Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601215
Original file (MD0601215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD06-01215
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

 Application Received:                               20 60908
         Characterization of Service:             
         Basis for Discharge :                      
         Discharge Authority :                       MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    sctybn mcb campen ca

Applicant’s Request:
          Characterization change to:              
         Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
         Representation:                                    
         Issues (as summarized by NDRB):          
1. Reenlistment opportunity.
2. Educational benefits.
3. Post service.                  

Decision:

 By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS .       
By a vote of 5-0 the Basis for Discharge shall remain MISCONDUCT.

 Date of Decision:                                            200708 30         
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                                    YES
 Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      PROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

Issue s 1 -2 : The Board determined that th ese I ssue s are not i ssue s which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding th ese issue s .

Issue 3 (Equity): The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in deciding whether to re-characterize a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation providing that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct, or favorable endorsements in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Ordinarily, the NDRB must find that a procedural impropriety or inequity existed during the period of enlistment in question before it can grant relief. Outstanding post-service conduct is considered by the NDRB to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided t wo character reference letters as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing to be compelling. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, evidence of drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of the discharge.

W hen a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as under honorable conditions. However, when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record , an under other than honorable conditions characterization is warranted. The Applicant’s conduct during his period of Marine Corps service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was marred by one discharge warning, one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 , Failure to obey order, regulation, and one conviction at a Summary Court-Martial for violation of Art 1 12a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. A violation of either Article 92 o r Article 1 12a is considered a serious offense, for which a punitive (Bad Conduct or Dishonorable) discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Court-Martial. A n upgrade to Honorable would be inappropriate.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                               20000706 - 20000813

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment:                                 20000814
Years Contracted :                                  
Date of Discharge:                                  20020325
Length of Service
          Active:                                      1 Yrs 7 Mths 12 D ys (does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive:                                            0 Yrs 0 Mths 0 D ys
          Time Lost During This Period:             Days UA: Days Confinement: 8

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 44
MOS:                                                  3381
Highest Rank:                                       
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               4.3 ( 6 ) / 4.2 ( 6 )

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): RIFLE SHARPSHOOTER BADGE


Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20000705:        Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
20010227 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 92: On or about 2001022, present in PFC L_’s POV which is in direct violation of the DetO P3000.1K.
         Award: Forfeiture of $521.00 for 1 month, correction for 30 days, reduction to E-1 Appealed: 020302. Appeal of forfeiture and reduction was disapproved.
20010227 :        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Viol ation of Art icle 92. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 20020313:        Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.
         Specification: On or about 20020122 to 20020203, wrongfully use marijuana.
         Finding: To Charge and the specification, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $737.00, confinement for 10 days, reduction to E-1.
         CA action 20020325: Sentence approved and ordered executed.



Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified:                                       20020313
Basis for Discharge:                                DUE TO
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20020317
Rights Elected at Notification:
          Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents                
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       WAIVED

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20020314 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20020321 )
 Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP PENDLETON ( 20020322 )
          Basis for discharge directed:             ( )
         Characterization directed:                        
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20020325


Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Total Number of Pages:                               7

Related to Period of Service Under Review:
          From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:  

Related to Other Period(s) of Service:
          From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
          Employment:                                          Finances:       
         Health/Medical Records:                             Substance Abuse:        
         Family/Personal Status:                             Education:      
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:     
         Criminal Records:                         

Other:
          Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representative:    
        Other Documentation (Describe)            Picture of applicant and two other Marines
                                                       Applicant’s biography


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16F ) , effective 01 September 2001 until Present,
Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 and 112a.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700769

    Original file (MD0700769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation) andone Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701203

    Original file (ND0701203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700714

    Original file (MD0700714.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date: 20071205Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20031201 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20040104) SJA...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801221

    Original file (ND0801221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700146

    Original file (MD0700146.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that Discussion Issue(s) 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Regulations limit the Board’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700262

    Original file (MD0700262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by one nonjudicial punishment for violating the UCMJ Article 81 and 92 and one felony conviction for DUI with injury. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700121

    Original file (MD0700121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20070830Location:Washington D.C.The Board found that Discussion Issue(s) 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19961023 - 19970824 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19970825Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20001103Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900788

    Original file (MD0900788.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, and Discharge Process, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 1 September 2001 until Present. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801213

    Original file (ND0801213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service received, "Other Than Honorable", was an appropriate characterization considering the time served and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002022

    Original file (MD1002022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service record Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that clemency was not warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...