Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700059
Original file (ND0700059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AOAN, USN
ND07-00059
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

 Application Received:                               20 061012
         Characterization of Service:             
         Reason for Discharge :                      ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE
         Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 1950-152
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    NAWS CHINA LAKE CA 93555

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change :                           
         Narrative Reason change :                          
         Review Requested:                         
         Representation:                             
         Issues (as summarized by NDRB):           1. Reenlist
                                                      2. The arrest which resulted in discharge was not an alcohol related                                                           incident, it was dismissed in civil court, did not consume alcohol and the                                                    fight was self defense
                                                     

Decision:

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .    
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE .
Date of Decision:                                            20 070830
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package:                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        


Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .


Issue 2 ( ): OPNAVINST 5350.4C directs that commands shall process for administrative separation all members considered to be alcohol treatment failures. A treatment failure is defined as any serious alcohol incident occurring at any time during his or her career subsequent to treatment. The Applicant completed substance abuse treat at Point Lom a in June of ’01, thereby becoming subject to the U. S. Navy’s rules regarding alcohol treatment failure. In the Applicant’s letter to the Board he states that he had not consumed alcohol and was merely acting in self defense when arrested for fighting in public. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support h is claim. The re is no evidence in the record nor has the Applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that his discharge was improper and he was in compliance with the terms of his alcohol treatment aftercare plan. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character ization of his service, reflects the Applicant’s failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls short of that required for an upgrade to his characterization of service.



Summary of Service:

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                19980826 - 19981122
Active:                                                                                                  

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19981123
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20020220
Length of Service
          Active:                                      03 Yrs 02 Mths 28 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Time Lost During This Period:             7 Days UA:

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 55
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   AOAA

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
                                                       Performance : 4.0 Behavior : 2.0 OTA : 3.04 (2)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NONE



Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

 20000420 :        Civil Conviction: [ Ridgecrest Municipal Court, Ridgecrest, CA ] for Driving Under Influence .
         Sentence: Fine $1547.00, 5 years probation, 48 hours jail time first offenders DUI program.

20000801 :        NJP for violation of the UCMJ:
         Article 80: Attempted damage of military property.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200.00 for 1 month (suspended for six months), extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-2.

20010412:        Interview with Dr. C_, Applicant recently arrested for open container violation with a BAC of .06.

20010604 :        Point Loma S ubstance A buse R ehabilitation D epartment .
         Diagnosis:       AXIS I: Alcohol Abuse (DSM-IV 305.00).
                 
200106 15 :        Applicant completed Outpatient Treatment Program for Alcohol Abuse at SARD Point Loma.

 200 20214 :        Civil Conviction: Fighting in public .
         Sentence: Fine $ 100 .00, 3 years probation [Extracted from Evaluation Report & Counseling Record Comments] .


Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified :                                        NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
        
Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :    

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Obtain Copies of Documents                
Submit Statement(s) (date)                         
Administrative Board                      
GCMCA Review                               

Commanding Officer R ecommendation (date):       
Separation Authority (date):      NOT FOUND IN RECORD
         Reason for discharge directed :            
         Characterization directed:                         NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20020220


Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Total Number of Pages:                               26

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :  

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
          Employment:                                           Finances:        
         Health/Medical Records:                             Substance Abuse:        
         Family/Personal Status:                             Education:       
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:     
         Criminal Records:                         

Other:
          Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:    
        Other Documentation (Describe)             Armitage Airfield Flight Line Operator's License, Adult CPR Certificate, Medical Examinier's Certificate


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 27, effective
27 Mar 2000 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00609

    Original file (ND04-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Identify an AA home group within 30 days of completing treatment. I recommend he be separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.”020808: Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group FIVE authorize the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600295

    Original file (MD0600295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00295 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051201. Medical Treatment Plan: SARD for ETOH dependence.000926: Medical evaluation at Medical Division, S.A.R.D. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600989

    Original file (ND0600989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20050825Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCT - alcohol abuse rehabilitation failureLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050825Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLEObtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLESeparation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700001

    Original file (ND0700001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20030418: NJP for violations of UCMJ: Article 134: Drunkenness Article 86: Unauthorized absence Elements of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601134

    Original file (ND0601134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20050531Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050531Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date):COMMANDER, NATIONAL NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER (20050621)Reason for discharge directed:Characterization directed: Date...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301269

    Original file (MD1301269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s alcohol rehabilitation failure, command administratively processed for separation. After considering the Applicant’s record of service in his current enlistment, the Separation Authority determined he met the bases of separation for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure and Pattern of Misconduct and further determined the primary basis for separation should be Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure with an Under Honorable Conditions (General) characterization of service. ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700080

    Original file (ND0700080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendations: Administrative separation for the sleepwalking condition. ]19990916: Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital Corps School informed Commander NavyPersonnel Command of the Applicant’s discharge by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and convenience of the government –physical or mental conditions with a service characterization of entry level separation. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700046

    Original file (ND0700046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-ENFA, USNND07-00046Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20061018Characterization of Service:Reason for Discharge: ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE Discharge Authority:MILPERSMAN1910-152Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues (as summarized by NDRB):1. By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. In light of the Applicant’s documented 2 retention warnings, 3 nonjudicial...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601064

    Original file (ND0601064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall -ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT.Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990414-19990509Active: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990510Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 19990602 Length of Service: 00Yrs 00 Mos 23 Days (does not exclude lost time, if any)Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 54Highest Rate/Rank:FRPerformance Evaluation Averages:NOT APPLICABLEAwards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701010

    Original file (ND0701010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, because the Applicant’s service record did not contain copy of the administrative separation package and the documents submitted by the Applicant appeared regular on its face, the Board considered the Applicant’s discharge in light of a recommendation for an honorable discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board...