Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700099
Original file (MD0700099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00099
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061023   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Employment opportunities
                           2. Unfair character of service based on service record

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 070823 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue 1: : The Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding employment issues.

Issue 2 (Equity): The Applicant claims that his discharge characterization was unfair due to his 5+ year clean service record prior to the misconduct that formed the basis for discharge. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. It is mandatory in the Marine Corps that any Marine who uses illegal drugs be processed for administrative separation. Separation under those circumstances normally results in characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when the reason for separation is behavior , such as drug abuse, that constitutes a significant departure from conduct expected of a Marine , or when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s record of service during the current (i.e., most recent) enlistment, which forms the basis of the discharge characterization, was marred by a nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violation of Article 112a (Wrongful use, etc of a controlled substance), as well as an adverse counseling entry in the service record book for involvement with civilian authorities. There is no evidence in the record that suggests the Applicant was not responsible for his misconduct, or that he should not have been held accountable. Violation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense, for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Court - Martial. Therefore, an upgrade of characterization to General (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate in this case .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19990825 - 19990831     Active:          19990901 - 20021007
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20021008      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050914
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 11 Mths 07 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 50          MOS: 0411 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.4 ( 2 ) / 3.0 ( 2 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): MARINE CORPS GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2 ND AWARD), NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, MARKSMAN RIFLE BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19990824:        Applicant signed Statement of Understanding Marine Corps Policy on Illegal Use of Drugs

 20050616 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20050608, tested positive for THC.

 20050622 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully use marijuana . Awarded - FOP ( $820.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-3 ); Restr for ( 45 days) .
20050623 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for processing for administrative separation for substance abuse and your recent Battalion level NJP.

20050725 :        Applicant to appear at Prince William General District Traffic for the following charges: DWI, drugs, possess marijuana, 1 st offense, concealed weapon, carry. No further information found in service record.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20050706
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20050718
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( NOT FOUND, BUT REFERENCE IN SJA’S LETTER)
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050725 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20050819 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, TRAINING COMMAND, QUANTICO, VA ( 20050909 )
 Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050914

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 Sep tember 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601091

    Original file (ND0601091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Narrative reason change: Commander Naval Personnel directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse after reviewing the administrative discharge package forwarded by U. S. Naval Security Force, Bahrain. The record documents his administrative discharge board and commanding officer’s recommendation for separation by reason of misconduct by drug abuse with a characterization of service as under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700285

    Original file (ND0700285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.Issue 3 (): The Applicant claims he was never provided the opportunity for drug treatment prior to separating from service. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20040704 - 20041026Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20041027Years Contracted:NOT FOUND IN RECORD; Extension: Date...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100323

    Original file (MD1100323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20030317 - 20030922Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030923Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060315Highest Rank: Length of Service: Years Months23 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:34MOS: 0621Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700192

    Original file (MD0700192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant claims his medical issues contributed to his misconduct and adverse discharge. (2) Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20051109 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 and 112a BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501182

    Original file (MD1501182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701061

    Original file (MD0701061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20080110Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1 (Propriety): By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801027

    Original file (MD0801027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) Proficiency/Conduct Data listing printed 11/09/2005.Thank you letter from D_ B_...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902161

    Original file (MD0902161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902473

    Original file (ND0902473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants to reenlist. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001152

    Original file (MD1001152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined that the discharge action was proper; as such, relief based on propriety is not warranted.Despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval Service in order to maintain good order and discipline. The Applicant was re-processed for administrative separation; on 24 February2009,the discharge action was approved - Misconduct (Drug Abuse) - and the Applicant was awarded an Under Other Than...