Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501115
Original file (ND0501115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-BUCA, USN
Docket No. ND05-01115

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050622. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060209. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Please reconsider discharge. Based on conduct and overall 3.00 evaluations, I do not feel that an under other than honorable discharge is warranted. Thank you for your assistance & consideration!”
Documentation
Only the service record was reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20020419 - 20021021      COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20021022             Date of Discharge: 20041207

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 16
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence:    None
         Confinement:                       None

 Age at Entry: 18

 Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 35

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)                      Behavior: 2.00 (2)                OTA: 2.84

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030813:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92 - (Failure to obey an order or regulation.)
         Award: Forfeiture of 7 days pay (susp 6 mos), restriction and extra duty for 14 days, reduction to E-2 (susp 6 mos). No indication of appeal in the record [extracted from NAVPERS 1626/7 Report and Disposition of Offenses].

040712:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 040707, tested positive for THC.

040720:  Applicant’s voluntary statement.

040820:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a:
         Specification: In that Builder Constructionman W_ (Applicant), U.S. Navy, Naval Station Annapolis, Maryland, on active duty, did, at Annapolis, Maryland, on or about 3 July 2004, wrongfully use marijuana.
         Award: Forfeiture of $668.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.

040831:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. Applicant notified that if separation is approved the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.
040831:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
040902:  Officer in Charge, Construction Battalion Unit FOUR ZERO THREE recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct – drug abuse. Officer in Charge’s comments: “BUCA W_(Applicant) participated in a Urinalysis Command Sweep with a positive urine sample test for marijuana as a result, see Encl (3). In his voluntary statement, he fully admits to buying and using the drug over the Independence Day holiday period. He has waived his rights to an Administrative Board, see Encl (1). Due to the severity of offense, I strongly recommend BUCA W_(Applicant) be separated from the Navy, with his characterization of service being Other than Honorable.”

041112:  Commander, FIRST Naval Construction Division directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20041207 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The Applicant was awarded two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of UCMJ Articles 112a, wrongful drug use and Article 92, failure to obey an order or regulation. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant was properly notified, processed and discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Based upon available records, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. Relief denied.

 The Applicant contends his 3.00 evaluations merit an upgrade in the characterization of his service. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when a member's conduct involves one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. T he Applicant was awarded two nonjudicial punishments for wrongful drug use and failure to obey an order or regulation . The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600251

    Original file (MD0600251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable.The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501288

    Original file (ND0501288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to General (under honorable conditions) and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Secretarial Authority.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. I recommend BUCA C_ (Applicant) be expeditiously discharged from the naval service with an Other than Honorable Discharge.”Commander, Naval Base, San Diego authorized the Applicant's discharge under other...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00049

    Original file (ND00-00049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Police Record Check Letter from applicant Employment Reference Letters (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840705 - 841216 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 841217 Date of Discharge: 861217 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01258

    Original file (ND02-01258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990903 with a characterization of general (under honorable) conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence that the Applicant is living a drug free life style, are examples of verifiable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501548

    Original file (ND0501548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.021206: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to civilian conviction and misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.021221: Applicant broke restriction. 030103: Commanding Officer, Naval Station, Annapolis, recommended discharge under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500948

    Original file (ND0500948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Applicable regulations require that a Sailor’s characterization of service be based upon the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00845

    Original file (ND03-00845.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.010806: Punishment of 45 days restriction and 45 days extra duty previously suspended at CO’s NJP of 010405 vacated due to continued...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01107

    Original file (ND02-01107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the President, Naval Discharge Review Board, directed a document review that was conducted on 030602 before a five-member board. Attempted to observe Applicant one more time to allow him to comply with the CO's order after still refusing to provide a sample, the CO ordered that Applicant be escorted to medical for a blood sample to be taken. In the Applicant’s case, the Board found that the urine sample that determined the Applicant used cocaine and marijuana was collected as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00810

    Original file (ND04-00810.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I did what I was asked to do and still got more punishment than the other 3 people I listed.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00418

    Original file (ND04-00418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.