Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600211
Original file (ND0600211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND06-00211

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 2005 1 114 . The Applicant requests the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 2006092 6 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Honorable by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder .

PART I -

APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant ’s issues, as stated on the application:
“ The current narrative reason for separation states personality disorder. This was not the case. When I enlisted in the navy, I was verbally promised a career field in firefighting. After MEPS processing and BMT, I was not placed in firefighting , but instead into communications/ lintel . I was not happy with that situation an was informed by Dr. K_ L_, Lt, MCS, USNR, SSN (social security number deleted), that I could be released if I would just claim that I was thinking about committing suicide. Being young and immature I concurred. I was unaware of the consequences that decision would bring. I am now trying to enlist in the Alabama Air National Guard, and because of the false information by that doctor, I was given a re-enlistment code that now makes me ineligible to enlist with the ANG. I want to serve my country in the ANG, and am willing to do whatever is require d of me to make this happen. I have attached several letters of recommendation from friends and neighbors who are currently serving in the military. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.

As a side not e, my Date of Birth on my 214 is incorrect as well. It should read 02 JUL 73. ”
Documentation
In addition to the service and medical record s , the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Character Reference ltr from B_ L. A_, LtCol, USAF, NC, Deputy Director, Business Systems Division, dtd October 5, 2005
Letter of recommendation from H_ G. P_, Jr., CW4, AV, AL ARNG, Training Officer, dtd September 29, 2005
Letter of recommendation from W_ E. K_, Lieutenant Colonel, Retired, USAF, dtd October 3, 2005
Letter of recommendation from D_ D. P_, MSGT, USAF, NCOIC, Clinical Laboratory Services, dtd October 9, 2005
 Applicant ’s DD Form 214
 Eleven pages from Applicant ’s service record
Three pages of personal information pertaining to the Applicant
Copy of Applicant’s social security card
Copy of Applicant’s high school diploma
Copy of Applicant’s birth certificate

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19930805 - 19940123       COG
         Active: None

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19940124     Date of Discharge: 19940923

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 00 0 8 00
          Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 20

Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 53

Highest Rate: SA

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                                     Behavior: 3.6 ( 1 )                 OTA: 3.6 0
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal
* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

HONORABLE/ PERSONALITY DISORDER, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3620200.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940621:  Medical evaluation by HM1 N_ B. S_. Branch Naval Hospital, TN.
          20 year old white male needs to talk to someon e about discharge, psychiatric.
         Situation: Negative f amily or personal history of ETOH or drug abuse. Negative civil or military legal action pending against Applicant. Negative suicidal or homicidal ideations. Applicant upset because preferred rating (JO) not available and is locked into CTT rating. Currently in JOBS and is doing well. Applicant has definite plans for future career.
         Assessment: Not a medical problem, this administrative.
          Plan: Applicant counseled on this being an administrative problem not a medical problem. Instructed to contact career counselor. At this time patient does not have suicidal or homicidal ideations and will seek treatment if Applicant develops any suicidal or homicidal ideas.

940629:  Medical evaluation by HM1 N_ B. S_. Branch Naval Hospital, TN.
         Situation: Applicant referred to medical for consult to psyche by supervisor. Changes in Applicant’s emotional state since last exam on 940621. Denies suicidal Ideation, Homicidal Ideation.
         Assessment: Still an administrative problem.
         Plan: HMC C_ contacted CPO M_ via telephone and clarified the fact that this is an administrative problem and not a medical or psychological problem.
940811 :  Medical evaluation by Lt K_ L_, MSC, USNR, at Branch Medical Clinic, Corry Station, Mental Health Division .
Clinical Impression: AXIS II – Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified, with dependent and immature traits.
Clinical Opinion: The personality disorder is chronic, severe and not expected to improve with command counseling or psychiatric attention in a military setting.
 Recommendation: Administrative separation at the convenience of the government by reason of severe personality disorder. Retention on active duty carries with it the omnipresent risk of suicide.

940825 :  Applicant notified of intended recomm endation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general by reason of convenience of the government as e videnced by a pe rsonality disorder.
940825 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation .
940830:  Medical evaluation by Lt K_ L_, MSC, USNR, at Branch Medical Clinic, Corry Station, Mental Health Division.
         Applicant presented for follow up. No change in personality dis order diagnosis.

940914:  Applicant found physically qualified for separation.

