Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700570
Original file (MD0700570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00570
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070321   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT                                         Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       None submitted.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 071120             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, but significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of his military record, it is appropriate to characterize that service as general (under honorable conditions). An under other than honorable conditions discharge is appropriate when a member’s conduct involves one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. The Applicant’s service was marred by 2 retention warnings and 5 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86, 91 and 92 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct reflects his willful failure to meet expected standards of conduct and falls far short of that warranting an upgrade in his characterization of service .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:   
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19930312 - 19940123              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19940124               Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 19970228
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 01 Mths 05 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: 30 Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 42          MOS: 2531 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.7 ( 8 ) / 3.4 ( 8 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, SASM (W/1 STAR), SSDR

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19941219 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Unauthorized absence from 0430, 19941214 to 0700, 19941219 .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 217.00 ) for ( 1 month); Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days).
19950801:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for losing significant amount of 782 gear and uttering bad checks.
19951031:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Absent from appointed place of duty 0530-0645, 19951018.
         Awarded - FOP ($232.00) for (1 month) , susp 6 months; Restr for (14 days); Extra duties (14 days).
19960129 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Absent from appointed place of duty 1345-1545, 19960123 ; Art. 91 – Disobeyed SNCO order (put emblem on camouflage blouse) .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 232.00 ) for ( 1 month); Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days).
19960402:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for lack of direction, inability to adapt to military life, frequent involvement with military authorities, repeated and reoccurring irresponsible behavior concerning financial affairs, uttering bad checks, borrowing money and subsequent failure to repay debts.

 19960606:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey an order (prepare for wall locker/JOB inspection) .
          Awarded - FOP ($250.00) for (1 month) suspended for 6 months ; Restr for (14 days).

19960919:        Forfeiture of pay awarded and suspended at NJP on 19960906 vacated due to continued misconduct.
19961029 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – (3 Specs) : Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty, Art. 91 – Willfully disobeyed SNCO order .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 490.00 ) for ( 1 month); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days).
19970130:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700.

19970224:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0732 (25 days/surrendered).
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   19970108
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19970108
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19970108 )
SJA review (date):       ( 19970127 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST MARINE DIVISION ( 19970127 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       1997022 8

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:    Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 Aug 01.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700795

    Original file (MD0700795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19930528 - 19930811Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19930812Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19961107Length of Service: 03 Yrs 02Mths26 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 88MOS:2515Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700657

    Original file (MD0700657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19960221 - 19960225Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960226Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19970213Length of Service: 00 Yrs 11Mths18 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701233

    Original file (MD0701233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20020307 - 20021014Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20021015Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050414Length of Service: Yrs Mths29 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700447

    Original file (ND0700447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative errors on the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700318

    Original file (ND0700318.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, the award of six nonjudicial punishment (NJP), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence), Article 87 (Missing Movement), and Article 92 (Disobeying a lawful order). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701056

    Original file (MD0701056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ” “ MISCONDUCT”The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700261

    Original file (MD0700261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 19930428Basis for Discharge: DUE TO Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19930428Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930428) SJA review (date): (19930518) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE DIVISION(19930519) Basis for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700367

    Original file (ND0700367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by 2 retention warnings, 6 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (unauthorized absence), 90 (willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer), 91 (insubordinate conduct towards a master chief petty officer), 92 (failure to obey written regulation), 95 (resistance), 112 (drunk on duty), 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) and 134 (unlawful entry) of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701093

    Original file (MD0701093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. 20050318: Vacate FOP for 1 month, Restr and Extra duties for 45 days awarded at NJP dated 20050116.20050331: MARCORSEPMAN 6105...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700264

    Original file (MD0700264.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, post service, and the standards of discipline, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted. 99-483 Applicant Discharged: 19990413 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal...