Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700879
Original file (MD0700879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00879
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070611   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT     Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Discharge was unfair
                           2. Service Record

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date: 20 071220                   Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: ( ). The Applicant contends that his discharge was unfair because his misconduct was related to family matters. The record reflects that the Applicant misconduct was not isolated to family affairs in that he disobeyed a lawful order given by his First Sergeant and damaged a door in government housing. Furthermore, the Applicant violated Article 128 (Assault) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice on two occasions. The UCMJ does not distinguish assault on family members from any other person , military or nonmilitary .

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant contends that his Serve Record deserves a better characterization of discharge than he received. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by the award of one retention warning and two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Articles 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order) , Article 108 (Willfully damage government property) and Article 128 (Assault). Violations of UCMJ Articles 9 2 , 1 08, and 128 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE SERVICE FROM 1992 APR 14 to 1995 DEC 21 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19920408 - 19920413              Active:          19920414 - 19951221
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19951222      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 19981030
Length of Service :    2 Yrs 10 Mths 8 D ys    Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 38          MOS: 0352 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.4 ( 7 ) / 4.4 ( 7 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214) : Rifle , Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal (w/1st ar), United Nations Medal, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon (w/ 1 star), Meritorious Unit Commendation, Meritorious Mast, Letter of Appreciation

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19980211 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey a lawful order (2 specs), Art. 108 – Willfully damage military property, Art.128 – Assault on his wife .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 689.00 ) for (2 months) 1 months suspended for 6 months ; RIR ( E-3 ); Restr for (30 days) suspended for 6 months .

19980330:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for Violations adjudicated in NJP 19980211 .

19980615:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 128 – Assault on his child .
         Awarded - RIR (E-2) susp for 6 months


Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   19980629
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19980629
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Administrative Board Date :       19980909
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY DUE TO .
                  BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
 Recommendation on Separation:   BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 1998 1002 )
SJA review (date):       ( 19981001 )
Separation Authority (date):     MCB Camp Pendleton ( 19981002 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19981030

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 Aug 01.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 , 108 and 128.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100088

    Original file (MD1100088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Clemency denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the punitive discharge separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501071

    Original file (ND0501071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01071 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050614. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Appointment of Veterans Service Organization as Claimant’s Representative, dtd June 7,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500790

    Original file (MD0500790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00790 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050330. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“Members of the Board, I request that my discharge of (under other than Honorable) be upgraded to RE-3. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700365

    Original file (ND0700365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - FOP ($692.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-3); Restr for (30 days); Extra duties (30 days).20021107: Retention Warning for unauthorized absence, wrongfully consume alcoholic beverages as a minor, dereliction of duty, failure to obey a lawful order.20031207: NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD. Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800821

    Original file (MD0800821.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : (Equity) either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Based on this evidence, an upgrade or change in the characterization of service by the Board is unwarranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500970

    Original file (ND0500970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests his characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. Each violation of Article 108 and 128 is defined as the commission of a serious offense, hence the misconduct by commission of a serious offense for which he was separated. The Applicant did not submit documentation for the board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700054

    Original file (ND0700054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in his administrative separation and the characterization of his service. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19941117Reason for Discharge - - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLEDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 19941117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit Statement(s)...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00886

    Original file (MD03-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. I am submitting from DD 293 to the review board and I am asking that my “Other than Honorable Conditions” discharge be upgraded to Honorable.

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500132

    Original file (MD1500132.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COURT-MARTIAL. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800848

    Original file (ND0800848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. The Board determined an upgrade was not warranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by...