Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601121
Original file (ND0601121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
ND06-01121
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

 Application Received:                               20 060823
Characterization of Service:                      
Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
Discharge Authority :                                MILPERSMAN 3630600
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       RTC GLAKES IL

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change to:              
         Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
Representation:                                             
Issues (as summarized by NDRB):                    1. RE Code/Reenlistment
                                                       2. Immaturity
                                                                                                           

Decision:

 Date of Decision:                                            20 070727
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package :                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        

By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .


Summary of Service:

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                19990917-19991004
Active:                                              NONE                                               
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19991005
Years Contracted :                                  
Date of Discharge:                                  19991217
Length of Service:                                  00 Yrs 02 Mos 13 Days
Time Lost During This Period:                     
Days Unauthorized Absence:                         NONE
Days Confinement:                                   NONE

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 71
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   AR

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 Performance :                                         NOT APPLICABLE
Behavior :                                            NOT APPLICABLE
OTA :                                                   NOT APPLICABL E

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NONE



Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

 1999120 8 :        NJP for violation of UCMJ:
          Article 92 : On or about 19991124, fail to obey a lawful order by wrongfully having inappropriate physical contact of a sexual nature with SR J_ T. R_, by holding hands and by allowing him to fondle her genitals.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 207 .00 , restriction and extra duty for 14 days .
         No indic ation of appeal in the record.

19991210 :        Applicant notified of her intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

19991210 :        Applicant advised of rights and hav ing elected not to consult with counsel , elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
19991214 :        Commanding Officer, Recruit Training Command, directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense with service characterization of uncharacterized (entry level separation) . Commanding Officer’s comments: “ The specific circumstances surrounding the misconduct warrants separation in this case, however, does not warrant an other than honorable characterization. The servicemember has demonstrated a serious lack of core values in this incident . She has no potential for further useful service. ”


Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified :                                        19991210
Reason for Discharge                                due to:
                                   
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 19991210
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s) (date)                               
GCMCA Review                               
                                                     
Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     NOT APPLICABLE/LOCAL SEPARATION
Separation Authority (date):      COMMANDING OFFICER, RTC ( 19991214 )
Narrative reason directed :                                  
Characterization directed:      
Date Applicant Discharged:                         19991217


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                              1      
         Other Period of Service:                                    0      
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0      
         Education :                                           0      
         Employment :                                          0      
         Health /Medical :                                       0      
         Character Statements:                               0      
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0      
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0      
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0      

Total Number of Pages:                              1      

Discussion

Issue 1 (RE code/reenlistment) : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Decisional Issues:

Issue 2 (equity) (immaturity): The Applicant contends that her d ischarge was inequitable based on immaturity. The Board reviews the propriety and equity of each Applicant’s discharge individually. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the n aval service. Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. The Applicant’s service was marred by a nonjudicial punis hment proceeding for a violation of UCMJ Artic le 92 (failure to obey a lawful order ). Violation s of UCMJ Article 92 may be punished with up to two years of confinement, this constitutes the “commission of a serious offense”, which forms the basis for discharge in this case. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or ineq uity and therefore considers the discharg e proper and equitable. Relief denied.

For the information of the Applicant, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a servicemember’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any u nusual circumstances during her less than three months in the U. S. Navy to warrant a change of service characterization to honorable.

The Applicant should also be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the eq uivalent of an honorable discharge.

 In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (from the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge , and evidence submitted by the Applicant ) to rebut the presumption.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until 29 March 2000, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation s of the UCMJ, Article 92, failure to obey a lawful order.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601020

    Original file (ND0601020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-AR, USNND06-01020Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060725Narrative Reason for Separation: Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN3620280Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: RTC GREAT LAKES ILApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to:Characterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20 The Discharge shall change : Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:Regarding equity, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700802

    Original file (ND0700802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date: 20071213Location: Washington D.C Representation: Discussion Issue 1 (): When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601142

    Original file (ND0601142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020425Reason for Discharge due to: ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENTLeast Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020425Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)20020426GCMCA Review Separation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601206

    Original file (ND0601206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decisional Issues: The NDRB under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000403Reason for Discharge - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000403Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601051

    Original file (ND0601051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030117Reason for Discharge erroneous entryLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER 20030123Narrative reason directed:ERRONEOUS ENTRYCharacterization directed: UNCHARACTERIZED Date Applicant Discharged: 20030128 Additional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700080

    Original file (ND0700080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendations: Administrative separation for the sleepwalking condition. ]19990916: Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital Corps School informed Commander NavyPersonnel Command of the Applicant’s discharge by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and convenience of the government –physical or mental conditions with a service characterization of entry level separation. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601064

    Original file (ND0601064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall -ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT.Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990414-19990509Active: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990510Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 19990602 Length of Service: 00Yrs 00 Mos 23 Days (does not exclude lost time, if any)Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 54Highest Rate/Rank:FRPerformance Evaluation Averages:NOT APPLICABLEAwards and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601059

    Original file (ND0601059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19991117Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19991117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Administrative Board Date: NOT APPLICABLERecommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLE Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700058

    Original file (ND0700058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not warrant a change in the Applicant’s characterization of service. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19911002Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATIONDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 19911002Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board Separation Authority...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601182

    Original file (ND0601182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040506: Recruit Evaluation Unit, Naval Hospital Great Lakes. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20040625Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040625Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Commanding Officer...