Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700312

Original file (ND0700312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN
ND07-00312

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070117 Characterization Received: (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION)
Narrative Reason: FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE (OTHER) Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-134

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1 . Upgrade reenlistment Code
2.       Characterization of service inequitable-want to use GI Bill
3.       Post service

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION) .

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE (OTHER) .

Date: 20071018 Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1. The Board does not have the authority to grant the relief Applicant is seeking. Therefore, the Applicant is directed to the attached Addendum for information regarding Reenlistment/RE-code.

Issue 2 ( Equity ). By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than 6 months in the military prior to notification of separation to warrant a change of discharge to honorable. T he Applicant admitted that he failed to disclose to the recruiter that he had been diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and prescribed Ritalin, which he had been taking since age nine. Furthermore, he indicated on his E nlistment P hysical Form DD2807 that he was not currently prescribed any medications. But for the Applicant’s failure to disclose these facts, he most likely would not have been allowed to enlist in the Navy . Based on the evidence presented by the Applicant and contained in the service/medical records, the Board found his uncharacterized discharge appropria te .

The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to non - service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is not considered as an unfavorable discharge.

Issue 3 ( ). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge . However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review is considered. The Applicant provided one letter of recommendation from his employer as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the conduct that resulted in the un characteriz ed discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found tha t

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20030505 - 20030721              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20030722      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20031010
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 02 Mths 19 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 64          Highest Rank /Rate : SR
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A     OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20030829 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Applicant revealed prior psychiatric treatment and revealed a psychotropic medication history.
         Diagnosis: Attention Deficit disorder, not otherwise specified, EPTE.
         Recommendation: Entry level separation

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20030909
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -
Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20030922
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( NOT FOUND IN RECORD )
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 200209XX )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, NAVAL SERVICE TRAINING COMMAND, GREAT LAKES ( 20030923 )
Reason for discharge directed:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20031010

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until
25 January 2004, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700193

Original file (MD0700193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discharge Process Date Notified: 20060118 Basis for Discharge:FRAUDULENT ENTRYCommanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATIONDate Applicant Responded to Notification:20060118Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) WAIVED Administrative Board Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING OFFICER, SPECIAL TRAINING COMPANY (20060118) Basis for discharge directed: FRAUDULENT ENTRY DUE TO UNDISCLOSED HISTORY OF...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800146

Original file (MD0800146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20070227 - 20070417 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070418Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 20071012Length of Service: Yrs Mths25 DysEducation Level: 15Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 94MOS: 8000 Highest Rank: PFCProficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214): NONEPeriods of UA/CONF: NJPs:6105...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501006

Original file (ND1501006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900504

Original file (ND0900504.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB rejects the Applicant’s contention and determined the Applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable; a change to the narrative reason for discharge would be inappropriate.In response to the Applicant’s petition to upgrade her characterization of service, the Applicant should understand with respect to non-service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an “Uncharacterized” separation is considered the equivalent...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500574

Original file (ND1500574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700358

Original file (MD0700358.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20000316 - 20000327 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000328Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20001003 Length of Service: 00 Yrs 06Mths06 Dys Lost Time: Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800067

Original file (MD0800067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19980516 - 19990414 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990415Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 19990504Length of Service: 00 Yrs 00Mths20 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:19AFQT: 39MOS: 9900 Highest Rank: PVT Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF:...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500254

Original file (MD1500254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included an entry level administrative discharge from the Marine Corps for reason of a Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE....
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700173

Original file (ND0700173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issue 2 (): The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700280

Original file (ND0700280.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20010319 - 20011109ELS (Declined Enlistment)Active: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20041207 - 20041214 COG Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20041215Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20041229 Length of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700312

Similar Decisions