Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00392
Original file (MD01-00392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00392

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010208, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010822. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. I need two get Discharge upgraded So I can use my Benefits two get an house from me and my family

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                840824 - 840904  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 840905               Date of Discharge: 870720

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 10 16 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 44

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.5 (5)                       Conduct: 2.8 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 524

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS /Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

851209:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: Absent from appointed place of duty 0701, 3Dec85 to 0830, 4Dec85 (1 day).
Specification 2: Absent from appointed place of duty 0430-1145, 6Dec85.
Awarded forfeiture of $150.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Forfeiture and restriction suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
851212:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0730, 12Dec85.

860111:  Applicant declared a deserter.

 870520:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 1400, 20May87 (523 days/ apprehended). Applicant to confinement.

870612:  Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. In the request the applicant noted that his counsel had fully explained the elements of the offenses for which he was charged and that he understood the elements of the offenses. He further certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service would be under other than honorable conditions. The applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0730, 12Dec85 to 1400, 20May87.

870619:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

870622:  Applicant released from confinement.

870622:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division (Rein)] determined that applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct triable by court-martial.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 870720 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The Veteran’s Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. On 871206, in requesting separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, the applicant signed a statement that he understood the adverse nature of such a characterization of service as well as the potential life-long adverse consequences thereof. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 May 84 until 26 Jun 89.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00403

    Original file (MD03-00403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00403 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030107, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that may be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00150

    Original file (MD03-00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Days of Unauthorized Absence: 53 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER CONDITIONS OTHER THAN HONORABLE/Separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 880523: Applicant to unauthorized absence from 2001, 880523.880604: Applicant in hands of civilian authorities 2359, 880604. 880606: Applicant from unauthorized absence 1059, 880606 (13 days/apprehended).880606: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00305

    Original file (MD02-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00305 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. We request equitable relief of the current discharge based on the good prior service of the member. 871231: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00963

    Original file (MD03-00963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00963 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030508. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00302

    Original file (MD04-00302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00302 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031205. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00798

    Original file (MD04-00798.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 850716 to 890710 (1455 days).890823: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.890824: Applicant from confinement.890830: GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Division, FMF, Camp Lejeune, NC] determined that Applicant had no potential for further service,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00939

    Original file (MD00-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00939 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000724, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00560

    Original file (MD02-00560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00560 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020318, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 880111: Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00762

    Original file (MD00-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 871022 - 880221 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 880222 Date of Discharge: 890104 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 10 13 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 20 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00189

    Original file (MD00-00189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-LCpl, USMC Docket No. MD00-00189 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991118, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION