Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01124
Original file (MD01-01124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01124

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010821, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to 10 U.S.C. 1173 HARDSHIP DISCHARGE. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character and narrative reason of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. CHICAGO, IL DEC 1994 - HOT WATER TANK BUSTS AT HOME, I'M NOT THERE TO HELP.

2. SAN DIEGO, CA DEC 1994 IN BOOT CAMP, IN MRP WITH PNEUMONIA FIRST TIME AWAY FROM HOME AT CHRISTMAS

3. SAN DIEGO, CA MAR 1995 GRADUATED FROM BOOT CAMP, GIRLFRIEND PREGANT.

4. SAN DIEGO, CA APR 19, 1995 OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING

5. SAN DIEGO, CA APR 1995 COMPLETED MARINE COMBAT TRAINING, WAS INFORMED THAT I COULD BE A 7212(STINGER GUNNER) INSTEAD OF AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER.

6. EL PASO, TX MAY 1995 GIRLFRIEND HAS A MISCARRIAGE COUSIN HAVING PROBLEMS WITH HIS FAMILYAND _'S MOTHER.

7. EL PASO, TX JUN 1995 WENT AWOL.

8. HOUSTON TX AUG 1995 COUSIN DIED (DOC 2)

THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT LEAD TO MY UNFORTUNATE DISCHARGE. TRY TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT MY SUPERIORS WERE JUST DOING THEIR WHEN THEY HAD THE TASK OF WRITING UP THE REPORT FOR MY DISCHARGE. BASICLY THEY SAY WHAT THEY HAD TO SAY TO GET ME OUT. ALL OF THIS WAS DONE ON A HURRIED PASSAS YOU CAN SEE BY THE MANY CORRECTIONS ON MY DD-215(DOC 3). IN BLOCK 27, MEMBER 4 OF THE DD-214 WOULD ALSO APPRECIATE A HIGHER RE-CODE SO I WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO SERVE THESE UNITED STATES. I AM DOING ALL OF THIS BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO ENTER THE ARMED FORCES. P.S. THE RANK OF E-2 WOULD BE NICE AS WELL.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 215
Copy of DD Form 214
Copy of cousin's order of service pamphlet
PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940216 - 941127  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941128               Date of Discharge: 951025

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 10 28
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 73

 Highest Rank: Pvt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (2)                       Conduct: 3.6 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 26

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940214:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
950727:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
 Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0801, 11Jun95 to 1330, 7Jul95 (26 days/surrendered).
Awarded forfeiture of $250.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 30 days. Not appealed.
950727:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [Your lack of discipline, failure to follow rules and regulations, your lack of responsibility and integrity]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
950808:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was positive urinalysis confirmed by Army Form DD 2624 Feb 93 dated 26 July 95.

950810:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [Illegal drug involvement, specifically usage identified by Tripler Army Medical Center Forensic Toxicology Drug Testing Lab T9507-086 as positive THC]. Advised that processing for administrative separation is mandatory.
950810:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
950810:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

951003:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

951006:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases Western Area] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 951025 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issues 1-4, 6-8. The Board found no indication the applicant was unfairly denied a request for a hardship discharge during his enlistment. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. No other narrative reason more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s processing for administrative separation. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Issue 5. The Board found no impropriety or inequity in the fact the applicant was assigned the MOS of a Stinger Gunner. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00345

    Original file (ND99-00345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Enlisted Performance Record 840130-850903 (previously reviewed by NDRB) Enlisted Performance Record 800304-830816 (previously reviewed by NDRB) Navy Occupation/Training/Award History 820307-850412 (previously reviewed by NDRB) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00251

    Original file (ND02-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 910221 - 910530 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910531 Date of Discharge: 930222 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08 22 Inactive: None CA action 930122: Sentence approved and ordered...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00638

    Original file (MD00-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950510: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.950621: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00356

    Original file (MD00-00356.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :850928: Applicant tested positive for THC during a random urinalysis (NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, CA message 042058Z Oct85.851015: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a episodic drug abuser, not drug dependent At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00677

    Original file (ND01-00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00677 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010420, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief based on this issue is not warranted.The applicant’s issue 3 states: “We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the applicant's discharge be reviewed for Clemency due to post service.” The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00098

    Original file (ND01-00098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to San Diego, CA. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 960405 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A).

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00968

    Original file (ND99-00968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    921208: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, recommended applicant be retained. 950407: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00979

    Original file (ND99-00979.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Now at this time almost six years since my discharge I am respectfully requesting that my discharge be now upgraded to a full honorable discharge. The applicant’s service was marred by the applicant’s positive urinalysis on two separate occasions. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00435

    Original file (ND04-00435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00415

    Original file (ND01-00415.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Copies of Property Receipt/Report from Sacramento County Sheriff's Department Letter from Attorney at Law D___ A. G____ 3 Receipts and Business Card from Attorney at Law D____ A. G___ PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 880831- 920830 Hon (RELACDU) Inactive:...