Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701061
Original file (MD0701061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-PVT, USMC
MD07-01061
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070724        Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5      

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Characterization is improper because Applicant did not have over 180 days of service.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 08 0110                  Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1 (Propriety): By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did contain adverse circumstances during h is first 180 days of service prior to notification of separation which occurred on the 175 th day. T he Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps. Therefore the Board found that his un der other than honorable conditions characterization most appropriate and proper .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20050209 - 20040403                   
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20050404      Years Contracted : 4 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20051026
Length of Service : 00 Yrs   06 Mths   23 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 42          MOS: 9971      Highest Rank: PVT
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 1 ) / 4.2 ( 1 )
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, RIFLE SS

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20050208:        A pplicant signed Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
20050914 :         NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received tested positive for PCP.

2 0050919 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 617 ) for ( 2 months); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

 20050920 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for illegal drug involvement (PCP). Administrative separation proceedings are mandatory.
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20090929      
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO
                 
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                       
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050929 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20051017 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, MARINE CORPS INSTALLATIONS WEST ( 20051018 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:            

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 1 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisiona l documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001924

    Original file (MD1001924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, based on an administrative impropriety, the Board determined that the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002104

    Original file (MD1002104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s overall proficiency and conduct (Pro/Con) marks of 4.2 and 3.9, respectively, he was discharged from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon completion of his required active service. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.The NDRB has no authority...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601050

    Original file (MD0601050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-, USMC MD06-01050Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 200060803Characterization of Service: Narrative Reason for Separation: Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: SACo, h&s bn, soi, campen, caApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070614Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service Record: YESComplete Medical...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300935

    Original file (MD1300935.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MDI3-00935 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT APPLICANT’S ISSUES The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. Docket No, MD13-00935 Issue 4: (Decisional) (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED.

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700014

    Original file (MD0700014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found no evidence to suggest the Applicant’s discharge was not proper.Issue 2 (Equity): Regulations state that separations initiated within the entry level period (first 180 days of service) will normally be characterized as “Uncharacterized.” The Board found no evidence in the record or the documentation submitted by the applicant that identifiedexceptional circumstances that may warrant an honorable discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800565

    Original file (MD0800565.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900484

    Original file (MD0900484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.The Applicant provided statements in his DD-293 Application claiming good citizenship with no involvement in illegal activities.While the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901846

    Original file (ND0901846.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201463

    Original file (MD1201463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900213

    Original file (MD0900213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    :() .The Applicant contends he is entitled to a discharge upgrade because he was not properly counseled about the type of discharge he would receive. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate andan upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a...