Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700022

Original file (ND0700022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HR, USN
ND07-00022

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 061003
         Characterization of Service:
         Reason for Discharge :                      -
         Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 1910-142
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    NACC NEWPORT, RI

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
Representation:

Applicant’s i ssues :
1. In Service - Equity
2. Personal/Medical problems attributed to misconduct - Equity

Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall - .

Date of Decision:                                            20 070816
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:
Complete Medical Record:
Complete Discharge Package:

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:

Issue 1 ( ). When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member ’ s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member ’ s military record. T he Applicant ’ s service was marred by 3 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Articles 89 ( Disrespect towards a superior commissioned officer), 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation ) and 1 34 (Indecent language) of the UCMJ. The Applicant ’ s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of h er service, reflects h er willful failure to meet the requirements of h er contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of h er characterization of service.

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant contends that h er misconduct in the Navy can be attributed to h er personal/medical problems. While s he may feel that h er personal/medical problems were the underlying cause of h er misconduct, the record clearly reflects h er willful misconduct and demonstrated s he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for h er conduct or that s he should not be held accountable for h er actions.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.
Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                20000828 - 20000917
Active:

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20000918
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20041115
Length of Service
         Active:                                     4 Yrs 1 Mths 28 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Inactive:                                            NONE
Time Lost During This Period:
Days UA:
Days Confinement:

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 53
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   HN

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance :                                         2.5 ( 4 )
Behavior :                                            1.5 ( 4 )
OTA :                                                  2.33

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

20030808 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: (2 specs) Absence without leave.
         Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation.
         Award: R estriction and extra duty for 15 days .
         No indication of appeal in the record.

200410 05 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: Absence without leave.
         Award: Forfeiture of 668.00 pay for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), reduction to next inferior pay grade (suspended for 6 months).
         No indication of appeal in the record.

20041013:        Forfeiture of pay and reduction in pay grade awarded at NJP on 20041005 vacated due to continued misconduct.

20041026 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: Absence without leave.
         Article 8 9: Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer.
         Article 134: Indecent language.
         Award: R eduction to E- 1 .
         No indication of appeal in the record.

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified :                                        20041022
Reason for Discharge              -

Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20041024
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel
Obtain Copies of Documents
Submit Statement(s) (date)
Administrative Board
GCMCA Review

Commanding Officer R ecommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):      COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL HEALTH CARE NEW ENGLAND ( 20041116 )
         Reason for discharge directed :             -
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20041115

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:                               3

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                                           Finances:
         Health/Medical Records:                            Substance Abuse:
         Family/Personal Status:                            Education:
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:
         Criminal Records:

Other:
         Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:
        Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 02 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605], SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 89 (Disrespect towards a superior commissioned officer), 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and 1 34 (Indecent language).

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601082

Original file (ND0601082.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020311Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020311Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): 20020313 Discharge directed by (date):COMCRUDESGRU 20020315Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002022

Original file (MD1002022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service record Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that clemency was not warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601144

Original file (ND0601144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20041022Reason for Discharge due to: due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20041022Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601094

Original file (ND0601094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation None. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDUREDate Notified:20040804Reason for Discharge:MISCONDUCT - Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040804Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Discharge Board date: NOT...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700061

Original file (ND0700061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized Absenceand Article 87, Missing Movement.. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200832

Original file (ND1200832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to reenlist.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400454

Original file (MD1400454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Administrative Separation Board determined by majority vote that the preponderance of evidence supported separation by reason of a Pattern of Misconduct and Unsatisfactory Performance, and recommended that the Applicant be separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901870

Original file (ND0901870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB requested but did not receive the Applicant’s in-service medical record, and the Applicant did not provide any documentation to support his case. Seaman [Applicant]’s abuse of his position and authority goes to the very core of the Navy’s sexual harassment policy.” The NDRB determined the Applicant’s PTSD was not a mitigating factor in his misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900950

Original file (ND0900950.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a unanimous vote of 5-0, the Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions,” and the narrative reason for the discharge; “Misconduct,” shall remain as issued considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, theBoard found ADDENDUM: Information for...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200952

Original file (ND1200952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants an upgrade to be eligible for medical benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700022

Similar Decisions