Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700718

Original file (MD0700718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
MD07-00718

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070502 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Post Service.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 07120 5             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue 1 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no d ocumentation of post-service accomplishments other than his statement. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, evidence of a drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the Applicant ’s un document ed claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is c onduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by a finding of guilty at one Summary Court-Martial for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a . A v iolation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20011114 - 20011209
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20011210     Years Contracted : 4 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20040719
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 07 Mths 10 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d : 20
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 57          MOS: 2141 Highest Rank: LCPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.4 ( 7 ) / 4.0 ( 7 )
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , GWOTEM, NDSM, SSDR, PUC

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20011011:        Applicant signs Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

20011114:        Applicant receives pre-service drug waiver.

20031214:        Applicant apprehended at the U.S. border with steroids.

20031217 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failure to obey order /regulation. Discharge warning issued.

20040105 :         UCLA Olympic Analytical Laboratory , Los Angeles , CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20031224 tested positive for anabolic androgenic steroid.

20040115 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violation of UCMJ Article 112a. Being processed for administrative separation.

20040504 :        SCM -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92, 2 specifications, 112a.
         Awarded - FOP ( $280) for ( 1 month ) ; RIR ( E-1 ); Confinement ( 25 days).

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20040525
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20040526
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20040525 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20040701 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON ( 20040709 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20040719

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800738

Original file (ND0800738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the characterization of service received, “ Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing andis directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs concerning Additional Reviews and Automatic Upgrades .Should the Applicant feel...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000257

Original file (MD1000257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800817

Original file (MD0800817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a personal statement and as evidence of post-service accomplishments. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700884

Original file (MD0700884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Medical/Service...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101014

Original file (ND1101014.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20001212 - 20010819Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20010820Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040803Highest Rank/Rate:ABHANLength of Service: Years Months14 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 33EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(4)Behavior:3.3(4)OTA: 3.29Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NDSM SSDR...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101115

Original file (ND1101115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board conducted an exhaustive review of the records and found no evidence to support, nor did the Applicant provide any evidence to indicate,that he attempted to use, other than the chaplain, the numerous services available for service members who undergo personal problems during their enlistments, such as Medical or Mental Health professionals, Navy Relief Society, Family Advocacy Programs, or even the Red Cross.In fact, the NDRB found that the Navy offered the Applicant intensive...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901227

Original file (ND0901227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, even if the Applicant could have produced additional evidence to support a review based on his post-service conduct, the Applicant should be aware that post-service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600999

Original file (MD0600999.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDUREDate Notified:20011023Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCTdue to Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20011023Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Board Date: not applicable Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): UNDER...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601153

Original file (MD0601153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: PROPER Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLE By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board: 1. Post service.Issue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900981

Original file (ND0900981.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ADAA, USN Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20090311 Characterization of Service Received: Narrative Reason for Discharge: Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20040506 - 20040524 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20040525 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700718

Similar Decisions