 941013 :  Commanding Officer, Naval Technical Training Center, Corry Station, Pensacola , notified Chief of Naval Personnel (PERS 282) of Applicant ’s honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to personality disorder . Commanding Officer’s comments: “ Seaman Apprentice J_( Applicant ) reported to this command on 13 July 1994. He was processed for administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to personality disorder without the need for further counseling or treatment. He did not object to this action. ”
Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19940923 by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder (A) with a service characterization of honorable . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).

The Applicant implies that his discharge is inequitable because he did not have a personality disorder. The Applicant states that, because he was not assigned to the occupational field he was “verbally promised,” he claimed he was having suicidal ideations to facilitate a discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a personality disorder. The Applicant was diagnosed with a personality disorder by a competent medical authority on 19940811. Neither the evidence of record nor the documents and statements submitted by the Applicant persuaded the Board that this diagnosis and subsequent administrative separation was improper or inequitable. Relief denied.

The Applicant implies that he would like to have his narrative reason and re-code changed to enable him to enlist in the Alabama Air National Guard. The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The Board discovered no improprieties or inequities in the Applicant’s discharge. The Board has no authority to change a narrative reason for discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Additionally, since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Relief is not warranted.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. An Applicant’s narrative reason for separation is not normally changed on the basis of post-service conduct.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 Jul 94 until 23 Jun 96, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500900

    Original file (ND0500900.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was 4 to 1 that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. Although the member is not presently considered suicidal or homicidal, the member is judged to represent a continuing danger to self or others if retained in the military service.991115: CAAC evaluation: Applicant diagnosed alcohol dependent. The service member is recommended for administrative separation per applicable service directive.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600056

    Original file (ND0600056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant is not currently suicidal. Plan: (1) Applicant readily agrees to present to corpsman on ship if suicidal ideations recur. Regarding the presumption of regularity in government affairs, in the absence of the administrative separation package, the Board presumed that the Applicant was properly notified of the proposed separation, afforded the opportunity to elect or waive his applicable rights, and that the separation authority approved the basis for discharge and characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600033

    Original file (ND0600033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Eligible for Reenlist”. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20000609 by reason of convenience of the government due to physical or mental conditions, not a disability (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). On...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600252

    Original file (MD0600252.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The service member is unsuitable for continued military service on the basis of the above diagnosis of Personality Disorder. Recommends that Private First Class K_ (Applicant) be discharged for a personality order and that the characterization of service be General (Under Honorable Conditions).031014: Psychological Evaluation, 1 st Marine Division Psychiatrist, LCDR J_ R_, M.D., MC, USNR: 1. PLANS/RECOMMENDATION The service member is unsuitable for continued military service on the basis...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600234

    Original file (ND0600234.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The patient was seen as an emergency due to feelings of “depression” and suicidal ideations. Applicant found medically qualified for separation.950126: Report of Medical History, Note: Block 25: (4) Admitted 12/28/94 for suicidal ideation - discharged 1-3-95 with diagnosed personality disorder not otherwise specified and life circumstance problem - reason for separation.950221: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged with an honorable by reason of personality disorder, authority: MILPERSMAN,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600255

    Original file (MD0600255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    and pt. Naval Hospital, Okinawa, M. W_: S: Pt (Applicant) seen in follow up denying any further suicidal/homicidal ideation or depressive symptoms since last appointment. In the Applicant’s issue that the narrative reason for discharge should be depression instead of personality disorder, the Board found that the Applicant was diagnosed with " Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with Passive/Aggressive Traits " by competent medical authority at the Psychiatric Clinic, U. S. Naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500497

    Original file (ND0500497.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current General Under Honorable Conditions discharge to Honorable, with a change of the narrative reason to Medical Retirement. J. H_, PHD, Staff Psychologist040209: Medical evaluation by Branch...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600868

    Original file (ND0600868.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Decisional Issues Equity: Discharge should have been for personality disorder Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600173

    Original file (MD0600173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Good (illegible). PRIMARY DIAGNOSES: Antisocial Personality Disorder (DSM-III-R #301.70) and Borderline Personality Disorder (DSI4-III-R #301.83) This member presented with a suicidal gesture and had several contacts with Mental Health for command concerns over suicidality. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative separation.930412: Commanding Officer, Marine Wing Support Group 27 forwards recommendation for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501111

    Original file (ND0501111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Transcripts Full-time student confirmation, dtd September 13, 2004 Evaluation Report and Counseling Record, dtd July 1, 2002 Evaluation Report and Counseling Record, dtd July 15, 2003 Evaluation Report and Counseling Record, dtd December 16, 2003 Appointment of veterans service organization as claimant’s representative, dtd...