Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700520

Original file (ND0700520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN
ND07-00520

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070313 Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-140

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Applicant request RE-code change
2 . Applicant claims he was not aware he was being discharged for Article 112a (wrongful use of a
Controlled substance) Applicant claims he was never convicted of Article 112a.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 071115 Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue(s) 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ) : There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant ’ s claim of not being aware he was being discharged for Article 112a and that he was never convicted of wrongful use and possession of a controlled substance, do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The record reflects the Applicant was the subject of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 20010308 and was found guilty of v iolation of Uniform Code of Military Justice ( UCMJ ) Article 86 (unauthorized absence more than 30 days) and Article 1 12a (wrongful use, possession of a controlled substance) . These violations are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: NONE                              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19980912               Years Contracted :        Date of Discharge: 20020222
Length of Service : Active: 03 Yrs 00 Mths 00 D ys          Inactive: : 00 Yrs 05 Mths 12 Dys
Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 26          Highest Rank /Rate : SN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 3.17
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SSDR, AFEM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19990223:        Applicant to active duty for 3 years.

20010119:        Applicant to unauthorized absence

20010221:        Applicant from unauthorized absence (33 days U/A)

20010223:        Applicant to unauthorized absence

20010307:        Applicant from unauthorized absence (12 days U/A)

200103 08 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 (2 specs - (1) Unauthorized absence ( 33 days , 11 hours, 10 minutes), (2) Unauthorized absence ( 12 days, 11 hours, 19 minutes. ), Art. 112a - Wrongful use and possession of c ocaine .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 584.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

20010419 :        Retention Warning for nonjudicial punishment received on 20010308 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge:
Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Administrative Board Date , if any :       NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for discharge directed:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20020222 (In Absentia)

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 16 July 2001 until 21 August 2002,
Article 1910-146, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 and Article 112a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601196

Original file (ND0601196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020222Reason for Discharge due to: due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020222Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20020214)Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, USS SPRUANCE (DD 963) (20020214)Narrative reason...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501082

Original file (MD1501082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COURT-MARTIAL. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700569

Original file (MD0700569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000712 - 20000729Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000730Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20020612Length of Service: 01 Yrs 10Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: 22 Days Confined: Education...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700156

Original file (MD0700156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990730 - 20000820Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000821Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20030210 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 05Mths10 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 31MOS:3381Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 3.8(7)/3.8(7)Fitness reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601105

Original file (MD0601105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-Pvt, USMCMD06-01105Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060815Narrative Reason for Separation: COURT-MARTIALCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 1105Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: MWSS-371 MWSG-37 3DMAW MCAS YUMA AZApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070706 Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901132

Original file (MD0901132.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. MISCONDUCT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901331

Original file (ND0901331.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600906

Original file (ND0600906.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs, a violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700243

Original file (ND0700243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20020226 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20020328) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM MILLINGTON TN (20020404)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601074

Original file (MD0601074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20050912Basis for Discharge: MISCONDUCT DUE TO Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050912Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS(20050923) SJA...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700520

Similar Decisions