Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700781
Original file (ND0700781.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-IC3, USN
ND07-00781
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070518   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT     Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Isolated incident in 6 yrs of good conduct
2. Post service

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 080110                      Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

 Issue 1 (Equity). Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in six years of good conduct and infallible service. The NDRB advises the Applicant that, despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant's misconduct is documented in his service record, which is marred by the finding at a non - judicial punishment (NJP) proceeding on 2002 1217 by a violation of UCMJ Article 112a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. Although discharge for one violation of the UCMJ may seem harsh, that violation was for abuse of a controlled substance. Individuals are indoctrinated from the day of recruitment and have had the policy reinforced through annual Navy-wide training sessions, throughout their enlistment on the U.S Navy’s zero tolerance policy for substance abuse and that a violation of this policy will result in mandatory processing for administrative separation which usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge. This policy is well known throughout both the Department of Defense and the civilian sector as well. Accordingly, this misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. No other narrative reason for separation or characterization could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged.

Issue 2 (Equity) . Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the Navy . The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant contends that he is in his last semester at the University of West Florida and has submitted documentation of his attainment of Ass ociate Degree (s) in Arts and Applied Science . However , at this time, sufficient documentation has not been provided for the Board to consider relief on this basis.
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that





Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 960910-021202 ”
         “GKK”
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.



Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      NONE               Active: 19960910 - 20001203
Active: 20001204 - 200 21202
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20021203      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 20030325
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 03 Mths 22 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: Illegible   Highest Rank /Rate : IC 2
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 5.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 4.0 ( 1 )                  OTA: 4.14
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM (2), MUC, NER (4), GCM, NDSM, AFEM, SSDR, ERM, EPSM, ESWS

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20021203:        Reenlisted this date for a term of 3 years.

20021209 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20021204, tested positive for (THC).

 20021217 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of a controlled substance .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 1,101.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR (E-4), Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20030106
Reason for Discharge:     -
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20030106
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       

Administrative Board Date :       20030224
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY - .
          BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
 Recommendation on Separation:   BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20030303 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, CARRIER GROUP SIX ( 20030311 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20030325

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800930

    Original file (MD0800930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant’s petition for clemency does not offer a very compelling case for upgrading his discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service awarded at his Special Court Martial was an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801674

    Original file (ND0801674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a personal statement and as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900845

    Original file (MD0900845.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The command did not refer the Applicant for a court-martial but opted instead for an administrative discharge.The Board determined the characterization of service received, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, and the Discharge Process, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A....

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700240

    Original file (MD0700240.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Clemency. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense that he committed. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700189

    Original file (MD0700189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant violated the UCMJ. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for discipline.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900260

    Original file (ND0900260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Applicant’s counsel has submitted affidavits and in-service records for the Board’s consideration.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, will change the reason for discharge and characterization of service, if such a change is warranted. The Applicant’s counsel has requested an upgrade in the characterization of service to “Honorable ” . Therefore the request to remit the administrative discharge due to drug use...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200782

    Original file (MD1200782.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301497

    Original file (MD1301497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s records, the NDRB determined clemency was not warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700825

    Original file (MD0700825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant, while assigned as the unit Equal Opportunity representative, fraternized with, attempted to commit adultery with, sexually harassed and indecently assaulted a junior, subordinate, female Marine. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001113

    Original file (ND1001113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough...