Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700424

Original file (MD0700424.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
MD07-00424

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070216 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN para 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Better employment opportunities.
                           2. Inequitable and long lasting punishment.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 071018                                     Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1: The Board determined that this i ssue is n ot an i ssue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum .

Issue 2 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is c onduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by one Summary Court Martial for a violation of UCMJ Article (s) 81 and 112a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. A violation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20000628 – 20010626
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20010 627      Years Contracted : 5 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20040707
Length of Service : 2 Yrs 11 Mths 17 D ys Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d : 24
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 19     AFQT: 36          MOS: 6257 Highest Rank: CPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 / 4.4
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, EXPERT RIFLE BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20000624:        Applicant signed Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

20030815 :         NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20030812 , tested positive for METHAMPHETAMINE .

20030816 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for admitted rug use. Being processed for judicial action and administrative separation.

20031121 :        SCM -- Viol UCMJ Art. 81 and 112a – Plead GUILTY .
         Awarded - FOP ( 2/3 pay ) for ( 1 month); RIR ( E-1 ); Confinement ( 30 days).

20031204 :        Medical Record: SACC consultation report. Applicant does not meet criteria for substance abuse or substance dependency.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20040210
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20040211
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                       ELECTED
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20040211 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20040524 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, THIRD MARINE AIRCRAFT WING ( 20040625 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:        20040707

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F ) , effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700428

Original file (MD0700428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discussion Issue(s) 1-2: The Board determined that these issues are not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700480

Original file (MD0700480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date:20071101Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Texas Veterans Commission Discussion Issue 1: The Board determined that this issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20031121 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700038

Original file (MD0700038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. (2005001219) SJA review (date): (20060309)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST MARINE DIVISION (REIN) (20060313) Basis for discharge directed: due to: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20060317 Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardTotal Number of Pages: 5 Related to Period of Service Under Review: From Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Other Period(s) of Service: From Service and/or...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900788

Original file (MD0900788.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, and Discharge Process, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700042

Original file (MD0700042.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: PROPER Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLEIssue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601215

Original file (MD0601215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

(20020314) SJA review (date): (20020321)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON (20020322) Basis for discharge directed: ()Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20020325 Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardTotal Number of Pages: 7 Related to Period of Service Under Review: From Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Other Period(s) of Service: From Service and/or Medical Record: Other...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700040

Original file (MD0700040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. (199700220) SJA review (date): (19970425)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, U.S. MARINE CORPS FORCES, ATLANTIC (19970509) Basis for discharge directed: due to: Characterization directed: Date...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900175

Original file (MD0900175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of Article 112a is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service, grade or prior record of service. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700321

Original file (MD0700321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20040930 - 20050221 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment:...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901819

Original file (MD0901819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s misconduct clearly warranted the discharge as issued. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700424

Similar Decisions