Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700250
Original file (ND0700250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-SWCN, USN
ND07-00250
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061220   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-152

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Immature at time of service
 2. Discharge unjust
                                                     
Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE .

Date: 20 070927 Location:         Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue 1: ( ). The Applicant contends that his problems were attributed to his immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Sailor’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by four documented occasions of violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and nonparticipation in Level 1 treatment for alcohol abuse. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant was assigned to receive alcohol abuse treatment at an Addiction Treatment Facility as a result of being in an Unauthorized Absence status on four separate occasions. Per MILPERSMAN 1910-152, a ny member, who fails to participate in a prescribed alcohol treatment plan, is considered a treatment failure and commands shall process for separation all members considered failures unless a written waiver is obtained.


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20000524 - 20000531              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20000601      Years Contracted : ; Extension: 13 MONTHS          Date of Discharge: 20020906
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 03 Mths 05 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 34          Highest Rank /Rate : SWCN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 1.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 2.33
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, NAVY E. RIBBON, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL






Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20001129:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0630 on 20001129.

20001129:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0730 on 20001129 (1hr/surrendered).
20010122:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 20010122.

20010122:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0940 on 20010122 (2hrs/40mins/surrendered).
20010 220 :        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 20010 220 .

20010 220 :        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0 830 on 20010 220 ( 1hrs/3 0mins/surrendered).
20010306:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0900 on 20010306.

20010306:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0940 on 20010306 (1hr/surrendered).

200 2 070 1 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Being UA 4 X in the last 2 months ETOH involved.
         Diagnosis: Alcohol Abuse
         Recommendation: Outpatient , Level I Treatment for ETOH Abuse

20020726:        Branch Medial Clinic NCB. Admin Note: 22 y/o male which I observed during TX @ SARP consequently disenrolled for nonparticipation, displayed characteristics of adjustment & antisocial behavior. MBR stated getting a rush from fighting & enjoys it. Consulted to Mental Health to eval for Personality D/O.
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge:    
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):       
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for discharge directed: 
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20020906










Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700200

    Original file (ND0700200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19930803 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930811) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19930817)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00051

    Original file (ND00-00051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. P: Level II treatment recommended.911125: Medical: Applicant reinterviewed and still concluded applicant is abusive of ETOH not dependent at this time. 920807: Commanding officer recommended discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of Misconduct,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01219

    Original file (ND04-01219.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Clermont Recovery Center General Release Form, dated April 15, 2004 (3 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 010323 - 010328 COG Active: None Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600862

    Original file (ND0600862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.880318: Applicant released from initial tour of active duty for training with an Honorable by reason of completion of required active service (USMCR) IADT.880321: Enlistment contract into the USNR documents acknowledgement of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801428

    Original file (ND0801428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s records should be retained there for at least two years following discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801214

    Original file (ND0801214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Applicants argument that he was wrongfully discharged nine days prior to his EAOS is also without merit since MILPERSMAN 1910 – 152 allows for separation of a member any time during their career if there is a determination of alcohol treatment failure.Based on a review of the evidence the Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700086

    Original file (ND0700086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: DiscussionDecisional Issues: In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20030715Reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701042

    Original file (ND0701042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Charge and Specification: Article 86.Preferred: 19990325Court-martial: 19990419 Findings: Guilty of Article 86Sentence: BCD - Conf 90 days; FOP - $600/month for three months; CA action: 19990716NC&PB Action: NONEAppellate Review Complete: 20001121 BCD ordered executed: 20001129Applicant Discharged: 20001129 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902006

    Original file (ND0902006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is the NDRB’s finding that the Applicant’s service did not meet the conditions for an Honorable discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shallremain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00796

    Original file (ND03-00796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Statement from Applicant, undated Ten pages from Applicant’ service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 971220 - 971221 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...