Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600879
Original file (ND0600879.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-EM2, USN
Docket No. ND06-00879

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060620 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ misconduct or RE-3 . ” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070405 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge s hall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct .

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues
Propriety: Proper discharge procedures were not followed .

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive:        USNR     19910524 – 19920518      COG
         Active:  USNR     19920519 - 19940520      HON
          Inactive:        USNR     19940521 – 19950322      HON
         Inactive:        ANG      19950323 – 19951129      COG
         Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       19951130 - 19960311       COG
          Active:  USN      19960312 - 20010604       HON
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20010605              Date of Discharge: 20041122

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 3 0 5 18
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 2 8
Years Contracted: 6

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 44/55

Highest Rate: EM2

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4 . 4 ( 5 )                        Behavior: 3 .0 ( 5 )                  OTA : 3 . 66

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Good Conduct Medal(2); National Defense Service Medal (2); Navy Achievement Medal; Navy “E” Ribbon; Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal; Southwest Asia Service Medal(2); Sea Service Deployment Ribbon


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010605 :  Reenlisted this date for a term of 6 years.
011111:  Civil Conviction: Duval County Courthouse, Jacksonville, FL for driving under the influence DUI (.101%).
Sentence: Fine $517.50, probation for 6 months, DUI School , license revoked for 6 months, impound vehicle for 10 days, community service for 50 hours, V ictim I mpact P anel.

020304:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Civil conviction in Duval County Court, Jacksonville, Florida on 011111 for driving under the influence DUI (.101%).), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued disciplinary and discharge warning.

 040509:  Applicant arrested and charged with DUI (BAC .216), unlawful speed and failed to drive within a single lane.

 040519 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from Branch Medical Clinic on 040510 .
         Award: Extra duty for 1 0 days, reduction to E- 4 . Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
040625:  Applicant notified via Notification procedure of recommendation for discharge by reason of Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure and Misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
         [Extracted from Record of Administrative Board, dated 041014.]

 040713:  Applicant admitted to Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program, Naval Hospital, Jacksonville, FL.
040803:  Applicant discharged from Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program. Discharge diagnosis: Alcohol dependence with physiological dependence. Aftercare program: Applicant required to participate in an aftercare program supervised by command.
040830:  Civil Conviction: Duval County Courthouse, Jacksonville, FL for violation of DUI (BAC .216) .
 Sentence: Fine and court cost of $915.00, jail for 30 days with 2 days credit (to be done on consecutive weekends beginning 040911) probation for 1 year, DUI S chool, Level II treatment, community service for 75 hours (10 hours per month), immobilize vehicle for 30 days.

040830:  Applicant notified via Administrative Board procedure of recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct, misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction.
          [Extracted from Record of Administrative Board, dated 041014.]
040930:  Administrative Discharge Board members advised that Applicant will not be processed for discharge on the basis of Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure.
 [Extracted from Record of Administrative Board, dated 041014.]
040930 :  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to pattern of misconduct, misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction ; that such misconduct warranted separation ; and by a vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.
041027 :  Command er, Southeast Regional Maintenance Activity, Mayport, FL, recommended the Applicant be discharge d by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct, misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction. Commander’s comments: “…This member’s performance on the job has been satisfactory…but I feel his personal conduct does not reflect good order and discipline…His history with alcohol has gotten the best of him and the Navy has spent enough time and effort…However, I believe the member does not deserve to be separated with an Other Than Honorable discharge…I therefore request a General (under honorable conditions) discharge .

041105 :  Commander, Navy Region Southeast directed the Applicant 's discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct with a characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) .

Service Record contains a partial Administrative Discharge package.
Service Record was missing some of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20041122 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB found that the dischar ge was proper and equitable ( B and C ). The NDRB presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affair s ( D ).
The NDRB construed Applicant’s statement, “…the command/Dept of the Navy changing all the required paperwork associated wit the reasoning of the discharge...,” to be a contention that proper procedures were not followed in his case. The NDRB noted that the record suggests that Applicant was initially notified of proposed separation by reason of Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure; however, was subsequently notified of separation on three bases of misconduct – commission of serious offense, pattern of misconduct, and civilian conviction. The Notifications and the Applicant’s Acknowledgements of Rights in regard to both are not contained in the record. However, the record clearly demonstrates that the Applicant was on notice of the bases for discharge that his Administrative Board considered; that the Applicant fully exercised his rights in that proceeding; that the Administrative Board’s conclusions were factually supported; and that the Separation Authority did not err in assigning the Narrative Reason for separation. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the discharge was proper.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning, alcohol abuse rehabilitation, a nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ, and 2 civil convictions for driving under the influence (DUI), also a violation of Article 111 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable "RE" code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 25 April 2005, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00238

    Original file (ND01-00238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.920201: Civil Conviction for theft; stolen license tag, driving while license suspended, faulty equipment [Extracted from CO's message].920218: Civil Conviction for driving while license suspended, faulty equipment, violation of probation for leaving the scene of an accident [Extracted from CO's message]. At...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00199

    Original file (ND00-00199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant attended an alcohol abuse education program, then he and his wife received marriage counseling at the Navy Family Service Center from April through August 1986. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. In regards to the employment and changed life issues: the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500740

    Original file (ND0500740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “financial hardship.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant requested that the Board change the narrative reason for his separation to "Financial Hardship", stating that he requested separation due to such hardship and was supported in this request by his Master Chief at the time. As of this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01250

    Original file (ND99-01250.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. 950606: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00138

    Original file (ND02-00138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00138 Applicant’s Request This application for discharge review, received 011022, requested that the characterization of service awarded to the Applicant upon his discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. In submitting DD Form 293 Review of Discharge, I am requesting the board update my discharge to Honorable and change my reentry code to allow me to reenlist and continue serving my country.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00147

    Original file (ND99-00147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00147 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981106, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. The applicant was discharged 961104] Commanding officer discharged applicant with General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. SN (applicant) was separated from the Naval service with the characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00792

    Original file (ND02-00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's current enlistment DD Form 214 (2) Applicant's previous enlistment DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 761222 - 770530 COG USNR (DEP) 820610 - 820616 COG Active: USN 770531 - 810530 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 820617 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01068

    Original file (ND00-01068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states: “My other than honorable discharge was inequitable because it was based on a civilian matter, after 6 years of service time. This matter has truly affected my life.” The applicant’s issue is without merit. The record shows that the applicant’s civil conviction occurred while he...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00273

    Original file (ND04-00273.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00273 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031201. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 000910: Arrest and Booking Report: Member arrested by Jacksonville Sheriff’s Office for driving Under Influence of Alcohol (DUI).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00617

    Original file (ND03-00617.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 881004: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongfully write 5 signatures on a request chit on 880926, violation of UCMJ Article 86: UA 8 hours on 880926. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.