Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700087
Original file (ND0700087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
FOR
ex-ABHAN, USN
ND07-00087
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

 Application Received:                               20 061026
         Characterization of Service:             
         Reason for Discharge :                      WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE
          Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 3620250
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    US NAS KEFLAVIK ICELAND

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change :                           
         Narrative Reason change :                          
         Review Requested:                         
         Representation:                             
         Issues (as summarized by NDRB):           1. Condition was a disability
                                                     
        
Decision:

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .    
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY .
Date of Decision:                                            20 070830
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package:                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        


Discussion

 Decisional Issues:

Issue 1 ( ): After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned an impropriety in the discharge process and an inequity in the Applicant’s characterization of service . Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 21, effective 01 Sep 98 until 0 5 Dec 01, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170 , separation by reason of weight control and/or physical readiness test failure , outlines the proper procedure for discharging a member by reason of weight control failure . The Board’s review of the record left substantial doubt in the mind s of the Board members that the process was properly conducted . Th e record contained no indication of administrative r emarks / counseling or placing the member on a command-directed physical conditioning program . An administrative remarks/counseling is mandatory following either the first or second PRT failure . The Board did not find a reference to the member’s statement of rebuttal or consent to the separation action. Additionally the commanding officer’s endorsement did not include a summary of action taken by the c ommand, reference to the member ’ s progress or lack thereof during the command directed physical conditioning program , nor counseling /retention warnings following the Applicant’s first or second PRT failure . The Board found the discharge process improper. B ased upon the improper processing the narrative reason for discharge shall change to “Secretarial Authority”.
With regards to the characterization of service T he MILPERSMAN defines “HONORABLE” service as: “ When the quality of the member’s service generally met the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for naval personnel. ” The Board found no negative evaluations, counseling’s or retention war nings in the Applicant’s record. Furthermore, the Applicant’s commanding officer’s letter to the discharging PSD directed his discharge “under Honorable conditions”. This statement created substantial doubt in the minds of the board members as to the CO’s intent. Th e board determined that relief is warranted based on an inequity in the Applicant’s characterization of service .


Summary of Service:

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                19941130 - 19950516
Active:                                             

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19950517
Years Contracted :                                  
Date of Discharge:                                  19980910
Length of Service
         Active:                                      03 Y rs 03 Mths 24 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Time Lost During This Period:            

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 54
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   ABHAN

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
                                                       Performance : N/A Behavior : N/A OTA : N/A

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON (2), FIRST GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL


Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

 19970502:        PRT results: weight 217 lbs, 22% body fat (1 st failure).
19971112:        PRT results: weight 239 lbs, 28% body fat (2 nd failure with unsat run time ).
19980430:        Section E, question 4d and e; based on medical examination this member is medically authorized to participate in the PRT with the exception of run/walk and swim, command directed physical conditioning program (with restrictions) .

19980502:        PRT results: weight 240 lbs, 28% body fat (3 rd failure , waiver of 1.5 mile run ).
19980612:        Administrative Remarks: Applicant advised of third official PRT failure.

19980623:        Applicant notified of his intended administrative discharge by reason of weight control failure with the least favorable characterization of service as General (under honorable conditions). No Administrative board entitlement as a result of less than six years of service.

19980623:        Applicant acknowledged his impending administrative discharge and waived his rights to speak to counsel, electing only to receive copies of the discharge package.

19980629:        Commanding Officer, US Naval Air Station Keflavik notified Bureau of Naval Personnel of the Applicant’s ad ministrative separation “under H onorable conditions” and his transfer to TPU Norfolk for processing.


Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified :    19980623
Reason for Discharge    
Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :    

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:        19980623
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel   
Obtain Copies of Documents      
Submit Statement (date)         
Administrative Board   
GCMCA Review   

Separation Authority (date):      COMMANDING OFFICER, U. S. NAVAL AIR STATION KEFLAVIK ( 19980629 )
Reason for discharge directed :   WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE
Characterization directed:       UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS
Date Applicant Discharged:       19980910


Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Total Number of Pages:                               10

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :  

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
          Employment:                                           Finances:        
         Health/Medical Records:                             Substance Abuse:        
         Family/Personal Status:                             Education:       
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:     
         Criminal Records:                         

Other:
          Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:    
         Other Documentation (Describe)             Department of Veterans Affairs decision (9 pages)


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 21, effective 01 Sep 98 until 5 Dec 01, MILPERSMAN Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF WEIGHT CONTROL AND/OR PHYSICAL READINESS TEST FAILURE.
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00940

    Original file (ND99-00940.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960405: Commanding Officer, USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN, advised BUPERS that member was discharged on 8 April 1996 with an Honorable by reason of weight control failure as evidenced by failing three physical readiness tests on 10 November 1994, May 1995 and November 1995. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960408 with a general (under honorable conditions) for weight control failure due to not meeting the prescribed physical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01130

    Original file (ND02-01130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service and medical records reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider.Department of Veterans Affairs, to Applicant, dated Jul 23, 2002, providing the DD Form 293 to the Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 950221 - 950314 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950315 Date of Discharge: 980310 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501243

    Original file (ND0501243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore advised that failure to show significant progress towards meeting Navy’s body fat standards, failure to achieve body fat standards during the 12-month aftercare period, or failure to maintain standards thereafter shall result in consideration for separation from the naval service.931108: Administrative remarks from Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine Base, Kings Bay, GA to EN2 C_ (Applicant). SNM is able to do PRT without any problems. Additionally, i n the Applicant’s case the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00676

    Original file (ND04-00676.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00676 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040315. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Comments on Performance: Block 36: (Military Bearing/Character) - Failed to meet body weight standard.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00538

    Original file (ND99-00538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I request the review board change my discharge to an Honorable discharge.. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Referral for Civilian Medical Care dtd 10/29/96 (Diagnosis - Lateral Meniscus tears) Weymouth MRI Diagnostic Centers Exam Report of 11/18/96 Orthopedic Clinic, Naval Hospital, Groton Consultation Health Record page Applicant's Separation Physical Examination of 9 Dec...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00245

    Original file (ND03-00245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00245 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason changed to Retired. Symptom – Pt stated history of active duty weight control. Under current standards, the Board found that the Applicant would not have been administratively separated by reason of weight control failure.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00215

    Original file (ND00-00215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 920610 Date of Discharge: 951114 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 05 05 (Doesn't exclude UA and confinement time) Inactive: None ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00744

    Original file (ND99-00744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall change to: HONORABLE /Other physical/mental conditions - obesity, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. He has a long standing history of non-compliance with Navy weight and appearance standards which is documented on his Enlisted Performance Evaluation. The character of the discharge shall change to Honorable based on the applicant’s service record.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01370

    Original file (ND97-01370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND97-01370 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 970904, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Members not meeting physical readiness standards shall be required to participate in the command-directed physical conditioning program (Level I), which must consist of an exercise component and should also include other Health Promotion Program elements. c. In the course of a discharge review, it is determined that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00390

    Original file (ND02-00390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00390 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. [Extracted from supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.] Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 12 Dec 97 until 31 Aug 98, Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF WEIGHT CONTROL AND/OR PHYSICAL READINESS TEST FAILURE.