Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00215
Original file (ND00-00215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND00-00215

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 991130, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000803. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620260.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. Request discharge be upgraded to Honorable as no criminal acts were involved requiring any courts martial or captains mast.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920610               Date of Discharge: 951114

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 05 (Doesn't exclude UA and confinement time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 64

 Highest Rate: AA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.72 (5)    Behavior: 3.6 (5)                 OTA: 3.4

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SWASM (w/1 Bronze Star)

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 28

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620260.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :
920114:  Enlistment Physical Examination Report. Initial HT - 71 inches, WT - 234 lbs, Build - Medium. Recheck on 920227: WT- 222 with BF - 24%.
930429:  Unauthorized absence from USS CONTELLATION, Mayport, FL. Intention unknown.

930527:  Returned to military control at 1230 to NAVMARCORESCEN Des Moines, IA and transferred to TPU, San Diego, CA awaiting return of USS CONSTELLATION homeport arrival.

930529:  USS CONSTELLATION declared applicant a deserter from been an unauthorized absentee since 0700, 29 Apr 93 from ship.

930722:  Returned on-board USS CONSTELLATION.
930908:  Summary Court Martial
 Charge: violation of UCMJ Article 86: UA from 93APR29 until 93MAY27 (28 days).
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $542.00 per month for 1 month, confinement for 24 days with 3 days bread and water, reduction to E-1. Accused not represented by legal counsel.
         CA 93SEP13: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

930908:  To confinement.

930929:  Applicant released from confinement and returned to full duty status. (21 days)
940429:  Risk Factor Screening/Physical Readiness Test Results: HT - 73", WT -225 lbs, BF - 26%. Failed body fat percentage.
941021:  Risk Factor Screening/Physical Readiness Test Results: HT - 72", WT -246 lbs, BF - 26%. Failed body fat percentage.

941130:  Counseling: Applicant advised that he failed to meet the physical readiness standards due to being measured at 24 percent body fat on 94NOV30 and failure of the PRT on 24OCT21. Placed on the command’s sponsored physical conditioning program. Sources of assistance included. Advised if this is the third failure in a four year period, you will be process for administrative separation (unless approved for a waiver by the Bureau of Naval Personnel).

950419:  Risk Factor Screening/Physical Readiness Test Results: HT - 73", WT -236 lbs, BF - 26%.

950520:  Counseling: Applicant advised of his failure of the physical readiness test (PRT) on 27JUL95. Enrolled on the command’s sponsored physical conditioning program. Sources of assistance included. Advised if this is the third failure in a four year period, you will be process for administrative separation (unless approved for a waiver by the Bureau of Naval Personnel).

960523:  Counseling: Applicant advised that he failed to meet physical readiness standards due to being measured at 26 percent body fat on 94Apr19 and enrolled in the command’s sponsored physical conditioning program. Sources of assistance included. Advised if this is the third failure in a four year period, you will be process for administrative separation (unless approved for a waiver by the Bureau of Naval Personnel).

950526:  Risk Factor Screening/Physical Readiness Test Results: HT - 70", WT -233 lbs, BF - 26%. Failed run portion of 14JUN95 PT.

951025:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of weight control failure as evidenced by failure to achieve prescribed physical readiness standards in April 1994, October 1994 and June 1995.
951030:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
960125:  Commanding officer advised BUPERS that applicant was discharged on 14 Nov 94 with general (under honorable conditions) by reason of weight control failure due to not being within the weight standards.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 951114 with a general (under honorable conditions) for weight control failure (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

In response to applicant’s issue 1, the applicant stated that he requests that his “ discharge be upgraded to Honorable as no criminal acts were involved requiring any courts martial or captains mast.” The Board found that the applicant went to Summary Court Martial on 8 September 1993 for violation of UCMJ Article 86: unauthorized absence. No relief will be granted concerning this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3620260, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURE

B. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 12, effective 21 Dec 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3420440, HEALTH AND PHYSICAL READINESS PROGRAM

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01130

    Original file (ND02-01130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service and medical records reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider.Department of Veterans Affairs, to Applicant, dated Jul 23, 2002, providing the DD Form 293 to the Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 950221 - 950314 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950315 Date of Discharge: 980310 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00940

    Original file (ND99-00940.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960405: Commanding Officer, USS LAKE CHAMPLAIN, advised BUPERS that member was discharged on 8 April 1996 with an Honorable by reason of weight control failure as evidenced by failing three physical readiness tests on 10 November 1994, May 1995 and November 1995. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960408 with a general (under honorable conditions) for weight control failure due to not meeting the prescribed physical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00245

    Original file (ND03-00245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00245 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason changed to Retired. Symptom – Pt stated history of active duty weight control. Under current standards, the Board found that the Applicant would not have been administratively separated by reason of weight control failure.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01201 (1)

    Original file (ND99-01201 (1).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's Statement to the Board Copy of DD Form 214 VA' decision on Applicant's claim dtd Sep 1, 1999 Copy of applicant's medical record (154 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 891209 - 951206 HON 860603 - 891208 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850607 - 860602 COG Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01201

    Original file (ND99-01201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's Statement to the Board Copy of DD Form 214 VA' decision on Applicant's claim dtd Sep 1, 1999 Copy of applicant's medical record (154 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 891209 - 951206 HON 860603 - 891208 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850607 - 860602 COG Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00538

    Original file (ND99-00538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I request the review board change my discharge to an Honorable discharge.. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Referral for Civilian Medical Care dtd 10/29/96 (Diagnosis - Lateral Meniscus tears) Weymouth MRI Diagnostic Centers Exam Report of 11/18/96 Orthopedic Clinic, Naval Hospital, Groton Consultation Health Record page Applicant's Separation Physical Examination of 9 Dec...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00390

    Original file (ND02-00390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00390 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020214, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. [Extracted from supporting documents submitted by the Applicant.] Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 12 Dec 97 until 31 Aug 98, Article 1910-170, SEPARATION BY REASON OF WEIGHT CONTROL AND/OR PHYSICAL READINESS TEST FAILURE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00744

    Original file (ND99-00744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall change to: HONORABLE /Other physical/mental conditions - obesity, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. He has a long standing history of non-compliance with Navy weight and appearance standards which is documented on his Enlisted Performance Evaluation. The character of the discharge shall change to Honorable based on the applicant’s service record.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00083

    Original file (ND99-00083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00083 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981014, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. Additionally , his overall service record warrants an Honorable discharge, regardless of the three PRT failures.In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue has merit. There is no documentation of any disciplinary action against him, other than the weight control problem, he was selected as the Junior...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01370

    Original file (ND97-01370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND97-01370 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 970904, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Members not meeting physical readiness standards shall be required to participate in the command-directed physical conditioning program (Level I), which must consist of an exercise component and should also include other Health Promotion Program elements. c. In the course of a discharge review, it is determined that...