Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600665
Original file (ND0600665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-MMFN, USN
Docket No. ND06-00665

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060216. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant designated the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070201 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.




PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues

The Applicant is requesting a change in his discharge from other than honorable to honorable. The Applicant claims he is living a life to correct his past mistakes.

Documentation
In addition to the service and medical record s , the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214
 Two pages from applicant’s service record
Applicant’s statement, undated
Letter to Congressman L_ from B_ T_, Mayor, City of Sultan, dated March 22, 2005
Letter from Department of Veterans Affairs, dated November 18, 1993
Job/Character Reference ltr from J_ D_, Market Area Vice-President and General Manager, Waste Management of Washington, Inc., dated October 23, 2003
Job/Character Reference ltr from J_ W. D_, District Manager, dated June 10, 2002
Character Reference ltr from D_ M_, Transportation Supervisor, Sultan School District, dated November 19, 2004
 Statement in support of claim from D_ L. G_, dated October 7, 2005
Appointment of Veterans Service Organization as Claimant’s Representative, dated January 25, 2006

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19860722 - 19870630       COG
          Active: USN      19870701 - 19900627       HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19900628              Date of Discharge: 19930603

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 2 11 06
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 22

Years Contracted: 4 ( 3 -month extension)

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 26

Highest Rate: MM 3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.4 ( 7 )               Behavior: 3.3 ( 7 )                  OTA: 3 . 43

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Second Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, Southwest Asia Service Medal, Na tional Defense Service Medal, Navy Good Conduct Medal for the period ending 91Jun30


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900628 :  Reenlisted this date for a term of 4 years.
930201:  Random urinalysis conducted on 930201. [Extracted from Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report of 930212]
930210 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 541. 0 5 per month for 2 month s , reduction to E- 3 . No indication of appeal in the record.
930312 :  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Amphetamines abuse, less than monthly, ashore off duty. Random urinalysis on 930201. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: Member was assigned to USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72) 900809 to 920821. Overall performance evaluations averaged 3.7.
         Member reported on board SIMA San Francisco, 920828, received CO’s letter of appreciation for job “well done” on 921015.
         Member has no potential for productive naval service.
         Member to be processed for separation IAW CNO MSG R-122032Z Feb 92.
930315 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

930317 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to submit a statement.

930413:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Screening: Referred to DAPA due to a positive for amphetamines. Medical Officer found Applicant psychological drug dependent and recommends administrative separation, but eligible for care at VA medical center substance abuse program.

 930420:  Applicant ’s statement for Administrative Board consideration.

930423 :  Commanding Officer, recommended discharge under other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

930428 :  BUPERS, directed the Applicant 's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19930603 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant requested a change in his discharge from other than honorable to honorable. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violation of Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances) of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant claims he is living a life to correct his past mistakes. The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 1 12a (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances).

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501435

    Original file (ND0501435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01086

    Original file (ND04-01086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Evaluations (5 pages) Applicant’ s DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990621 - 990907 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 990908 Date of Discharge: 020508 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 08 01 Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600491

    Original file (ND0600491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. AKAN V_’s continued presence in this command is prejudicial to the good order to conduct of the naval service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501474

    Original file (ND0501474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19921102 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. The Board advises the Applicant and counsel that when the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600452

    Original file (MD0600452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500488

    Original file (ND0500488.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.116 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue(s) and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition.Our review of the service record reflects that this former member maintained satisfactory 3.3 performance / 3.2 conduct markings. Accordingly, we rest this case on the evidence of record. The names, and votes of the members of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600793

    Original file (ND0600793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620. The Applicant requests upgrade in order to obtain educational benefits and because he needs a better job to “support” his “family.” The Veterans Administration determines...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600322

    Original file (MD0600322.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Therefore, it is in the bet interest of the Marine Corps to separate Private A_ (Applicant) with an other than honorable discharge.030916: Applicant placed on voluntary leave awaiting Administrative Separation.030930: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.031015: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00066

    Original file (ND03-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00066 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021010, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 880229 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01454

    Original file (ND04-01454.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.010928: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (violation of UCMJ Articles 86: Absence without leave and Article 87: Missing movement), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued...