Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501216
Original file (ND0501216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-MSSA, USN
Docket No. ND05-01216

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050713. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060216 a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder.
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 “Number 28 on the member 4 page of my DD Form 214 says that I was separated for having Personality Disorder. I was perfectly fine when I enlisted, but if this statement is true, I would like to know why didn’t I receive any medical attention from the Navy. Instead I was just sent home.”
Applicant’s Remarks: (Taken from the DD Form 293.)

Since my discharge separation I have graduated from college but it’s hard for me to get good jobs because most places ask for my military history. I’m just trying to figure out can anything be done about this situation.

 Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20020604 - 20020606      COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20020607             Date of Discharge: 20030306

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 09 00
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence:    None
         Confinement:                       None

 Age at Entry: 19

 Years Contracted: 4 (12 month extension)

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 35

 Highest Rate: MSSA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                                    Behavior: NA*             OTA: NA*

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal
* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030206:  Medical evaluation by Clinical Psychologist, Commander W_ E. H_ on 20030110 and 2003025.
 Applicant diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct and personality disorder not otherwise specified with antisocial, immature, and borderline features. The clinical psychologist recommended expeditious administrative separation. The Applicant manifests a long-standing disorder of character and behavior which is of such severity as to interfere with him serving adequately in the Navy. Although not imminently suicidal or homicidal, he is at continuing risk to harm to himself or others if retained in the service. In the examiner’s opinion the Applicant does not possess a severe mental disease or defect for the purpose of R.C.M. 706 examination and is considered competent.
030224:  Applicant found physically qualified for separation.

030227:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of convenience of the government - personality disorder. Applicant notified that the least favorable characterization of service possible is general (under honorable conditions).
030227:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights.
030227:  Commanding Officer, USS ARDENT (MCM 12) directed discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government - personality disorder. Commanding Officer’s comments: “Seaman Apprentice R_(Applicant) was a highly motivated sailor upon his arrival to ARDENT three months ago. In January 2003, however, shortly after our holiday stand-down and an underway period, Seaman R_(Applicant) started demonstrating some problems with his performance. Seaman R_(Applicant) was given ample opportunity to adjust to the lifestyle changes required of a sailor upon their arrival to their first warship. He demonstrated a high level of motivation and professionalism when he initially reported to the ship, but his performance since then has digressed. SA R_(Applicant) began to perceive any order or counseling as a personal attack on his character and failed to realize that his chain of command was just trying to help his to succeed. He fell into a pattern where he was consistently late for work and failed to complete tasks assigned to him in a thorough and professional manner. Seaman Apprentice R_(Applicant) walked into the Naval Support Activity Medical Clinic on January 25, 2003 complaining of suicidal ideations. He was evaluated by the NSA Psychologist, Dr H_, and was returned for duty the next day. After a short underway period, SA R_(Applicant) was sent to Dr. H_ for a periodic re-evaluation. During the interview he made comments to the effect of wanting to shoot his Department Head. Several days later, while being counse1ed for his poor performance by his Leading Petty Officer he made remarks to his Leading Chief Petty Officer, that if he had a knife he would have stabbed his LPO. Seaman Apprentice R_(Applicant) was immediately removed from the ship and sent to Dr. H_ for a re-evaluation. After this interview Dr. H_ found MSSA R_(Applicant) manifested “a long-standing disorder of character and behavior, which is of such severity as to interfere with him serving adequately in the Navy. Although not imminently suicidal or homicidal, he is at continued risk to do harm to himself or others if retained in the service.” Dr. H_ recommended Expeditious Administrative Separation due to Personality Disorder. I fully concur with the Clinical Psychologist’s assessment and find it necessary to administratively separate MSSA R_(Applicant) from the Navy.”
Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20030306 by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The Applicant was diagnosed, by a qualified clinical psychologist, as possessing a long-standing disorder of character and behavior of such severity as to interfere with serving adequately in the Navy. He was considered a continuing risk to do harm to himself or others if retained in the Naval service. The Applicant's DD Form 214, Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, indicates he was separated for a Personality Disorder. No other Narrative Reason for Separation could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged. To change the Narrative Reason for Separation would be inappropriate.

The Applicant contends that he should have received medical treatment for his diagnosed personality disorder. Despite the Applicant’s contentions, t he Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge because an Applicant may not have received appropriate treatment for a specific medical condition. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Under applicable regulations, separations based on a personality disorder should be honorable unless a general (under honorable conditions) or an entry-level separation is warranted. A general discharge may be warranted if the Applicant’s service contains records of nonjudicial punishments, disciplinary actions, or if other significant negative aspects existed, which outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s period of service. Additionally, a general discharge may be warranted if the Applicant’s performance evaluation averages are not sufficient to merit an honorable discharge. The Applicant’s record contains no evidence of NJP or other disciplinary action. However, the evidence of record indicates the Applicant was consistently late for work and failed to complete tasks assigned to him in a thorough and professional manner. Furthermore, the evidence of record indicates the Applicant made comments to the effect of wanting to shoot his Department Head and stab his Lead Petty Officer. Based upon such evidence, the Board concluded the Applicant’s conduct was insufficient to merit an honorable discharge. By unanimous vote, the Board found the discharge both proper and equitable as issued. Relief denied.

 There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of enhancing employment opportunities and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225), Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600148

    Original file (ND0600148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or attached document/letter: “ Dear NDRB,The following issues are the reasons I believe my discharge should be upgraded to Honorable and the reenlistment code be changed to RE-1 with corresponding Separation Program Number/designator. If I was considered such...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600211

    Original file (ND0600211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was processed for administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to personality disorder without the need for further counseling or treatment. The Applicant states that, because he was not assigned to the occupational field he was “verbally promised,” he claimed he was having suicidal ideations to facilitate a discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501117

    Original file (MD0501117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was told that since I was not healing, that I would be administratively separated and I was moved to Recruit Separation Platoon (RSP). ” Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Psychological evaluation report, for evaluation conducted April 17, 2004 (6 pages) Twenty-seven pages from Applicant’s service and medical records Applicant’s DD Form 214 The Commanding Officer, Support...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501226

    Original file (MD0501226.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application and/or from an attached document/letter to the Board:“Application for correction of military record under the provisions of title 10, U. S. code, section 1552 (5, 6) Application for the review of discharge from the Armed Forces of the Unites States (6):I, R_ E_ K_(Applicant), would like to request that my discharge determination of Other than Honorable be changed to a Medical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600033

    Original file (ND0600033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Eligible for Reenlist”. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000609 by reason of convenience of the government due to physical or mental conditions, not a disability (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). On...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00471

    Original file (MD02-00471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant's father dated December 27, 2001 Statement from Applicant's mother dated December 27, 2001Statement from doctor dated December 12, 2001Copy of Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4)Nine pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01304

    Original file (MD02-01304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    990510: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under uncharacterized conditions for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by psychological evaluation. The Board does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s documented condition of possessing a personality disorder during the time of his enlistment and implied incorrect diagnosis to be of sufficient nature to warrant a change to his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01370

    Original file (ND03-01370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01370 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030814. F_ if there was anything the Navy could do to help me, but she told me there was nothing. The Applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority of such severity as to render the Applicant incapable of serving adequately in the naval service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600606

    Original file (MD0600606.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I do not have a personality disorder - never did. Through his actions and inability to adapt to military life, Private R_, has demonstrated that he is incapable of continued service in the United States Marine Corps.001128: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Pendleton, CA, approved the Applicant's discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of convenience of the government, specifically due to a personality disorder. I do not have a personality disorder – never did.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600283

    Original file (ND0600283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The patient denied any auditory or visual hallucinations, denied delusions, ideas of reference, or any other psychotic symptoms. No indication of appeal in the record.040618: Psychiatric evaluation at Naval Hospital, Great Lakes, Illinois, by P. K_, MD: Attention is directed to a copy of Doctor N_ psychiatric examination dated 7 April 2004 at which time he was diagnosed with depressive disorder, not otherwise specified, and borderline personality disorder. He stated he did not like the...