Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700163

Original file (ND0700163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AN, USN
ND07-00163

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20061120 Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-120

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Education
                           2. Post Service
                           3. Characterization Inequitable

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY .

Date: 20 0709 13 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

Issue 1: either an Issue which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 : ( ). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no character statement s or career achievements as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the lack of documentation provided by the Applicant did not provide justification to upgrade the characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions) to Honorable.

Issue 3 : ( ). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The NDRB reviewed all of the available records, supporting documents, facts, elements of discharge, evidence submitted by the Applicant, and circumstances unique to this case. The Board found that the Applicant’s discharge for a Condition, not a disability was proper. Per MILSPERSMAN (Chapter 1 1, para 1920-304) , c haracterization of th is type of discharge is honorable if the member’s service generally met the standard of acceptable conduct and performance. The Board found no documentation in the record that was adverse . T he Board determined that the discharge characteriz ation of General (Under Honorable Conditions ) was inequitable and therefore directs the Applicant’s Discharge is characterized by “Honorable”.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20031015 - 20040728              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20040729      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20051117
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 03 Mths 19 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 73          Highest Rank /Rate : AN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: 2.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 2.00
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, 9MM PISTOL SHOT MARKSMANSHIP RIBBON (MARKSMAN)

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20050929:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Psychiatric evaluation.
         Diagnosis: Sleepwalking disorder.
         Recommendation: Routine administrative separation based on the presence of a condition that is disqualifying for continued service in the Navy.

20051001:        Retention Warning: Medical authorities have diagnosed you as having a sleepwalking disorder. This condition is disqualifying for continued naval service. This sleepwalking disorder is of such severity as to interfere with your ability to adequately serve in the United States Navy. Your potential for future active naval service to the United States Navy is considered inadequate.

20051028 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Psychiatric evaluation
         Diagnosis: Sleepwalking disorder
         Recommendation: After a thirty day evaluation period the clinical impression remains unchanged. Administrative recommendation is made on the basis of the sleepwalking disorder.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20051110
Reason for Discharge:     - PHYSICAL OF MENTAL CONDITION
Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20051110
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL AIR TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER ( 20051114 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20051117

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 25 May 2005 until Present, Article 1910-120, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITIONS.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601119

Original file (ND0601119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20010606Reason for Discharge due to: PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITIONSLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20010606Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): (20010606)Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL HOSPITAL CORPS SCHOOL (20010606)Narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800503

Original file (ND0800503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Therefore the Board found his uncharacterized characterization appropriate.The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to non-service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300408

Original file (MD1300408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In August 2011, competent medical authority diagnosed the Applicant with sleepwalking disorder, and his command administratively processed him for separation due to Condition, Not a Disability. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700080

Original file (ND0700080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendations: Administrative separation for the sleepwalking condition. ]19990916: Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital Corps School informed Commander NavyPersonnel Command of the Applicant’s discharge by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and convenience of the government –physical or mental conditions with a service characterization of entry level separation. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801848

Original file (MD0801848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant claims he should have received a medical discharge for an attempted suicide vice for a pattern of misconduct because he was suffering fromPTSD due to injuries received from an Improvised Explosive Device(IED) blast in Iraq.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board determined the awarded discharge...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101062

Original file (ND1101062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900996

Original file (MD0900996.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

This documentation contradicts his statement provided in the DD 293 that he never had a problem with sleep walking before enlisting and while at boot camp, andit supports the fraudulent enlistment determination.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500812

Original file (ND0500812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Propriety or Equity Issue(s): The Applicant was instructed to lie on his entrance physical by his recruiter.Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petitionThe Applicant in this case is a...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901584

Original file (ND0901584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant believes his discharge from the Navy was inequitable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700679

Original file (ND0700679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20030322 - 20031107Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031108Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050209Length of Service: 01 Yrs 03Mths02 DysLost Time:Days UA: 17 Days Confined: Education...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700163

Similar Decisions