Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600199
Original file (MD0600199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00199

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20051108 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant designate d T_ L. F_, a non-accredited representative , on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060915 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached letter to the Board:
“ Ladies and Gentlemen,

In January 2002 I and three other Marines in my unit were accused of using illegal drug while serving in Motor Transport in the United States Marine Corps while stationed at Camp Pendleton, California.

We were consequently discharged on March 15 TH , 2002 with “under other than honorable conditions.

I submit the following as the basis for my appeal to upgrade my discharge to either “Honorable ” or “Under Honorable Conditions” because I know we did no wrong.

The illegal drugs we supposedly used, we purchased at the local downtown Oceanside GNC store, which is a health-food store.

I submit here that there was nothing on the container label that indicated any illegal drugs or anything harmful to the human body had been used in the formula.

We would purchase this powered formula and mix it with milk to drink, and along with regular weight lifting and other strenuous exercise, it would increase our physical strength and body mass.

 Pasta has the same effect on the human body, only very large quantities of past must be consumed to achieve what these flavored drinks do, any body builder or physical trainer will say the same.

 I also submit that during the last Olympic Games that were held in Salt Lake City, Utah, a number of Olympic Champions were also accused of using illegal drugs and they were consequently removed as champion s .

 They had also been using these same kinds of drinks to help tone their bodies and to increase their performance, earning them their status as champions.

 All have since been vindicated following an FDA investigation and their status has been reinstated as Olympic champions, but it cannot be the same because of the humiliation that they have been forces to endure, as I and my fellow Marines have been forced to endure.

Thank you for your time and consideration in this very important matter.

I still hold the Marine Corps in very high regard, and for our future generations, I truly hope that justice will prevail.

Respectfully,
[signed] T_ F_ (Applicant)
 T_ C_ F_ (Applicant) – (SSN)
(Address)
(Telephone) ”


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant letter dtd October 31, 2005 (2 pages)
 Applicant’s DD Form 214
 Applicant’s DD Form 21 5

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20001208 - 20010 12 1       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20010122              Date of Discharge: 20020315

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 0 1 0 1 24
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: none
         Confinement:              none

Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 36

Highest Rank: PFC                                    MOS: 3531

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4 . 3 ( 4 )                        Conduct: 4 . 2 ( 4 )
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Sharpshooter Badge .


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

00 1208 :  CG Level waiver granted.

020123:  Battalion NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs): Failure to obey a lawful order.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Drunken or reckless driving.
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 5 00 .00 pay per month for 2 month s (suspended for 6 months) , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 2 . No indication of appeal .
020128 :  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA msg 282210Z JAN 02 reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 020118 , tested positive for THC .
020204 :  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct ( Specifically, on 020123 Applicant was found guilty at Bn NJP for violating the UCMJ. On 020112 Applicant was detained by PMO for driving under the influence of alcohol, and drinking under the age of 21. Also advised that my driving privileges are temporary revoked until my magistrate hearing which is scheduled for 8 February 2002, at which time I will have my driving privileges suspended for a year from that date. If I am caught driving aboard any Base while in a suspended status Applicant will be in violation of a lawful order and the UCMJ and will be subject to further judicial or adverse administrative action. I am further notified I am not eligible for promotion for a period of 12 months from the date of my conviction at Bn NJP for DUI which was on 020123. ) N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
020206:  Battalion NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of controlled substance.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days. Not appealed.
020207:  Medical Entry, Naval Addictions Rehabilitation and Education Department, Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA, LCDR M_ R_, MC, USN, Psychiatrist: Applicant refus es medical officer’s evaluation for addictions due to positive UDS Marijuana – THC.

020207:  Medical Entry, Naval Addictions Rehabilitation and Education Department, Naval Hospital, Camp Pendleton, CA, LCDR M_ R_, MC, USN, Psychiatrist: Applicant advised of VA addiction treatment availability.

 020212:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct ( Applicant found guilty at Battalion NJP for violating the UCMJ. In particular for using a controlled substance THC with a level of 64 NG/ML) . N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided. Applicant advised of being processed for administrative discharge due to drug abuse.

020212 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of illegal drug use under other than honorable conditions. The factual basis for this recommendation was positive urinalysis dated 31 January 2002. Applicant informed the least favorable character of service possible was as under other than honorable conditions.

020212 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

0 20212 :  Commanding Officer, Headquarters Battalion, 1 st Marine Division , recommended to Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division Applicant’s discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug usage (violation of article 112a UCMJ) . Commanding Officer’s comments: “ Pvt F_ (Applicant) has no potential for further productive service. The documented instance of his misconduct represents a “significant departure” from the conduct expected of all Marines. Because of the unsatisfactory quality of this Marine’s conduct, and the positive results of his urinalysis test for use of marijuana; I recommend that he be discharged with a characterization of service as under other than honorable .”

020222 :  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
020301 :  GCMCA, Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse .

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020315 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

The Applicant implies that his positive urinalysis was the result of taking commercially available legal supplements. T he Board found there is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was inequitably or improperly denied the opportunity to challenge the positive urinalysis results, the nonjudicial punishment or to fully exercise his rights during the administrative discharge process. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning and 2 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 92, 111 and 112a of the UCMJ. The NDRB advises the Applicant that certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Marine Corps in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Violations of Article 92, 111 and 112a are considered serious offenses and a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged at a special or general court-martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant asserts in support of his contention that certain unnamed Olympic athletes during the Salt Lake City Olympics were accused of illegal drug use, “removed as champions” and subsequently “vindicated following an FDA investigation.” The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Marine Corps. Based upon available records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Marine Corps. A preponderance of the evidence reviewed supports the conclusion that the Applicant used an illegal drug, that separation from the Marine Corps was appropriate, and that an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge was warranted. As such, relief is denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective
01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00421

    Original file (ND04-00421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00421 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040114. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00862

    Original file (MD04-00862.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01027

    Original file (MD04-01027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-001027 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040607. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Character Statement from A_ O_ 4 pages from Applicant’s medical record Ltr from Applicant, undated Ltr...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501379

    Original file (MD0501379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01379 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050815. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. My hope is that you, the Discharge Review Board, will consider a re-evaluation of the discharge I was given at the time of my administrative separation from the United States Marine Corps.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01174

    Original file (MD04-01174.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-01174 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040714. Medical Physical and personal problems also affected my ability to serve in the Corps effectively. My ability to serve effectively in the United States Marine Corps was also impaired by reoccurring abdominal complications that resulted from a major surgery that was performed while I was stationed aboard Head Quarters and Support Battalion; Okinawa, Japan in 1999.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501225

    Original file (MD0501225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01225 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050713. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). As such, it is my opinion that LCpl H_(Applicant) should be administratively separated from the Marine Corps.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501384

    Original file (MD0501384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5. (note: not dated)921207: Veteran’s Administration Statement of Understanding: Applicant signed statement: Although I...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00962

    Original file (MD03-00962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990629: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.000822: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501088

    Original file (MD0501088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Something Good (If possible).” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I Thank you for your time, & would want my RE code eligable to Join the Air Force.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501002

    Original file (MD0501002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. LCpl T_(Applicant)’s Level III failure ws due to his DUI on 960601.Per the reference, I recommend that LCpl T_(Applicant) be separated from the U. S. Marine Corps by reason of level III after-care failure and alcohol dependency. I further recommend that the characterization of service be under honorable conditions (general).” 961212: Counseling: Advised of...