Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700049

Original file (ND0700049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

FOR
ex-FR, USN
ND07-00049

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:                               20 061012
         Characterization of Service:
         Reason for Discharge :                      - due to PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT
         Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 1910-140
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    USS CORONADO (AGF 11)

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
         Representation:

Applicant’s Issues:
1. Youth and immaturity.
Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall due to PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

Date of Decision:                                            20 0708 23
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:
Complete Medical Record:
Complete Discharge Package:

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:

Issue 1 (Equity): The Applicant implies that his misconduct while in the Navy is attributable to his youth and immaturity at the time. While he may feel that immaturity was the underlying cause, the record clearly reflects the Applicant’s willful misconduct and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct, or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.

Honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the Sailor ’s service has met the standards of
accepted conduct and performance of duty for military personnel. W hen signific ant negative aspects of a Sailor ’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record , a General (Under Honorable Conditions) is normally the highest characterization that service member will receive . The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and nonjudicial punishment (Captains Mast) on four separate occasions for violation s of Articles 86, 92, and 121 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Violations of Art 92, Failure to obey a lawful order, and Article 121, Larceny, are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge would have been authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Court-Martial. Therefore, the Board decided that a n upgrade to honorable characterization would be inappropriate in this case.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge both proper and equitable.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                20000325 - 20000717
Active:

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20000718
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20020909
Length of Service
         Active:                                     02 Yrs 01 Mths 22 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Inactive:                                            NONE
         Time Lost During This Period:             Days UA: Days Confinement:

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 35
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   FN
Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
                                    Performance : 2.5 ( 2 ) Behavior : 2.5 ( 2 ) OTA : 2.58

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

20010425 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: Unauthorized absence 0700, 20010415, until 0515, 20010416 (22 hours) .
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 7 days.
         No indication of appeal in the record.

20010425:        Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency ( i.e., CO’s NJP on 20010425 for UA ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

20010621 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: Did on or about 2300, 20010612, without authority, abandon watch as a under instruction messenger on board USS CORONADO (AFG 11) .
         Award: F orf $300.00 for 1 mon , reduction in rate (suspended for 6 months), correction custody for 30 days.
         No indication of appeal in the record.

20010621:        Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency ( i.e., CO’s NJP held on 20010621 for UA ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

20020613 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 121 : Did, on or about 20020524, wrongfully appropriated a pair of Nike Air Jordan III Retro Blue tennis shoes, a value of about $135.00, the property of ITSN L_.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 618 .00 for 2 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 2 .
                  No indication of appeal in the record.

20020808 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 92 : Dereliction in the performance of duties.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 511 .00 for 1 month , restriction and extra duty for 30 days , reduction to E- 1 .
         No indic ation of appeal in the record.

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified :                                        20020814
Reason for Discharge     -

Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20020814
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel
Obtain Copies of Documents
Submit Statement(s) (date)
Administrative Board
GCMCA Review

Commanding Officer R ecommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):      COMMANDING OFFICER, USS CORONADO (AGF 11) ( 20020819 )
         Reason for discharge directed :             -
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20020909

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:                               12

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                                           Finances:
         Health/Medical Records:                            Substance Abuse:
         Family/Personal Status:                            Education:
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:
         Criminal Records:

Other:
         Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:
        Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 and Article 121 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed .

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00661

Original file (ND02-00661.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

ND02-00661 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020409, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.861105: Vacate suspended reduction to MMFN awarded at CO's NJP dated 10Oct86 due to continued misconduct.870514: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91 (2 specs): Disrespectful in language towards PO1 on 8 May 87, (2) Having received a lawful order from a PO1 to hold field day in 1...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600086

Original file (ND0600086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I therefore strongly recommend that EMFN G_ (Applicant) be separated from the naval service and that he receives an Other Than Honorable characterization of service.”010523: Commander, Amphibious Group TWO, authorize the Commanding Officer, USS BATAAN (LHD 5) that the Applicant will be discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. The names,...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500901

Original file (ND0500901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20011221 - 20020702 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20020703 Date of Discharge: 20040317 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08 15 Inactive: None The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The names, and votes...
NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00911

Original file (ND99-00911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant (2pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 850805 - 890803 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850329 - 850804 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890804 Date of Discharge: 930120 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 05...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601052

Original file (ND0601052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19911015Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19911015Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): 19911028 Discharge directed by (date):BUPERS 19911112Narrative reason directed:Characterization...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601144

Original file (ND0601144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20041022Reason for Discharge due to: due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20041022Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500960

Original file (ND0500960.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.941202: Retention Warning from USS CALIFORNIA (CGN 36): Advised of deficiency (Violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice Articles 86 (Failure to go to appointed place of duty) and 90 (Willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601200

Original file (ND0601200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030109Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030119Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20030102)Separation Authority (date):COMNAVAIRLANT NORFOLK VA (20030313)Narrative reason directed:Characterization...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601060

Original file (ND0601060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HA, USNND06-01060Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060808Narrative Reason for Separation: The Applicant’s DD214 states that the Narrative Reason for Separation is Pattern of Misconduct although the Separation Authority directed Commission of a Serious Offense. No indication of appeal in the record.19921023: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (You have failed to adhere to the rules of the Uniform Code of Military Justice pertaining to your misconduct...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501082

Original file (ND0501082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Furthermore, the record documents an unadjudicated violation of the UCMJ Article 86 (unauthorized absence in excess of 30 days, 204 days) prior to his discharge in absentia. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700049

Similar Decisions