Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500893
Original file (ND0500893.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-BMSN, USN
Docket No. ND05-00893

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050503. The Applicant requested that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20051117. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the characterization of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in three years and five months of service with no other adverse action.
During my three years and five months of service I received the following:
Sea Service Ribbon & Medal
Global War on Terrorism Ribbon & Medal
National Defense Ribbon & Medal
Armed Forces Expeditionary Ribbon & Medal”

 Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Certificate of completion of Alcohol Misuse and Drug Use Prevention, dtd August 22, 2002
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Evaluation Report and Counseling Record, dtd July 12, 2002
Discharge package, 14 pages from service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20010626 - 20020725      COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20010726             Date of Discharge: 20041229

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 04
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 18

 Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: Unknown

 Highest Rate: BM3
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages :

Performance: 4.0 (1)     Behavior: 4.0 (1)                 OTA: 3.83

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Navy Unit Commendation, Battle “E” Ribbon, Sea Service Deployment (2), Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Service Medal.


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

040429:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 90 (disobey a commissioned officer), Article 134 (cohabitation).
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month and restriction for 10 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

041116:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 041108, tested positive for THC.

041117:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance).
         Award: Reduction in rank to BMSN, forfeiture of $814 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

041118:  Commanding Officer, USS Cleveland (LPD-7) notified the Applicant of his intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct as evidenced by drug abuse.

041118:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

041118:  Commanding Officer, USS Cleveland (LPD-7) recommended to Commander Amphibious Group Three that the Applicant be discharged from the naval service with a characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of Misconduct due to drug abuse.

041201:  Report of Medical Assessment: Applicant set for separation from Navy due to illicit substance use. Counseling on substance abuse/antabuse. Applicant found fit for separation.

041227:  COMPHIBGRU THREE directed Applicants discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

041229:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20041229 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Furthermore, separation processing is mandatory for sailors who abuse illegal drugs, the misconduct for which that Applicant was discharged. The Applicant’s service record documented two nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceedings for violations of UCMJ Article 90 (disobey a superior commissioned officer), Article 134 (cohabitation) and Article 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) . There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Separation under these conditions generally results in an under other than honorable conditions, character of service. The Board could discern no inequity. Relief denied.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant provided no post service documentation for the Board’s consideration.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600549

    Original file (ND0600549.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500866

    Original file (ND0500866.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01319

    Original file (ND03-01319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing, and also advised that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 001030: UA from USS SHREVEPORT (LPD-12) 0630,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501204

    Original file (ND0501204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20020705, the Applicant was so discharged. As such, the Board voted to change the Applicant’s characterization of service to general (under honorable conditions) and his narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority.” Relief granted. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard for acceptable conduct and performance, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00799

    Original file (ND04-00799.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION No indication of appeal in the record.031215: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse per Separation Authority 1910-146 [Extracted from DD Form 214].NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20031215 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). You may view DoD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501414

    Original file (ND0501414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01320

    Original file (ND03-01320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040526. “My name is T_ S_ F_ (Applicant). I was discharged out of the Navy with an Other Than Honorable discharge, because I failed.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01288

    Original file (ND04-01288.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500507

    Original file (ND0500507.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00507 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050131. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. It wasn’t till the end of my enlistment that I started making poor decisions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00009

    Original file (ND00-00009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...