Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601213

Original file (MD0601213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
MD06-01213

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:                               20 060907
         Characterization of Service:
         Basis for Discharge :
         Discharge Authority :                       MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.3
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    MWSS-172 MWSG-17 OKINAWA JAPAN

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
         Representation:

Applicant’s issues:
1. Re cord of service .
2. Unfair discharge characterization due to two different incidents.

Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date of Decision:                                            2007080 9
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      PROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

Issue 1 (Equity). When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning, one nonjudicial punishment for Article 121, and a guilty finding and sentence at a Special Court-Martial for Article 92. V iolation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article s 92 and 121 are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate .

Issue 2 (Equity). In order to be administratively discharged due to a pattern of misconduct, a minimum of two incidents occurring within one enlistment is required. The infractions may be minor or more serious and there must be discreditable involvement with civil or military authorities or conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. The misconduct need not have been the subject of NJP or military or civilian conviction and the incidents of misconduct do not have to be of the same nature . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he was wrongfully charged and disciplined. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                               20020118 - 20020505
Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:                                 20020506
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20051123
Length of Service
         Active:                                     3 Yrs 6 Mths 9 D ys (does not exclude lost time)
Time Lost During This Period:                      9
Days UA:
Days Confinement:                                   9

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 84
MOS:                                                  0651
Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               4. 4 ( 8 ) / 3. 9 ( 8 )

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, LETTER OF APPRECIATION, RIFLE MARKSMAN BADGE

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20020108:        Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

20050112 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 121: Larceny, on or about 20041002, stole $400.00 cash from the ATM account of CPL W_.
         Award: Forfeiture of ½ month pay for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2.
         Not appealed.

20050124:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Results of non-judicial punishment . N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20050721 :        Special Court-Martial (trial dates 20050720 & 20050721) .
         Charge I : V iolation of the UCMJ, Article 92 .
         Specification 1 : Did between 20050215 and 20050513, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: S ECNAVINST 5300.28C, by wrongfully using a controlled substance analogue, natural substance, chemical, propellant, and/or a prescribed or over the counter drug, or pharmaceutical compound with intent to induce intoxication, excitement, and/or stupefaction of the central nervous system . Plea : Not Guilty. Finding: Withdrawn.
         Specification 2: Did between 20030801 and 20050305, violate a lawful general regulation, to wit: DoD Directive 5500.7-R, by wrongfully using a government computer for unofficial and unauthorized purposes. Plea : Guilty. Finding: Guilty E/S.
         Charge II: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 121.
         Specification: Did, between 20030801 and 20050315, steal (1) Dell laptop computer, CPU HH4YG11 with components, property, of a value greater than $500.00, the property of the U.S. Government. Plea : Not Guilty. Finding: Not Guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 11 days, forfeiture of $800.00, restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-1.
         CA action: Not found in record.

20050721:        Applicant to confinement [Extracted from DD Form 214].

20050730:        Applicant from confinement [Extracted from DD Form 214].

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:                                       20050801
Basis for Discharge:                                DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20050802
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Administrative Board Date:                          20050929
Findings          BY : DUE TO A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT
                                                      BY SEPARATION WARRANTED
         Recommendation on Separation:             BY
Recommendation on Characterization:               BY UNANIMOUS VOTE UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 2005 0803 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20051115 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ^ST MARINE AIRCRAFT WING ( 20051115 )
         Basis for discharge directed:             DUE TO A
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20051123

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:                               4
Related to Period of Service Under Review:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:
Related to Other Period(s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                                          Finances:
         Health/Medical Records:                            Substance Abuse:
         Family/Personal Status:                            Education:
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:
         Criminal Records:
Other:
         Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representative:


Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121, Larceny and Article 92, Failure to obey order, regulation.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800804

Original file (MD0800804.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700064

Original file (MD0700064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Not appealed.20000222: SummaryCourt-Martial: Charge I: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specifications). (20000303) SJA review (date): (20000412)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION, II...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601075

Original file (MD0601075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMCMD06-01075Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060808Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCTCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: mwss 172 mwsg 17 1stmaw okinawa jaApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20070628Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701100

Original file (ND0701100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Sentence - Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601150

Original file (MD0601150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [Bad Conduct Discharge] Record of Trial Complete: Date Charge(s) Preferred: 19930225 Date Charges Referred to Special Court-Martial:19930308Trial Date: 19930416Applicant requested Bad Conduct Discharge:Date Applicant to Pre-trial Confinement: 19930330 Date Applicant from Pre-trial Confinement: 19930416 Date Applicant to Confinement:19930524Date Applicant from Confinement: 19930607Date Applicant to Voluntary Appellate Leave:19930616Date Applicant to Involuntary...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700019

Original file (ND0700019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Issues 1 and 2: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20051117Reason for Discharge - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT - - Least...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701177

Original file (ND0701177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date: 20080124Location:Washington D.C Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301374

Original file (MD1301374.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s service and medical records and documentation submitted by the Applicant, the NDRB determined PTSD did not mitigate his misconduct and clemency is not warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700588

Original file (ND0700588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20030625 - 20031201Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031202Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20051115Length of Service: 01 Yrs 11Mths03 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700930

Original file (MD0700930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20030228 - 20030526 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030527Years Contracted:5; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060427Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11 Mths01 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601213

Similar Decisions