

    Original file (ND0700975.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19910821 - 19920713Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19920714Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19920806Length of Service: Yrs Mths23 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001697

    Original file (ND1001697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board noted the Applicant’s service records were incomplete, however, the Board conducted a thorough review of the available records to determine whether discharge and the discharge process met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601188

    Original file (MD0601188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AXIS III: None known Recommendation: Although he is fit for full duty, he has a severe personality disorder that renders him unsuitable for continued military service. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19950121: Applicant’s SF93, Record of Medical History, indicates “No” answers to “Have you ever attempted suicide?” and “Have you ever had or have you now depression or excessive worry?” Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00019

    Original file (ND99-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Returned to duty.970307: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Accordingly, SR (applicant's) discharge is approved per reference (a).” PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970314 with an uncharacterized service by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700140

    Original file (ND0700140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19920903 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING OFFICER, RECRUIT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00946

    Original file (ND99-00946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    980413: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of entry level performance and conduct - failure to adapt to the Military environment. 980715: CO, FLEASWTRACEN, San Diego advised BUPERS that applicant was discharged on 13 March 1998 [DD 214 states discharge date of 15 Apr 98] with an uncharacterized discharge by reason of entry level performance and conduct - failure to adapt to the military environment. The applicant’s discharge shall change to General Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00751

    Original file (ND99-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This personality disorder existed prior to enlistment and is likely to continue even beyond discharge from military service. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980911 with an uncharacterized service by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A). The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until PRESENT, Article 1910-154 (Previously 3630200), Separation by Reason of Entry...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600743

    Original file (ND0600743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970805 by reason of by reason of entry level performance and conduct (A) with a service characterization of uncharacterized.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201530

    Original file (ND1201530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his misconduct was a result of not being able to work within his rate.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900905

    Original file (ND0900905.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However the NDRB determined the narrative reason of Personality Disorder to be most appropriate in light of the medical evidence discussed supra ,which indicates the Applicant did have a Personality Disorder and was judged to represent a risk to himself or others if retained on active duty.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...