Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00467
Original file (ND04-00467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-EOCA, USN
Docket No. ND04-00467

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040127. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040922. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

No issues were submitted by the Applicant.


Documentation
In addition to the service record the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from D_ J. H_, Esq. Director of Office of Compliance Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food and Drug Administration dated October 4, 2002 (3 pages)
FDA News Letter to Yellow Jacket Promoters dated October 7, 2002
Computer Printout on FDA Cracks Down on Ephedra Product
Computer Printout on DOD Urinalysis Drug Test Program (4 pages)
Letter of Recommendation dated January 10, 2003
Copy of Drug Testing Program Urinalysis Register
Copy of Applicant Witness Statement dated November 19, 2002 (2 pages)
Copy of Evaluation Report & Counseling Record
Copy of Urinalysis Report (2 pages)
Copy of Preliminary Inquiry Report (2 pages)
Copy of Commanding Officer’s Recommendation for Separation (2 pages)
Letter to Congresswoman B_ dated November 25, 2003 (2 pages)
Letter from Congresswoman B_ dated June 18, 2003 (2 pages)
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant
Letter from Applicant’s Wife

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None
         Inactive: USAR            970109 – 970401  ELS
 Active: USN                        None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 010214               Date of Discharge: 030117

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 04
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 27                          Years Contracted: 4 (12 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 38

 Highest Rate: EOCN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.50 (2)    Behavior: 2.50 (2)                OTA: 3.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

021115:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 021108, tested positive for [Amphetamine/methamphetamine] [Extracted from Case File].
021126:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: On 021108 did wrongfully use a controlled substance, methamphetamine/amphetamine.
Award: Forfeiture of $619.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days (3 days restriction and extra duty suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record [Extracted from Case File].
021204:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse [Extracted from Case File].
021204:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation [Extracted from Case File].
030108:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse [Extracted from Case File].

NO DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AVAILABLE

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20030117 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the Board in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of a positive employment record, a drug free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Board determined that the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01047

    Original file (ND04-01047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 030527: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. 030528: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00684

    Original file (ND02-00684.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030116. 001003: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, by a vote 2-1 that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, it is with my strongest recommendation that Petty Officer C_ (Applicant) be discharged from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00585

    Original file (ND03-00585.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Member was found non drug dependent.980213: Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group ONE directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01169

    Original file (ND02-01169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Applicant’s service record (59 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 820623 - 830608 COG Active: USN 830609 - 970605 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970606 Date of Discharge: 010830 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 04 02...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01366

    Original file (ND03-01366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01081

    Original file (ND03-01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01119

    Original file (ND03-01119.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01119 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030612. R_ W_ (Applicant)” Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00418

    Original file (ND03-00418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. On 13 Oct 98, PR3 S_ (Applicant) went to NJP for two specifications of Article 86 and two specifications of Article 112a. The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was inequitably or improperly denied treatment for his drug use.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00218

    Original file (ND04-00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00218 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031119. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Request for correction from Applicant, dated February 3, 2003.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00215

    Original file (ND03-00215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. DCFA (Applicant) received the maximum punishment at NJP for Driving Under the Influence, Drug Use, and Failure to Obey a lawful order or regulation, Drinking Under Age.As per his character, DCFA (Applicant) has continued to perform both this punishment and regular duties in an exemplary fashion. 011015: Chief of Naval Personnel recommended to Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), Applicant’s discharge...