Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600046
Original file (ND0600046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND06-00046

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20051004. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable if possible or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that he was approaching the 15-year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington D.C. area. Applicant did not respond.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060717. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction .
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“It has been 14 years, I’m believing it should be moved up. I was told at time of Discharge it would move up over time.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Statement from Applicant, dtd September 23, 2005

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19900127 - 19900722      COG
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19900723             Date of Discharge: 19911030

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 03 08 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 36 days
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 18

 Years Contracted: 4 (24 month extension)

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 55

 Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                                    Behavior: NA*             OTA: NA*

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): None.
* Not Available


 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct-Convicted by a civil court for offense(s) occurring during term of military service, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910425:  U. S. Naval Investigative Service report.

910425:  Applicant arrested and charged with sexual assault second degree and risk on injury to a minor.

 910924:  Civil Conviction: Willimantic Court for violation of risk of injury to a minor charge.
 Sentence: Confinement for 5 years; suspended after 18 months, and probation for 3 years and no contact with the victim. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 911011.]
910924:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 1600 on 910924.

 911001:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the characterization of service may be under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious civilian offense as evidenced by your felony conviction for Risk of Injury to a Minor.
911001:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights.
911011:  Commanding Officer, Naval Submarine School recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious civilian offense as evidenced by felony conviction for risk of injury to a minor. Commanding Officer’s comments: “(1) On 1 October 1991, SA J_(Applicant) was notified of his pending administrative discharge in person at the Brooklyn State Penitentiary in Connecticut. He chose to waive all of his rights.
         (2) On 8 October 1991, SA J_(Applicant)’s Defense Counsel, Attorney M_ K_ was contacted. He stated that due to the voluntary plea of guilty by SA J_(Applicant), he was not entitled to appeal his case. SA J_(Applicant) has not been in contact with his attorney since the conviction.
         (3) Due to the serious nature of the offense which SA J_(Applicant) has committed, he is unsuitable for further Naval service. I recommend he be expeditiously discharged with an Other Than Honorable characterization.”

911028:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct (civil conviction).

 911030:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0800 on 911030 (36 days).
*Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged, in absentia, on 19911030 by reason misconduct due to civil conviction (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant requests an upgrade based on equity. The applicant states, “It has been 14 years, I’m believing it should be moved up. I was told at time of Discharge it would move up over time. ” The NDRB advises the Applicant that there is no law or regulation that authorizes a discharge to be automatically upgraded. A former service member has 15 years, from the date of discharge, to petition the Board for consideration of an upgrade. The Board does not automatically or incrementally upgrade a discharge over any specified period of time. Relief is denied

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a felony civil conviction for sexual assault second degree and risk or injury to a minor, which is the equivalent of a violation of UCMJ Article 134 (indecent assault). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. The NDRB advises the Applicant that certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. A violation of Article 134 is considered a serious offense and typically warrants a punitive discharge if adjudged at a special or general court-martial. Further, when a member is convicted of a felony that includes a sentence to confinement for more than 1 year (whether suspended or not) or an offense involving sexual perversion, processing is mandatory. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge. The Applicant’s misconduct is clearly documented, therefore, relief is denied.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 (indecent assault).

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00924

    Original file (MD04-00924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. 911024: GCMCA [CG, MCCDC] directed the Applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500990

    Original file (ND0500990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding Officer’s comments: “RMSA J_ (Applicant) is being processed for separation by reasons of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, and other designated physical or mental conditions. Based on the circumstances of this case, I concur with the Board’s majority recommendation that RMSA J_ (Applicant) be separated from the naval service with a discharge characterization of General. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard of acceptable conduct and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00482

    Original file (ND03-00482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.940413 Applicant plead guilty to felony injury of a child.940607: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and civilian...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500503

    Original file (ND1500503.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501386

    Original file (MD0501386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Commanding Officer’s comments: “Lance Corporal J_(Applicant) was convicted on 13 August 2002 on felony charges of drug possession and sentenced to pay a $500.00 fine and serve 1 year on probation. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 112a (wrongful use, possession of controlled...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00002

    Original file (ND00-00002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this issue is without merit. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to: DA Military Review Boards Agency Management Information and Support Directorate Armed Forces...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00307

    Original file (MD02-00307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00307 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020116, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Release due to personal problems due to PTSD.” The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00096

    Original file (ND00-00096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 27 Years Contracted: 6 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 93 Highest Rate: ET1 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.86 (6) Behavior: 3.53 (6) OTA: 3.83 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NEM, NAM, GCA, NDM Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT - Convicted by a civil court for offense(s) occurring...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00784

    Original file (ND04-00784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-RMSN, USN Docket No. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600500

    Original file (ND0600500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. A: Non-dependent alcohol/drug abuser incidental/experiment P: Other: Not available for drug use.921007: Ltr from Applicant, dtd October 7, 1992,concerning NJP on 920915921008: Commanding Officer, USS KLAKRING (FFG 42), recommended to Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of...