Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600689
Original file (ND0600689.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SHSR, USN
Docket No. ND06-00689

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060427 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070208 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.











PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues

Equity – Youth

Equity – Stressful f amily situation


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
 Letter from Applicant, dtd April 20, 2006

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20040130 - 20040517       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20040518              Date of Discharge: 20050331

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 00 1 0 14 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 16 da y s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 9

Years Contracted: 4 ( 12 -month extension)

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: NA*

Highest Rate: SHSA

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 1 .0 ( 1 )              Behavior: 1 .0 ( 1 )                  OTA: 1 . 33

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal

* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

0 50128 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A : Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
Award: Forfeiture of $ 642.55 pay per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 1 . No indication of appeal in the record.
050206 :  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 22 00 , 050206 .
050215:  Applicant missed ship movement.

 0 50222 :  Applicant returned at 1145, 050222.

050306:  Applicant found fit for confinement.

050331:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged this date with a characterization of Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, Separation Code “HKK” (drug abuse), by reason of misconduct.

Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.
Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20050331 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).
Equity – Young age, stressful situation: The Applicant states that he was young at the time of his misconduct and was dealing with the death of his cousin.

 While the Applicant may feel that his young age, combined with the death of his cousin, was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. Violation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense, for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a special or general court martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse .
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600963

    Original file (ND0600963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was separated on the basis of misconduct due to drug abuse, a violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient at this time to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500115

    Original file (ND0500115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant received a drug and alcohol dependency evaluation by a Medical Officer on 900306. After a careful review of the Applicant's post service documentation, in addition to his official service record and supporting documentation, the Board found that relief is warranted for equity reasons.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600872

    Original file (MD0600872.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests an unspecified change to the Separation Code received at discharge, and the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The record clearly demonstrates, and the Applicant does not deny, that the Applicant used cocaine less than 9 months after entering the active duty. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600936

    Original file (ND0600936.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Decisional Issues Equity – Isolated incident Youthful age and “mental problems ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700882

    Original file (MD0700882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600359

    Original file (ND0600359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Recommend VA system treatment programs be made available to him after separation if he wishes to use them.900730: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse, that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700291

    Original file (MD0700291.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20050331 - 20050508 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20050509Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20060328Length of Service: 00 Yrs 10Mths20 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500759

    Original file (MD0500759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01124

    Original file (MD01-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 215 Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of cousin's order of service pamphlet PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940216 - 941127 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 941128 Date of Discharge: 951025 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01154

    Original file (ND99-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was not discharged though. Violation of UCMJ, Articles 86, 92, 128, and 134), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. He remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, to discuss his post-service accomplishments, provided an application is received by the NDRB within fifteen years from the date of his discharge.