Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601123
Original file (MD0601123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCPL, USMC
MD06-01123

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060816
Characterization of Service:                       UNDER
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.6
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       1STBN 11THMAR 1 st mardiv CAMPEN CA

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change to:              
         Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
Representation:                                             


Decision:
Date of Decision:                                            20070706
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
 Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

 By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT DUE TO COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS                                          OFFENSE        

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Receive Veteran’s Administration benefits.
2. Discharge was inequitable because the civilian charge was expunged from my record.
3 . Post service.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                               19881130-19890213

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment:                                 19890214
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  19930611
Length of Service
         Active:                                      04 Yrs 03 Mths 28 D ys (Does not exclude lost time)
Time Lost During This Period:                      141
        
Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                     18
AFQT:                                                 37
MOS:                                                  2531
Highest Rank:                                        LCPL

Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               4.3 (12) / 4.2 (12)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON , NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, COMBAT ACTION RIBBON, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, KUWAIT LIBERATION MEDAL, SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL (W/2 STARS) , MERITORIOUS MAST


Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

19900224 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 134: Did on or about 19900110 make and utter to Marine Corps West Federal Credit Union certain checks in figures as follow, to wit: $2 , 314.00 for the purchase of article and the procurement of lawful currency, and did thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds in the MCW F ederal Credit Union for payment of checks in full upon presentment for payment .
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 362 .00 for 2 months (suspended for 6 months) , restriction for 45 days (suspended for 6 months), extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 1 .
         Not appealed.
19920319:        LC pl H_’ son, A. M. H_, JR. was taken to Menifee Hospital, Riverside, CA for bleeding from the mouth and breathing problems. Applicant stated that child had fallen from the couch and cut his mouth and nose. Child was released from hospital but returned later that day where he expired.

19920323:        LC pl H_ was interviewed by Riverside County Sheriff Department and related same story.

19920326:        Applicant returned to Riverside County Sheriff Department and changed story. Claimed that he had flick the child in the mouth to get him to stop crying. Coroner initially could not confirm that this was the cause of death. Applicant released. Coroner’s report subsequently showed baby died from chemical reaction caused by blood in the lung.

19930127:        LCpl H_ was taken into custody by Riverside County Sheriff Department and charged with murder.


Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process:                                 
Date Notified:                                       19930310
Basis for Discharge:                                DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   
Record Supports Narrative Reason:                         

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 NOT FOUND IN RECOR D
Rights Elected at Notification:
Consult with Counsel                                NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Obtain Copies                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Submit Statement(s) (date)                                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Administrative Board                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ( 19930315 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 19930513 )
Separation Authority (date):                       COMMANDING GENERAL 1ST MARDIV ( 19930524 )
Narrative Reason directed:                                  MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         19930611


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                              1      
         Other Period of Service:                                    0      
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0      
         Education :                                           1      
         Employment :                                          0      
         Health /Medical :                                       0      
         Character Statements:                               0      
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0      
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             1      
Other Documentation (Describe Below)                      1      

Total Number of Pages:                              4      

D escription of Other Documentation:
        Court Order dated June 23, 2004,      
        





Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Receive Veteran’s Administration benefits.
2. Discharge was inequitable because the civilian charge was expunged from my record.
3. Post service.

Issue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue.

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issues 2-3 for consideration.

Issue 2 (Equity). A Marine may be separated for a commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation. A military or civilian conviction is not required for discharge under this provision. Additionally, w hen a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for one violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 134, Making and uttering worthless checks. A v iolation of UCMJ Article 134 is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct, or favorable endorsements in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided one document of educational pursuits and one legal letter from the State of California. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

 None

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 1989 – 17 Aug 1995, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

 C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 134, Making and uttering worthless checks.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00772

    Original file (MD00-00772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 920908: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (3 specs):Specification 1: Make and utter check #578 to MWR 0150 for the amount of $14.25 and did thereafter dishonorably fail to maintain sufficient funds for payment on 920718. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued940419: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00649

    Original file (MD03-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service and reason for discharge was discovered by the NDRB. 911217: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division] directed the Applicant's discharge under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600398

    Original file (MD0600398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ Other. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00425

    Original file (MD03-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00425 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030116. This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Two photos of Applicant Letter from CANG...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600749

    Original file (MD0600749.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ex-PVT, USMCDocket No. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The factual basis for this recommendation was your three nonjudicial punishments, one evidencing your willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and your uttering worthless checks by dishonorably failing to maintain...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600437

    Original file (ND0600437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 921218: Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 921218.921222: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1206 on 921222 (4 days/surrendered).930309: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Failure to go to duty section muster on 930207.Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Negligent dereliction of duty on 930225. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00459

    Original file (ND04-00459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “To Whom It May Concern:Applicant) am requesting a review of my military record to obtain an Honorable Discharge versus a General, Under Honorable Discharge to obtain my education benefits from the Veterans Affairs Office. Therefore, she was discharged from the naval service with a characterization of General, under honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600409

    Original file (ND0600409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ HONORABLE.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-142 (formerly 3630605). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00324

    Original file (MD04-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00324 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031210. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20020326 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00424

    Original file (MD02-00424.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Not appealed.000120: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: Failed to obey MCO 4600.40 by using an issued government credit card for unofficial business and withdrawing funds of unnecessary items in the amount of $210.24 on 27Aug99, 30Aug99, 6 and 7 Sep99.Violation of UCMJ, Article 107:Specification: Make a false statement to SgtMaj regarding an issued government credit card on 23Nov99.Violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Specification: Driving under the influence on 19Jan00.Awarded...