Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00962
Original file (MD03-00962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00962

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030508. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040401. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “You’ve probably heard, read, and seen every excuse possible. I have no excuse for what I did. I was of sound mind and keen of the U.C.M.J. regulations and guidelines at the exact moment of my misconduct.

I’m simply submitting this request to upgrade my discharge from O.T.H. to at least a general discharge in order to obtain employment – this has not been possible due to disclosure of my DD 214 form during a background investigation pryor to employment.

-Thank you for your consideration and understanding

D_ F_ M_ (Applicant)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                990730 - 990920  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 990921               Date of Discharge: 020222

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 02
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 29                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 10 GED           AFQT: 67

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.5 (7)                       Conduct: 4.5 (7)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990629:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
000822:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Failure to maintain the high standards expected of a military policeman by my excessive consumption of alcohol in the barracks and my failure to maintain my assigned quarters in an adequate state of cleanliness.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
011129:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [On 010921 I did on Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton on or about 2045, willfully violate a lawful general order, paragraph 2504 (2) Base Order P5000.2J dated 990504 by allowing LCpl M_ to wrongfully operate my privately owned motorcycle while on the base.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
020107:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 011228, tested positive for cocaine.

 020131:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Used a scheduled II controlled substance between 011222 and 011223, to wit: cocaine.
Awarded forfeiture of $619.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to PFC. Not appealed.
020201:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
020201:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

020204:  Applicant refused evaluation for drug dependency by a Medical Officer.

020207:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation is that on or about 011222 to 011223, Lance Corporal M_ (Applicant) was at the pier on the coast highway, Oceanside, CA, Lance Corporal M_ (Applicant) knowingly and willingly used a scheduled II controlled substance, to wit: cocaine. On or about 020108, Lance Corporal M_ (Applicant) test positive for cocaine on a urinalysis test.

020215:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

020215:  GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020222 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, to enhance employment opportunities, or for good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600291

    Original file (MD0600291.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 031114: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to include written statements in rebuttal to this proposed separation.031117: Commanding Officer, 1 st Battalion, 5 th Marine Regiment forwards recommendation to Commanding General, 1 st Marine Division (REIN) via Commanding Officer, 5 th...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01059

    Original file (MD03-01059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01059 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030530. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as requested in the issue.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600062

    Original file (MD0600062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Commanding Officer’s comments: “On 17 October 2001, Lance Corporal G_ (Applicant) as given an opportunity to serve in the United States Marine Corps under a Drug Use and Abuse waiver. When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00443

    Original file (MD99-00443.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the incident I have completed a 12 month drug & alcohol program and have had no further occurances of the incident. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 901128 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01028

    Original file (MD01-01028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise that administrative discharge processing mandatory.000816: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.000816: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00406

    Original file (MD03-00406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. I was discharged from the United States Marine Corps on June 16, 2000 with an Other Than Honorable Discharge, because of the results of a positive drug test.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00630

    Original file (MD04-00630.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. During that inspection LCpl B_ blew in a breathalyzer with a result of .06. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00914

    Original file (MD01-00914.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00914 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010703, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00981

    Original file (MD03-00981.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00981 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030513. During my time at Marine Security Guard School I was promoted to Corporal (E-4), and received a Good Conduct Medal for 3 years of continuous good conduct. 000415: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00934

    Original file (MD99-00934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Within my three years eight months and twenty-one days of service, this is the only incident on my service record. Throughout my service in the Marine Corps, I have conducted and performed to the best of my ability. 980223: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge with a general (under honorable...