Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601074
Original file (MD0601074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
MD06-01074

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060808
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       SACO soi, trngcmd, cAMP LEJEUNE NC

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NONE REQUESTED      
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                             20 0706 28
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
 Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

 By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall M ISCONDUCT



Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMC R (DEP)                               20040420 - 20040912
Active: NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20040913
Years Contracted :                                   ;      
Date of Discharge:                                  20051026
Length of Service:                                  01 Yrs 01 Mos 14 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                      142
Days Unauthorized Absence:                         1 42

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 51
MOS:                                                   9900
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   PVT

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 P roficiency :                                         4.3
Conduct :                                              1.4

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
SHARPSHOOTER RIFLE BADGE, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL



Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20050205:        To unauthorized status.

20050213:        From unauthorized status.

 20050215 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: UA from 0900, 20050205 to 1500, 20050213 (7 days).
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 288 for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days.
          Not appealed.

20050215:        Applicant’s statement admitting drug abuse while UA .

20050216:        Applicant’s urinalysis consent statement.
20050306:        To unauthorized status.

20050402:        From unauthorized status.

200504 0 6 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86 : UA from 1645, 20050306 to 1514, 20050402 (26 days).
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 617 for 2 months, restriction for 60 days.
          Not appealed.
 20050416:        To unauthorized status.

20050516:        Applicant declared deserter.

20050521:        From unauthorized status. Removed from Deserter status (surrendered).

20050526 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86 : UA from 1800, 20050416 to 1913, 20050521 (35 days).
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 617 for 2 month(s), restriction for 60 days.
          Not appealed.
20050603:        To unauthorized status.

20050814:        From unauthorized status.

20050819 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 86: UA from 2000, 20050603 to 1500, 20050814 (71 days).
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 617 for 2 months, restriction for 60 days.
          Not appealed.

 20050822 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20050818, tested positive for cocaine.
20050825 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 112a : On or between 20050715 and 20050816, knowingly and wrongfully used cocaine .
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 617 for 2 month (s) , restriction for 60 days.
         Not a ppealed.
20050913:        Applicant’s voluntary statement.

20050916:        Applicant signed statement of understanding for substance abuse at a VA Medical Center.



Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation
20050916:        Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program (SARP) consultation sheet. Applicant was evaluated to rule out substance abuse/dependence. No substance abuse indicated at this time. No substance use treatment indicated at this time. Recommend applicant be processed for administrative separation. Applicant denied chronic or habitual use of controlled substances.


Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                 
Date Notified :                                        20050912
Basis for Discharge :                                MISCONDUCT DUE TO
                                                     
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation :   
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                          YES
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20050912
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s) (date)                               

Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ( 20050923 )
SJA review (date):                                   ( 20051014 )
Discharge directed by (date):              COMMANDING GENERAL , MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJUENE ( 20051021 )
Narrative reason directed :                                   MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20051026


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              1
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0

Total Number of Pages:                              1

D escription of Other Documentation:

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. To be able to re-join the military.
2. Unfair discharge characterization because of immaturity at time of offense.

Issue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to page one of the Addendum regarding this issue.

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue 2 for consideration.

Issue 2 (Equity). The Applicant contends that his problems are attributed to his immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The record indicates that he admitted his repeated drug use for the purpose of being discharge from the Marine Corps. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.

When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86 and one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 112a. Violations of UCMJ Article 86 ( over thirty days ) and Article 112a are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

 None
A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

 C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, U nauthorized absence for more than 30 days and . Article 112a, Wrongful use, possession, etc., of a controlled substance .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101867

    Original file (MD1101867.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory.The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 29 December 2005. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700066

    Original file (MD0700066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified: 20050511Basis for Discharge: due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050511 Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (UNDATED)SJA review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700172

    Original file (ND0700172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1.In Service - Equity DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall . Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20050509 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (NA) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20050513) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM (20050519)Reason for discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601154

    Original file (MD0601154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was a guilty plea and finding at a Summary Court Martial for Article 86 (over 30 days), Article 92 and Article 134. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801551

    Original file (MD0801551.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801766

    Original file (MD0801766.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601227

    Original file (MD0601227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Issue 1: The Board determined that this issue is not and issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the applicant petitioned. (20050614) SJA review (date): (20051012)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601062

    Original file (ND0601062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20050502Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050502Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Administrative Board Date: NOT APPLICABLERecommendation of Commanding Officer (date): Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDER, SUBMARINE SQUADRON 15...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801068

    Original file (MD0801068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADMINISTRATIVE CORRECTIONS TO THE APPLICANT’S DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on the original DD Form 214. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801152

    Original file (MD0801152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was no evidence in the record, nor was any submitted by the Applicant, documenting he was not responsible for his actions or that the misconduct should be excused based on youth and immaturity. Again, the Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews :...