Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700268
Original file (MD0700268.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-CAPT, USMC
MD07-00268
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061220   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT            Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 4104

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Record of service.
                           2. One isolated incident.
                           3. Post service.

Decision

 By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) .        
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT.

Date: 2007 1002 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Issue s 1 and 2 (Equity). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant violated the UCMJ. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is conduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions.

When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general (under honorable conditions ) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by the award of one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 , Failure to obey order, regulation and one punitive letter of reprimand. A v iolation of UCMJ Article 92 is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                      
Active:          19950630 - 19990525 USNA HON
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Commission : 19990526      Years Contracted : INDEF            Date of Discharge: 20060113
Length of Service : 06 Yrs 07 Mths 18 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 16       Age at Commission : 22    AFQT: N/A         MOS: 5803 Highest Rank: CAPT
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      N/A       Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Navy and Marine C orps Achievement Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Pr e sidential Unit C itation-Navy, Navy Meritorious Unit Commendation (2d awd), Rifle Sharpshooter B adge, Pistol Expert Badge (4th awd).

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20050812:        Applicant submitted a qualified request for resignation for cause . He stated that his resignation was based on his misconduct for dereliction of duty as outlined in Charge III of the charges referred against him by the CG, II Marine Expeditionary Force. He admitted that he was derelict in the performance of his duty. The Applicant requested an Honorable discharge. The Applicant stated that he understood his request could result in discharge from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization.

20050901:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 (Dereliction).
         Awarded – Written Reprimand.
20050901:        Applicant given a Punitive Letter of Reprimand by CG, II Marine Expeditionary Force.

 20050916         CG, II Marine Expeditionary Force recommends approval of Applicant’s resignation request and that he discharged with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions).
20050926:        CG, II Marine Expeditionary Force submits a report of Applicant’s Non-judicial Punishment. A Board of Inquiry was not recommended because Applicant submitted a request for resignation for cause which had been favorably endorsed.

200 5 1011 :         C ommander, U. S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic recommends approval of Applicant’s resignation request and that he discharged with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions) .
20011011:        C ommander, U. S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic concurred in the recommendation that Applicant not be required to show cause pursuant to his written request for resignation.
20051201         Commandant concurred with the recommendation to approve the Applicant’s resignation request and further recommended that he be separated by reason of Unacceptable Conduct with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions).

20061206:        Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved Applicant’s qualified resignation request . Directed General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge by reason of Resignation – Unacceptable Conduct.


Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6C (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS), effective 15 December 2005 until Present establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 14 March 1997.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700901

    Original file (MD0700901.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 20001110: Applicant signs Marine Corps policy concerning fraternization. Awarded –Written Reprimand.20060926: Applicant issued Punitive Letter of Reprimand.20060929: Applicant submitted a request for 20061017: ,3d Marine Aircraft Wingforwarded Report of Non-judicial Punishment to the Commandant of the Marine Corps.20061017: Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wingforwarded Applicant’s request for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700608

    Original file (MD0700608.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was marred by the award of two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 (Failure to obey order, regulation), and Article 111 (Drunken or reckless driving). Officer administrative separationDischarge Process Applicant provided written notice of administrative separation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701104

    Original file (MD0701104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was processed and received a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service and therefore Administrative Board was not required. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20011010 - 20011210Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901892

    Original file (MD0901892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” There is no requirement to notify the service member of a recommended Narrative Reason for Separation, only the recommended Character of Service. The NDRB conducted a complete review of officer separation codes and narratives and determined that BNC1, Resignation (Unacceptable Conduct), were the most appropriate DD-214 entries.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501120

    Original file (MD0501120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. This letter and supporting documentation is my personal request for a review of my discharge issued by the United States Marine Corps, though the Secretary of the Navy, on 15 October 2003. While there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801775

    Original file (MD0801775.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process 20061101:Applicant apprehended by US Customs for transporting illegal fur from Afghanistan.Applicant submitted resignation request.Commandant of the Marine Corps denied resignation request.Applicant pleaded guilty to importing endangered species into the United States.Sentence: $5,000; one year unsupervised probation; forfeiture of item.20070717:Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command, directed Applicant to show cause forretention at a Board of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001866

    Original file (MD1001866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Jul 2009, the Applicant submitted a request to the Secretary of the Navy, via Commandant of the Marine Corps, for resignation of his commission warrant in the Marine Corps in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can review and make determinations on these issues.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, request for resignation, and the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800794

    Original file (MD0800794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Paragraph 4103, CAUSE of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present.B. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901503

    Original file (MD0901503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The fact that the command referred charges to a General Court-Martial, the NDRB determined that the charges against the Applicant substantiated his unacceptable conduct as an officer. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00895

    Original file (MD04-00895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Recommended administrative separation. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violating orders, assault upon a fellow officer, and conduct unbecoming an officer.