Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600693
Original file (ND0600693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-AA, USN
Docket No. ND06-00693

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060426. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070209 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Iss ues

Equity: Characterization not equitable based on overall record.

Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:

Applicant’s DD Form 215 (Member 4)
 Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Members Copy 4)
18 pages of Applicant’s service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19960617 - 19961006       COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19961007              Date of Discharge: 19980731

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 1 0 9 25
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 21

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 1 2       (attendance based)                 AFQT: 54

Highest Rate: AN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks) * :

 Performance: 3.0 ( 2 )     Behavior: 3 .0 ( 2 )                 OTA: 3 .00

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214) ** : Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Armed Forces Service Medal, NATO Medal, Battle “E” Ribbon

*Derived from Applicant’s submission
**Service record also indicates Letter of Commendation x 2.

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (U NDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) /MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980424 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs): Dereliction of duties , failure to properly use government American Express card .
Award: E xtra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 2 (suspended for 6 months) . No indication of appeal in the record.
980504:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Dereliction in the performance of duties.) Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
980715:  Civil conviction: Applicant pled guilty to Assault (Class D offense) on 980714, in State of Maine, Division of Bath-Brunswick Court.
         Sentence: $200.00 fine.
980723:  Reduction in pay grade awarded and suspended at NJP on 980424 vacated due to continued misconduct.
98072 3 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 123 a: Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds.
         Specification: In that AN L_ P. M_, USN (Applicant) , Patrol Squadron EIGHT, NAS Brunswick, Maine, on active duty, did, in or about Brunswick, Maine from or about 971115 to about 971224, with intent to defraud and for the procurement of merchandise, wrongfully and unlawfully make to various local merchants, certain checks upon the Navy Federal Credit Union in words and figures as follows, to wit: $376.31 to Walmart; $246.95 to All State Glass; $83.25 to VIP; $331.83 to T.J. Max, then knowing that she the maker thereof, did not or would not have sufficient funds in or credit with such bank for the payment of the said checks in full upon its presentment.
         Award: Forfeiture of $1/2 pay per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
980724 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to civilian conviction.

980724:  A pplicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
980731 :  Commanding Officer, Patrol Squadron 8, UIC: 09661 , informs Chief of Naval Personnel of Applicant’s discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, misconduct due to a commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to civilian conviction. Commanding Officer’s comments: “ AA M_ (Applicant) failed to meet the standards of conduct which are integral to the good order and discipline of the Naval service. She committed numerous violations of the UCMJ, including a civilian conviction for assault. Her counseling record contains numerous instances of failure to keep the chain of command informed of personal and work related problems. She has been thoroughly counseled regarding these deficiencies yet has made no noticeable progress toward correcting same. AA M_ is either unable or unwilling to conform to the regulations and standards of conduct of the U. S. Navy. I am administratively separating AA M _ with a General Under Honorable Conditi ons characterization of service .”
Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19980731 by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning, 2 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 92 and 123a of the UCMJ, and a civil conviction for assault (also a violation of Article 128 of the UCMJ ) . The NDRB advises the Applicant that certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Violations of Article 123a and 128 are considered serious offenses and a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged at a special or general court-martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of her characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.
The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Nor does the NDRB have jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces. The NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Reenlistment policy of the Naval service or Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commander, Navy Recruiting Command, 5722 Integrity Drive, Bldg 784, Millington, TN 38054 An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective
12 Dec 97 until 29 March 2000, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 123a, Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds, and 128, Assault .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that . You should read Enclosure (5) of the before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00055

    Original file (ND04-00055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00055 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031006. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :020801: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 117 provoking speeches and gestures, violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault.Award: Forfeiture of $552.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500815

    Original file (ND0500815.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ONLY EVIDENCE IS SIGN-IN SHEETS AT AA MEETINGS.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990921 - 20010111 ELS USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00429

    Original file (ND04-00429.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 950404: Reduction to E-3 awarded at CO’s NJP of 941104 vacated this date due to continued misconduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00713

    Original file (ND00-00713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.910903: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and convenience of the government due to personality disorder. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00317

    Original file (MD00-00317.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00317 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000107, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the seriousness of the applicant’s NJP is not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501167

    Original file (ND0501167.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) (2 copies) Form from Department of Veterans Affairs Letter from Applicant, dated October 16, 2005 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01007

    Original file (ND00-01007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.960315: Forfeiture of $404.00 for 1 month and RIR to E-3 suspended at CO's NJP of 960224 vacated due to continued misconduct.960316: USS NIMITZ notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by his violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (2 Specifications), Failure to obey order and violation of general regulation; Article 123a Making...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00930

    Original file (MD99-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00930 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990630, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. History Iwas accused and convicted, at Office Hours, of Article 123a - Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds.While serving my punishment two (2) days later, I was charged with Article 90 - Willfully disobeying an order. Not appealed.910919: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 90:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601128

    Original file (MD0601128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010817 - 20010916 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010917Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20040416Length of Service Active: 02 Yrs 07Mths00 Dys (Does not exclude lost time) Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 43 MOS: 3043Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONE FOUND IN RECORDAwards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):RIFLE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501031

    Original file (MD0501031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01031 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050601. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).The Applicant contends that his discharge was improper because he was not given the opportunity to...