Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700293
Original file (MD0700293.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00293
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070105   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: AS A RESULT OF A COURT-MARTIAL (SPCM) OTHER             Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 1105

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Reenlistment opportunities
                           2. Clemency
                           3. Post Service

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall AS A RESULT OF A COURT-MARTIAL (SPCM) Other

Date: 20 071004                                       Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

 Issue 1 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: (Equity) . In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The NDRB found the evidence of record did not contain sufficient mitigating or extenuating factors to offset the seriousness of the offense for which the discharge was awarded. In addition, the reason for discharge, convicted by special court-martial, is most appropriate. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed.

Issue 3: (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no documents as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, educational pursuits, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ 19890616-19890622; (1404) 19890831-19930705 . ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19870813 - 19871115              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19871116      Years Contracted : ; Extension:                   Date of Discharge: 19950109
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 03 Mths 12 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: 1404 Days Confine d : 38
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 33          MOS: 3381 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.4 ( 6 ) / 3.7 ( 6 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19890118:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for notable decreased performance of duties in the following areas: Personal grooming standards, living quarters upkeep, and reporting for duty under the influence of alcohol.
19890127:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 108 – Destruction of Government Property on 19890121; viol UCMJ Art. 121 – Theft of Government Property on 19890121; viol UCMJ Art. 134 – Unlawfully enter the 9thMar Dining Facility.
         Awarded - FOP ($189.00) for (1 month); Restr for (14 days) suspended for 6 months; Extra duties (14 days) suspended for 6 months.
19890216:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 134 – Utter to worthless check on or about 19881219-19881222.
         Awarded - FOP ($189.00) for (1 month) suspended for 6 months; Restr for (14 days); Extra duties (14 days).
19890419:        NJP imposed and suspended on 19890216 for a period of 6 months vacated.
19890419:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 108 – Destruction of Government Property on 19890413; viol UCMJ Art. 134 – Utter 10 worthless checks on or about 19881217-19890207.
         Awarded - FOP ($391.00) for (2 months) suspended for 6 months; RIR (E-2); and correctional custody for 14 days.

 19890419 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for alcohol related incidents, frequent NJPs, and issuance of worthless checks .

19890712:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Disobedience to a written order on or about 0015, 19890602; viol UCMJ Art. 107 – Falsifying official statement.
         Awarded - FOP ($349.00) for (2 months) suspended for 3 months; RIR (E-1); Restr for (60 days).
19890714:        NJP imposed and suspended on 19890712 for a period of 3 months vacated.

19890831:        Applicant UA

19930605:        Applicant apprehended by San Bernardino S.D.

        

Discharge Process

 Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 86 , UA from 19890831 to 19930705 .
Preferred: 19930806       Court-martial: 19930812   Findings: Guilty of Article(s) 86
Sentence: BCD; Conf 38 days .             CA action: 19940102
NC&PB Action: 19941214 Clemency: Parole: Restoration:
Appellate Review Complete: 19941228       BCD ordered executed: 19950109 SSPCMCO No. 95-62
Applicant Discharged: 19950109

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTS-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV , Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700304

    Original file (MD0700304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19881021 - 19890625Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19890626Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19920609 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11Mths14 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700969

    Original file (MD0700969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700545

    Original file (MD0700545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and the standards of discipline, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted. 20-95 Applicant Discharged: 19970710 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700711

    Original file (MD0700711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19890509–19890521 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19890522Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 19920601Length of Service: 03Yrs 00 Mths 03 DysLost Time:Days UA: 7 Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700453

    Original file (MD0700453.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense that he committed. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700318

    Original file (ND0700318.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, the award of six nonjudicial punishment (NJP), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence), Article 87 (Missing Movement), and Article 92 (Disobeying a lawful order). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700265

    Original file (MD0700265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    19930423: NJP imposed and suspended on 19930409 for a period of 6 months vacated.19930803: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 19930824 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930823) SJA review (date): (19930830) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST Marine Division (19930910) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700516

    Original file (MD0700516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Absent any documentation provided by the Applicant for the Board to consider, the Board determined that the Applicant’s service record did notmitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.An upgrade would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700570

    Original file (MD0700570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:None submitted. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19930312 - 19940123Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940124Years Contracted:; Extension:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700731

    Original file (ND0700731.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary of...