Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601143

Original file (ND0601143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN
ND06-01143

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060829
Characterization of Service:
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT/COMMISSION OF SERIOUS MILITARY OFFENSE
Discharge Authority :                                MILPERSMAN 3630600
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       PATROL SQUADRON SIXTEEN

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
Representation:

Decision:

Date of Decision:                                            20 070727
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:
Complete Medical Record:
Complete Discharge Package:

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Applicant’s Issues as Summarized by the Board:

1 . Re-entry into military service.
2 . Financial problems contributed to misconduct.
3 . Post – Service Equity

Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
Inactive: NONE
Active: NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19950425
Years Contracted :                                   ;
Date of Discharge:                                  19971205
Length of Service
Active:                                              02 Yrs 02 Mos 24 Days ^{Does not exclude lost time, if any.}
Inactive:                                            00 YRS 05 MOS 07 DAYS

Time Lost During This Period:
Days Unauthorized Absence:                         NONE
Days Confinement:                                   NONE

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 37
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   AA

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance :                                         N/A
Behavior :                                            N/A
OTA :                                                   N/A
Extracted from:
Applicant’s Supporting Documents Other:

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

971205: Applicant discharged with a General (Misconduct/ Commission of Serious Offense) [Extracted from DD Form 214]

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

NONE

Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge
Least Favorable Characterization:
Record Supports Narrative Reason :
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel
Administrative Board
Obtain Copies
Submit Statement(s) (date)
GCMCA Review

Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):
Separation Authority (date):      NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Narrative reason directed :
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:                         19971205

Additional Information Considered by Board

Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board

        Document Type                                        #Pages
Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                            1
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           1
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                     0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0

Total Number of Pages:                            2

Applicant’s Issues as Summarized by the Board:

1 . Re-entry into military service.
2 . Financial problems contributed to misconduct.
3 . Post – Service Equity

Issue(s) 1 : T he Board determined that which can form the basis of relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Decisional Issues:

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant contends that her problems in the Navy can be attributed to her “Financial problems”. While she may feel that her financial problem was the underlying cause of her misconduct, the record clearly reflects her willful misconduct and demonstrated she was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for her conduct or that she should not be held accountable for her actions. Relief denied.

Issue 3 ( ). Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non- involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient post service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 96 1003 until 971212, Article 3630605, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601110

Original file (ND0601110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the applicant is claiming youth and immaturity as contributing factors for his misconduct, the evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601023

Original file (MD0601023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCPL, USMCMD06-01023Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060725Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCT Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PARA 6210.2Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: MALS-12 IWAKUNI JAPANApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: NONE Decision: Date of Decision:20070608 The Discharge shall : GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601173

Original file (ND0601173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board SEPARATION CODE INDICATES BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601139

Original file (ND0601139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19971119Reason for Discharge due to:Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19971119Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, USS CARL VINSON (CVN 70) (19971207)Narrative reason directed:Characterization...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601177

Original file (ND0601177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000525Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000525Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER, CORRY STATION, PENSACOLA (20000613)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601121

Original file (ND0601121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The servicemember has demonstrated a serious lack of core values in this incident.She has no potential for further useful service.” Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19991210Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19991210Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLE/LOCAL...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600897

Original file (MD0600897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Appeal denied 19950309.19950327: Forfeiture of pay awarded at NJP on 19950222 vacated.19950327: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 92: On or about 1300, 19950311 disobey a lawful order or regulation (driving on a base revocation).Article 134: On or about 19940206, 19941207, 19941210 and 19941220 write 4 checks totaling the amount of $164.71 without maintaining sufficient funds in the Navy Federal Credit Union.Award: Forfeiture of $427.00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601017

Original file (ND0601017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation Record not available. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE Date Notified:19990811Reason for Processing:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19990811Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601051

Original file (ND0601051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030117Reason for Discharge erroneous entryLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER 20030123Narrative reason directed:ERRONEOUS ENTRYCharacterization directed: UNCHARACTERIZED Date Applicant Discharged: 20030128 Additional...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700034

Original file (ND0700034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN SERVICE REORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Administrative Board Date : NOT FOUND IN RECORD Findings, by...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601143

Similar Decisions