ex-ADAA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090311
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN
Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
Narrative Reason change to:
Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20040506 - 20040524 Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20040525 Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20061010 Highest Rank/Rate: ADAN
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 16 Day(s)
Education Level: AFQT: 45
Evaluation Marks: Performance: 3.3 (3) Behavior: 2.6 (3) OTA:
3.22
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):
Periods of UA/CONF:
NJP:
- 20060921: Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance,
cocaine)
Awarded: Suspended:
SCM:
SPCM:
CC:
Retention Warning Counseling:
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
DD 214: Service/Medical Record:
Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
Employment: Finances:
Education/Training:
Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse:
Criminal Records:
Family/Personal Status: Community Service:
References:
Additional Statements:
From Applicant: From Representation:
From Congress member:
Other Documentation:
Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11,
effective 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-146, Separation by
Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211,
Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503,
Equity.
C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive
discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special
or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (Drug
use).
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
Applicant’s Issues
1. Applicant wants his RE (reenlistment) code change from an RE-4 to an RE-
2.
2. Applicant requests post-service conduct consideration.
Decision
Date: 20090827 Location: Washington D.C. Representation:
By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of
an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service
and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing
discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of government
affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the
presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The
Applicant’s record of service reflects for of the Uniform Code of
Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a (wrongful use of controlled
substance, cocaine), the drug level in the Applicant’s system for cocaine
was 246ng/ml, well above the positive reading threshold of 100ng/ml
established by the Naval Drug Lab. The Applicant also had a pre-service
drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Navy. Based on the
offense(s) committed by the Applicant, command was required to
administratively process for separation. When processed for
administrative separation, the Applicant waived rights to consult with
qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an
Administrative Board.
: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants his RE Code change from RE-4 to RE-
2. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or
reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed
Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to
reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a
discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An
unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request
for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application
for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Issue 2: (Decisional) (Post-service Conduct) . The Applicant claims he
has become a positive influence in his community. The Applicant was
advised through official correspondence from the NDRB to provide material
documenting post-service conduct, but he opted not to do so. Without
documentary evidence the Board cannot form a basis of relief.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the
Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the
Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall
and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a
period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is
directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional
Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct.]
ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures: If you believe the decision in your case is unclear,
not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with
the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may
submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to
the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the
Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure
does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed
solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements
for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and
other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.”
Additional Reviews: After a document review has been conducted, former
members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the
application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of
discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims
of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this
discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended
but not required. There are veteran's organizations, such as the American
Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans, willing to provide
guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge
upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years,
has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise
exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC
20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines
eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review
Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization
solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not
serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities: The NDRB has no authority to upgrade
a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational
opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of
the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over
reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any
other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a
reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no
authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing
reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a
bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the
processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct: DoD disability regulations do not
preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that
separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for
other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical
Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative
involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct,
the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case
remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.
If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for
misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is
authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated
health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to
change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical
disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction
of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an
unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time
or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.
Post-Service Conduct: The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service
factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service
conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough
understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period
of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation
to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to:
a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth
certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of
community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil
authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing
from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions;
attendance or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and
documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that
completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an
unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-
by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate
previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the
member’s overall character.
Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD): Because relevant and
material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the
NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence
of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.
With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action
of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an
act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The
NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or
dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.
Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are
recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the
service records by writing to:
Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001601
:(Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code in order to reenlist into the Armed Forces.Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits, and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902549
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201037
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500034
Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found However, after...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301901
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant requests a change to his reentry (RE) code to reenlist in the Navy.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900452
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board reviewed the evidence of record, which included the Applicant’s statement, medical records from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, statement of the Applicant’s mother, and other service medical records and concluded there was not a connection between the Applicant’s misconduct and his medical condition. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901989
Based on the post service documentation provided, an upgrade would be inappropriate.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400781
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant is no longer eligible for additional reviews or hearings by the NDRB. ”...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300158
Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400790
On 14 December 2009, an Administrative Separation Board determined that a preponderance of the evidence supported drug abuseand recommended the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, but that the separation be suspended. Full relief to Honorable and a narrative change to Administrative was not granted because of the serious nature of the misconduct and because he was properly discharged for Misconduct (Drug Abuse).Summary: After a thorough review...