Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501291
Original file (ND0501291.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-HR, USN
Docket No. ND05-01291

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050727. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060406. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “This discharge was based on one individual incident. I’ve never tested positive, prior to or during the time, I was active duty. An individual who attended a bachelor party in fact planted the elements that were found during testing within a drink. The individuals name is B_ B_. Mr. B_, who found out at a later date that I had tested positive for a control substance, came forward with information that He laced several drinks at the party with cocaine powder. At which time my defense team requested the matter be heard before a court martial. Mr. B_ agreed and tested at this court martial.
The court martial was not ordered by the Government but requested by my defense team and me so the truth could be heard from Mr. B_ concerning this issue.
This discharge of Other Than Honorable has prevented me obtaining employment and hinders my future of ever gaining employment if this issue is not upgraded. ”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2)
Certification of military service, dtd January 23, 2003 (2)
Letter from Applicant, dtd September 27, 2005

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19911206 - 19920727      COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19920728             Date of Discharge: 19941216

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 04 19 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 20

 Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 59

 Highest Rate: HA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.4 (2)                       Behavior: 3.4 (2)                 OTA: 3.40

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

911206:  Applicant granted for a pre-service waiver for charge of discharging a firearm.

920730:  Counseling: You (Applicant) are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose preservice civil involvement/drug abuse. This decision is based on the information you provided the Recruit Quality Assurance Interviewer and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, this waiver is void and you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings, ie., discharging firearm in city limits, Sumter, SC, 12/91. Paid $200.00. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

920928:  Counseling: You (Applicant) are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose your preservice involvement with civil authorities and/or illegal drugs consisting of the following: - criminal sexual conduct in Mar 90 in Sumter, SC; no charges filed. This waiver is being granted by the Commanding Officer, RTC San Diego, CA. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation. This waiver is being granted based upon known discrepancies in your service application. If additional discrepancies are discovered, this waiver may be considered void and could be processed for administrative separation under other than honorable conditions as well as disciplinary actions being taken.

930622:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 930611, tested positive for cocaine.

940125:  Special Court Martial:
         Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a:
         Specification: Did, in the Sumter , South Carolina area, on or about 5 June 1993, wrongfully use cocaine. Plea : Not guilty. Finding : Guilty.
          Sentence: Hard labor without confinement for 1 month, reduction to E-1.
          CA 920324: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
940329:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

940329:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
940607:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.
940621:  Counsel for the respondent letter of deficiencies.

 940808:  Commanding Officer, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, MD recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (cocaine), as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis, which was disciplined by a special court-martial. Commanding Officer’s comments: “I concur with the findings and recommendations of the Board. HA G_(Applicant)’s actions demonstrates an unwillingness or inability to conform to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Navy’s policy of “zero tolerance” concerning drug use. It was determined at HA G_(Applicant)’s special court-martial that misconduct due to drug abuse was committed. Therefore, I recommend that HA G_(Applicant) be separated from the naval service.”

 940927:  Chief of Naval Personnel recommended to Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs), Applicant’s discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

941012:  Applicant found qualified for separation.

 941128:  Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

941201:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19941216 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant states his discharge was based on one isolated incident. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service record is marred by conviction at special court martial for illegal drug use, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore consider his discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by special court martial proceedings for violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. Additionally, the Applicant received a retention warning for defective enlistment due to failure to disclose pre-service involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.
The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.
 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of controlled substance.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600359

    Original file (ND0600359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Recommend VA system treatment programs be made available to him after separation if he wishes to use them.900730: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse, that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00642

    Original file (MD02-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived) or (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. The finding for Misconduct is effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95, however, the Commandant of the Marine Corps issued an official list of the new DoD SPD codes and narrative reasons for separation on 940701. 930212: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00378

    Original file (MD04-00378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues in writing for consideration by the Board. The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00243

    Original file (ND04-00243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I love my country and would gladly serve again if I could. I strongly recommend that he be discharged from the Navy and that the characterization of his discharge be other than honorable.900105: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501005

    Original file (ND0501005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I strongly recommend that he be separated from the naval service and his service be characterized as Other Than Honorable”.010809: Commander, Submarine Group 9 The Applicant provided 12 character/job reference letters, 80 pages from his service record and 6 certificates of training earned during his service, as documentation of his post service accomplishments. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600793

    Original file (ND0600793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT (DRUG ABUSE), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620. The Applicant requests upgrade in order to obtain educational benefits and because he needs a better job to “support” his “family.” The Veterans Administration determines...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500364

    Original file (ND0500364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19990818 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). There is credible evidence in the form of the Applicant’s own admission and a positive urinalysis screening, that he used illegal drugs.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600511

    Original file (ND0600511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). May God bless you and thanks in advance for your help.” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service - 7) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500088

    Original file (ND0500088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5420 CORB:003 14 Feb 06 From: Secretarial Review AuthorityTo: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Via: President, Naval Discharge Review BoardSubj: REQUEST FOR REVIEW: CASE OF H------O. MC____-, (B---------) , EX AT2, USNR DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AT2, USNR Docket No. The Navy’s Drug Lab urinalysis test has indicated that her urine sample has indeed tested positive for cocaine, yet a civilian hair DNA test has...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600399

    Original file (MD0600399.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After being there for a few months I found out our Battalion was going to get deployed to iraq. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs.