Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600845
Original file (ND0600845.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SKSA, USN
Docket No. ND06-00845

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060605 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ Anything .” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070315 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214. Block 24 , Character of Service , should read: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS .” The Commander, Navy Personnel Command, Millington, TN, will be notified, recommending the DD Form 214 be corrected or reissued, as appropriate.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Applicant Issues, as stated
The Applicant is requesting an upgrade of his discharge characterization to General or honorable.

The Applicant is requesting a narrative reason change to anything.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade base on post service accomplishments.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade based on youth and immaturity.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade so that he may re-enter the service.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2)
Employment Reference Letter , dtd May 18, 2006
 Criminal Arrest Record Request, dtd May 16, 2006
 Transcript from New Mexico State University
Excerpts from Service Record (52 pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20010614 - 20020611       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20020611              Date of Discharge: 20030117

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 00 0 7 0 7
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 7 (Parental Consent)

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 8 0
Highest Rate: SKS A

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2 .0 ( 1 )              Behavior: 2 .0 ( 1 )                          OTA: 2 .00
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

* 020 1 08:         NAVPERS 1070/613 issued. Applicant refused prescribed drug abuse treatment . Applicant is aware that refusal to comply with the prescribed treatment constituted a failure of rehabilitation and could be used for Admin or OTH separation.

021210 :  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 021205 , tested positive for THC .
021217 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct drug abuse.

0 21217 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel , elected to waive all rights .

 0 30107 :  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of drug abuse .
0 30113 :  GCMCA, Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct drug abuse.

* The NDRB believes the date of this entry was actually 0 3 0 1 08 vice 020108.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20030117 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade of his discharge characterization to General or honorable. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for illegal drug use, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. For the edification of the Applicant, r egulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considers his discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade base d on post service accomplishments. The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade based on youth and immaturity. The statement contained in the application that the Applicant’s admission was due to his youth and immaturity was found to be insufficient justification to warrant a change in the reason for discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant is requesting an upgrade so that he may re-enter the service. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .















PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601051

    Original file (ND0601051.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030117Reason for Discharge erroneous entryLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030117Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER 20030123Narrative reason directed:ERRONEOUS ENTRYCharacterization directed: UNCHARACTERIZED Date Applicant Discharged: 20030128 Additional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00467

    Original file (ND04-00467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800816

    Original file (MD0800816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention the command unfairly singled him out for ridicule or discipline. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual,para 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001097

    Original file (ND1001097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    : (Decisional) () .The Applicant contends he had two previous periods of enlistment with honorable service, thus suggesting that his record of service during those enlistments warrant consideration for upgrading his discharge to Honorable.Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Naval service to maintain proper order and discipline. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700238

    Original file (MD0700238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two discharge warnings, one nonjudicial punishment for violating the UCMJ Article(s) 92, Failure to obey order, regulation and 111, Drunken driving, and a guilty finding at Special Court-Martial for Article(s) 86, Unauthorized absence over thirty days and 112a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. After a thorough...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600974

    Original file (MD0600974.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Decisional Issues Equity – Post service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19920506 - 19930104 COG Active: None Period of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600467

    Original file (ND0600467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Thank you for this right and reviewing this application. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600482

    Original file (ND0600482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated Equity – Post Service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from D_ W. M_, Ed.D., Executive Director, Teen Challenge of the Midwest, dtd February 1, 2006Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900928 - 19910714 COG Active: USA-NG 19900306 –...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700582

    Original file (MD0700582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the Applicant’s undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. 20040106 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100604

    Original file (ND1100604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service during her enlistment period reflects one NAVPERS 1070/613 retention-counseling warning being issued. Furthermore, the Applicant’s service record documents four nonjudicial punishments (NJPs) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), specifically: Article 86 (Absent without leave, 4 specifications of unauthorized absence); Article 87 (Missing movement); Article 89 (Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer); Article 91...